Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=236288
Lawschoolpredictor.comLSATgotrocked wrote:Hey,
If one has a 3.7 GPA, non URM and good letters of rec what would be a competitive LSAT score for T9-14 provided that this person applies very early in the cycle?
Dirigo wrote:T 9-14 is such an odd distinction,
BillPackets wrote:U should go 4 t8-t13
Incorrect. Go to mylsn.infoColonel_funkadunk wrote:Lawschoolpredictor.comLSATgotrocked wrote:Hey,
If one has a 3.7 GPA, non URM and good letters of rec what would be a competitive LSAT score for T9-14 provided that this person applies very early in the cycle?
JC colonel can't u get this simple thing right attax thx pointing out that incorrect directiveAttax wrote:Incorrect. Go to mylsn.infoColonel_funkadunk wrote:Lawschoolpredictor.comLSATgotrocked wrote:Hey,
If one has a 3.7 GPA, non URM and good letters of rec what would be a competitive LSAT score for T9-14 provided that this person applies very early in the cycle?
Sry I fucked up. It's a stupid question anywayBillPackets wrote:JC colonel can't u get this simple thing right attax thx pointing out that incorrect directiveAttax wrote:Incorrect. Go to mylsn.infoColonel_funkadunk wrote:Lawschoolpredictor.comLSATgotrocked wrote:Hey,
If one has a 3.7 GPA, non URM and good letters of rec what would be a competitive LSAT score for T9-14 provided that this person applies very early in the cycle?
Can we cut this shit out, TLS? I scored way above what my PTs would indicate. I doubt many people scored their absolute minimum on PTs. If your PT range is 168-178 that means your LSAT score will likely fall in that range. It doesn't mean your LSAT score will be 168.whereskyle wrote:Dont take the test until 168 is your bottom lsat score on prep tests. You will probably get your bottom lsat score on test day.
AgreedPeanutsNJam wrote:Can we cut this shit out, TLS? I scored way above what my PTs would indicate. I doubt many people scored their absolute minimum on PTs. If your PT range is 168-178 that means your LSAT score will likely fall in that range. It doesn't mean your LSAT score will be 168.whereskyle wrote:Dont take the test until 168 is your bottom lsat score on prep tests. You will probably get your bottom lsat score on test day.
"I scored way above what my PTs would indicate" how many points above? Feel free to PM.PeanutsNJam wrote:Can we cut this shit out, TLS? I scored way above what my PTs would indicate. I doubt many people scored their absolute minimum on PTs. If your PT range is 168-178 that means your LSAT score will likely fall in that range. It doesn't mean your LSAT score will be 168.whereskyle wrote:Dont take the test until 168 is your bottom lsat score on prep tests. You will probably get your bottom lsat score on test day.