Page 1 of 1

JD vs JD/LLM

Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2014 11:55 pm
by oceanmd
Does JD/LLM in International Law give a distinct advantage in employment possibilities?

Re: JD vs JD/LLM

Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2014 12:21 am
by RCSOB657
Why would you assume you would have lower grades? Or are you just trying to hedge I guess. I don't know what to tell you, one of my main criteria is a school that offers a joint advanced degree. I have no worries about the other degree, there is nothing wrong with my research skills.

Re: JD vs JD/LLM

Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2014 12:23 am
by patogordo
no

Re: JD vs JD/LLM

Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2014 1:30 am
by McAvoy
getting an llm (that is not in tax from a few particular schools) when one is an american will often make one reek of striver mediocrity

Re: JD vs JD/LLM

Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2014 1:48 am
by gatesome
the only reason to get an LLM is if you want to work and live outside the US

Re: JD vs JD/LLM

Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2014 9:49 am
by oceanmd
Gatesome, I do not want to live or work for extended period of time outside the US, but I would like to work for a company/firm that does business in that part of the world.

Re: JD vs JD/LLM

Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2014 12:50 pm
by A. Nony Mouse
Specialty LLMs are entirely unnecessary and with the exception of very rare instances (e.g. tax) will not help you get a job in the field of the LLM; employers do not require or seek LLM degrees. Also, no, you will not get lower grades in a JD/LLM program than a JD program just because it's a joint program. (I'm not aware of any that allow you to complete both in 3 years as opposed to adding an extra semester, if not year, to your JD, but even so, the idea is not that students completing the program will get lower grades.)

Re: JD vs JD/LLM

Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2014 12:57 pm
by FSK
I don't get LLMs. Everyone knows law school classes are useless. Why in the hell would you spend more time taking useless classes?

Re: JD vs JD/LLM

Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2014 1:21 pm
by A. Nony Mouse
Semi-serious reply: I think originally they were all intended for foreign-educated JDs - doing the LLM allows them to sit for the bar in US jurisdictions. But law schools being law schools, they were always looking for more ways to make money, and opening LLMs up to US JDs is an easy way to do that. So law schools convince students the degree is worth something, there isn't any particular pent up demand for JDs with additional education.

I know a few people who did LLMs - two of them were in tax, and the people are now working at big tax firms; one was in another field entirely, and he's now working in that field. But I think the biggest benefit was having one more year to make connections, rather than the degree itself, and it's a lot of money for one year.

Re: JD vs JD/LLM

Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2014 1:58 pm
by oceanmd
Thank you sooo very much for all the replies. A. Nony Mouse, Duke has JD/LLM for three years. "Students complete requirements for both degrees in three years" from Duke's brochure.

Re: JD vs JD/LLM

Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2014 2:07 pm
by baal hadad
oceanmd wrote:Thank you sooo very much for all the replies. A. Nony Mouse, Duke has JD/LLM for three years. "Students complete requirements for both degrees in three years" from Duke's brochure.
Llms are stupid

Re: JD vs JD/LLM

Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2014 2:10 pm
by McAvoy
baal hadad wrote:
oceanmd wrote:Thank you sooo very much for all the replies. A. Nony Mouse, Duke has JD/LLM for three years. "Students complete requirements for both degrees in three years" from Duke's brochure.
Llms are stupid

Re: JD vs JD/LLM

Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2014 2:19 pm
by oceanmd
Thank you, McAvoy

Re: JD vs JD/LLM

Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2014 2:19 pm
by McAvoy
here to help, 0L