deleted
Posted: Wed Jun 17, 2015 1:33 pm
deleted. thanks everyone.
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=249329
Agree with this. You should use the prof as a recommender.swampman wrote:You're right that there's a low probability that they will google your prof. They're reading hundreds of these letters, they don't care who the professor is.
On the off-chance they find his work interesting and do google him, so what? What is the chain of inferences where they hold his drunk in public arrest against you?
I don't see the relationship between public drunkenness and general credibility. And, no, admissions officers are not straining to find weaknesses in applications. It's not an adversarial process.pizzaqueen wrote:I agree with you both. As for the issue of him reflecting poorly on me - it could call into question the veracity of his statements or his general credibility. Also, wouldn't admissions officers be looking for any weaknesses in my application? Mreh.