Post removed.
Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2015 3:49 pm
Post removed.
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=249385
I applied to like 20 schools, so I get itbasedvulpes wrote:Thanks, that makes a lot of sense to me. Like I alluded to in my original post I'm fully intending on blanketing almost all of the T14, but as I'm considering my list of schools I didn't know if/how many it's worthwhile to tack on outside the T14 - ideally as pawns.BigZuck wrote: Also you need to acquire some geographic focus, applying to and seriously considering random regional schools that you don't have strong ties to (or at least a strong reason to attend) is also potentially a recipe for disaster.
The reason the 4 schools mentioned are sometimes worth applying to is because they have decent employment/reputation. I showed UCLA my offer from one of those schools and they upped my offer by 20k. But if you have a 167+ 3.8+ then you can just do t14, and maybe UT/UCLA/Vandy tierbasedvulpes wrote:Just curious, why are these schools any better than the schools mentioned in my post? Do they have exceptionally better employment numbers than similarly ranked schools?Iwanttolawschool wrote:If you have the credentials for T14, then don't apply to anything less than T20 except maybe add BU,BC,GW,ND. I went to LST and applied to a hand full of schools ranked in the 30-50 range that had decent employment. It was just a waste of my 28 bucks
Also, dumber question, why did you have to spend 28 bucks if you had fee waivers?
RIP USCIwanttolawschool wrote:The reason the 4 schools mentioned are sometimes worth applying to is because they have decent employment/reputation. I showed UCLA my offer from one of those schools and they upped my offer by 20k. But if you have a 167+ 3.8+ then you can just do t14, and maybe UT/UCLA/Vandy tierbasedvulpes wrote:Just curious, why are these schools any better than the schools mentioned in my post? Do they have exceptionally better employment numbers than similarly ranked schools?Iwanttolawschool wrote:If you have the credentials for T14, then don't apply to anything less than T20 except maybe add BU,BC,GW,ND. I went to LST and applied to a hand full of schools ranked in the 30-50 range that had decent employment. It was just a waste of my 28 bucks
Also, dumber question, why did you have to spend 28 bucks if you had fee waivers?
BigZuck wrote:RIP USCIwanttolawschool wrote:The reason the 4 schools mentioned are sometimes worth applying to is because they have decent employment/reputation. I showed UCLA my offer from one of those schools and they upped my offer by 20k. But if you have a 167+ 3.8+ then you can just do t14, and maybe UT/UCLA/Vandy tierbasedvulpes wrote:Just curious, why are these schools any better than the schools mentioned in my post? Do they have exceptionally better employment numbers than similarly ranked schools?Iwanttolawschool wrote:If you have the credentials for T14, then don't apply to anything less than T20 except maybe add BU,BC,GW,ND. I went to LST and applied to a hand full of schools ranked in the 30-50 range that had decent employment. It was just a waste of my 28 bucks
Also, dumber question, why did you have to spend 28 bucks if you had fee waivers?
#never4get
#T184life