W&M Ranking Forum
-
- Posts: 140
- Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2014 10:10 pm
W&M Ranking
Is W & M considered to be a good regional school that is worth attending with a good scholarship offer? What I learnt from this forum is that you should attend T 14 with some scholarship, or a good regional school with a very good scholarship, like 75% off. Is W & M this good regional school for Virginia? with ATL ranking dropping from 34 to 39?
With ATL ranking dropping, LSAT median dropping to 163, applications dropping, what moved W&M from 33 to 24 in USN ranking?
If you have to choose between W&M and ND (USN 26, ATL 17), isn't ND a much better choice?
Thank you.
With ATL ranking dropping, LSAT median dropping to 163, applications dropping, what moved W&M from 33 to 24 in USN ranking?
If you have to choose between W&M and ND (USN 26, ATL 17), isn't ND a much better choice?
Thank you.
-
- Posts: 9180
- Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 3:14 am
Re: W&M Ranking
who cares about their ranking
w&m may be a "good regional school"
but with a 22.1% school-funded rate, they're playing hide the ball
that's the reason w&m does alright ranking-wise
no one actually believes w&m is a top school that has 75.6% LT/FT JD-required
the true employment figures show you have about a coinflip chance at LT/FT JD-required graduating from there
w&m may be a "good regional school"
but with a 22.1% school-funded rate, they're playing hide the ball
that's the reason w&m does alright ranking-wise
no one actually believes w&m is a top school that has 75.6% LT/FT JD-required
the true employment figures show you have about a coinflip chance at LT/FT JD-required graduating from there
-
- Posts: 9180
- Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 3:14 am
Re: W&M Ranking
also to speak the w&m vs nd thing
it would come down to where you want to practice, there's no reason to compare two regional schools in different areas unless you want to practice in both areas
if you really did want to practice in both areas and had equal costs, nd would be a no-brainer
it would come down to where you want to practice, there's no reason to compare two regional schools in different areas unless you want to practice in both areas
if you really did want to practice in both areas and had equal costs, nd would be a no-brainer
-
- Posts: 140
- Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2014 10:10 pm
Re: W&M Ranking
Brut,
Thank you so much. You prompted me to look at employment rank. Wow
Thank you so much. You prompted me to look at employment rank. Wow
- cron1834
- Posts: 2299
- Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:36 am
Re: W&M Ranking
Brut is right... You shouldn't worry about rankings at all. Rankings only matter insofar as they help you get a job, so you may as well just cut out the middle man and look at jobs. W&M is reasonable if you have a) full tuition or damn close b) history in Virginia and c) willingness to do something other than biglaw. If you don't have those things, then don't do it. I suppose rich parents are always a complication if relevant.
The same is true for ND, tho relaxed a little bc ND is better. Brut is also right that it's strange to be considering both schools. ND places better, but it's not a legit national school.
I think you're fetishizing rankings here. Don't worry about them. Extremely large differences in rank are a good proxy for jobs (ie, Tier 1 vs Tier 3-4), but within pretty large bands the rankings are essentially meaningless, except for bragging rights. Bragging rights are cool, but not worth hundreds of thousands of dollars.
The same is true for ND, tho relaxed a little bc ND is better. Brut is also right that it's strange to be considering both schools. ND places better, but it's not a legit national school.
I think you're fetishizing rankings here. Don't worry about them. Extremely large differences in rank are a good proxy for jobs (ie, Tier 1 vs Tier 3-4), but within pretty large bands the rankings are essentially meaningless, except for bragging rights. Bragging rights are cool, but not worth hundreds of thousands of dollars.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 932
- Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2014 11:41 pm
Re: W&M Ranking
I agree with what has been said so far, but would like to add my two cents.
When you analyze employment numbers and emphasize Biglaw and clerkship placement, you notice that there are several tiers of schools. You have the T13, which has excellent employment. Outside of the elite schools, you have a group comprised of Georgetown, UCLA, Vandy, UT and USC, which place between 30 and 50 percent of its students in the aforementioned categories, depending on the year.
Outside of that tier, there is yet another tier comprised of strong regional schools that have decent employment numbers. ND is in this tier, whereas I don't think WM is. Generally, ND has better employment numbers than WM, and it's really not that close. So while you shouldn't move across the country and pay sticker to go to a school like ND, I do not believe it makes that much sense to lump ND and WM in the same category. I'm sure some will argue that 30% Biglaw placement is not a game-changer, but I think that it should be noted that schools like BU, BC, ND, USC, etc. at least give you a fighting chance for Biglaw/clerkships. WM is a good school but Biglaw is very unlikely.
When you analyze employment numbers and emphasize Biglaw and clerkship placement, you notice that there are several tiers of schools. You have the T13, which has excellent employment. Outside of the elite schools, you have a group comprised of Georgetown, UCLA, Vandy, UT and USC, which place between 30 and 50 percent of its students in the aforementioned categories, depending on the year.
Outside of that tier, there is yet another tier comprised of strong regional schools that have decent employment numbers. ND is in this tier, whereas I don't think WM is. Generally, ND has better employment numbers than WM, and it's really not that close. So while you shouldn't move across the country and pay sticker to go to a school like ND, I do not believe it makes that much sense to lump ND and WM in the same category. I'm sure some will argue that 30% Biglaw placement is not a game-changer, but I think that it should be noted that schools like BU, BC, ND, USC, etc. at least give you a fighting chance for Biglaw/clerkships. WM is a good school but Biglaw is very unlikely.
-
- Posts: 140
- Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2014 10:10 pm
Re: W&M Ranking
Hello everybody. Again, I am looking at W&M employment numbers for 2013 and comparing it to other schools. Is my understanding correct that you are positioned well to have a good job if you are in top 25% as 25% are employed in 51 + attorneys firms, half of this top 25% are employed at 501 + firms? So, Biglaw is still possible out of W&M. I appreciate your thoughts.
- Johann
- Posts: 19704
- Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 4:25 pm
Re: W&M Ranking
If it's anything like most schools, prolly more like top 10% positioned and 10% with connections and 5% very likeable, good interviewer Firm goes out on a limb for etc
-
- Posts: 78
- Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2014 8:00 pm
Re: W&M Ranking
don't go to any school not in t-14
- MistakenGenius
- Posts: 824
- Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:18 pm
Post removed.
Post removed.
Last edited by MistakenGenius on Sun Dec 13, 2015 9:19 am, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Posts: 78
- Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2014 8:00 pm
Re: W&M Ranking
lol. retake opMistakenGenius wrote:This is just stupid. There are plenty of regions to go to strong regionals.NYCFAN1 wrote:don't go to any school not in t-14
- gatesome
- Posts: 412
- Joined: Wed May 02, 2012 7:43 pm
Re: W&M Ranking
a lower-credentialed entering class means it may be easier to be the top 25%, 10%, 1% whatever of your class
and from what I have gathered from lurking OCI threads, class rank means a more than school rank when it comes to job placement
and from what I have gathered from lurking OCI threads, class rank means a more than school rank when it comes to job placement
-
- Posts: 140
- Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2014 10:10 pm
Re: W&M Ranking
Thank you for all the replies. Gatesome, this is what I am trying to determine: the balance between the class rank and the school rank. The higher school rank means the lower class rank. The lower school rank means the higher class rank. What is more important for employment? NYCFAN, I did retake this September.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 932
- Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2014 11:41 pm
Re: W&M Ranking
If you are in the top 25%, sure, you'll have a pretty good shot at getting either Biglaw or a clerkship. But being in the 25% is not easy no matter which school you attend. I think W&M is only worth it if you get a sizable scholarship and want to live in Virginia.
- moonman157
- Posts: 1040
- Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2011 10:26 pm
Re: W&M Ranking
This is so wrong. There is a much greater gap in terms of job prospers out of schools than there is between the quality of students you're competing against. Is it easier to get top 25% at a T1 than it is at a T14? Probably (though there's a lot of luck and randomness involved in exams). But the quality of opportunities between T14 and everything else (for most jobs) is very significant. There are very solid regional schools that you can justify attending at a very low cost, but don't try to gauge the quality of your competition in law school as a factor in your decision making.gatesome wrote:a lower-credentialed entering class means it may be easier to be the top 25%, 10%, 1% whatever of your class
and from what I have gathered from lurking OCI threads, class rank means a more than school rank when it comes to job placement
Plus, at this point, I think a lot of it comes down to people's willingness to retake the LSAT, not their inherent intelligence. Assume you'll be median at any school you attend, and see if that will open up the kinds of doors you want.
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: W&M Ranking
You can't just say "Oh, 50% of the people at this school get big law, I just need to finish in the top 50% of the class and I'll get big law." It doesn't really work like that. Firms obviously have cut offs, etc. but in this example there will be people who are in the bottom 50% of the class that get big law (whether because nepotism, good work experience, great interviewer, breath-taking hotness, diversity bump, etc.) and people at the top of the class could very well strike out (whether because horrible interviewer, obnoxious, really socially awkward, etc.)
-
- Posts: 932
- Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2014 11:41 pm
Re: W&M Ranking
Can't argue with that. If 25% of people get Biglaw at a given school, being in the top 25% is usually necessary but not sufficient.BigZuck wrote:You can't just say "Oh, 50% of the people at this school get big law, I just need to finish in the top 50% of the class and I'll get big law." It doesn't really work like that. Firms obviously have cut offs, etc. but in this example there will be people who are in the bottom 50% of the class that get big law (whether because nepotism, good work experience, great interviewer, breath-taking hotness, diversity bump, etc.) and people at the top of the class could very well strike out (whether because horrible interviewer, obnoxious, really socially awkward, etc.)
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 9180
- Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 3:14 am
Re: W&M Ranking
good thing you're applying to study law and not mathMoneytrees wrote:Can't argue with that. If 25% of people get Biglaw at a given school, being in the top 25% is usually necessary but not sufficient.BigZuck wrote:You can't just say "Oh, 50% of the people at this school get big law, I just need to finish in the top 50% of the class and I'll get big law." It doesn't really work like that. Firms obviously have cut offs, etc. but in this example there will be people who are in the bottom 50% of the class that get big law (whether because nepotism, good work experience, great interviewer, breath-taking hotness, diversity bump, etc.) and people at the top of the class could very well strike out (whether because horrible interviewer, obnoxious, really socially awkward, etc.)
- TheSpanishMain
- Posts: 4744
- Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2013 2:26 pm
Re: W&M Ranking
So, for example, you'd tell a Texas native who wants to stay in the state that UT with a full ride is a bad decision? Okay.NYCFAN1 wrote:lol. retake opMistakenGenius wrote:This is just stupid. There are plenty of regions to go to strong regionals.NYCFAN1 wrote:don't go to any school not in t-14
-
- Posts: 932
- Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2014 11:41 pm
Re: W&M Ranking
?Brut wrote:good thing you're applying to study law and not mathMoneytrees wrote:Can't argue with that. If 25% of people get Biglaw at a given school, being in the top 25% is usually necessary but not sufficient.BigZuck wrote:You can't just say "Oh, 50% of the people at this school get big law, I just need to finish in the top 50% of the class and I'll get big law." It doesn't really work like that. Firms obviously have cut offs, etc. but in this example there will be people who are in the bottom 50% of the class that get big law (whether because nepotism, good work experience, great interviewer, breath-taking hotness, diversity bump, etc.) and people at the top of the class could very well strike out (whether because horrible interviewer, obnoxious, really socially awkward, etc.)
-
- Posts: 9180
- Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 3:14 am
Re: W&M Ranking
Moneytrees wrote:?
think about itMoneytrees wrote:If 25% of people get Biglaw at a given school, being in the top 25% is usually necessary but not sufficient.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 932
- Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2014 11:41 pm
Re: W&M Ranking
I fail to see your point. As Big Zuck said, there are always some students that are able to get Biglaw through connections/preferential
treatment. Hypothetically, if W&M has a 100 person class and about 25 go into Biglaw every year, it's essential to be one of the top 25 students in your class, but it's not sufficient (this is all assuming that you are an average student with no connections). I'm guessing you would probably need to be in the top 10 percent to be sure of getting one of those jobs.
treatment. Hypothetically, if W&M has a 100 person class and about 25 go into Biglaw every year, it's essential to be one of the top 25 students in your class, but it's not sufficient (this is all assuming that you are an average student with no connections). I'm guessing you would probably need to be in the top 10 percent to be sure of getting one of those jobs.
-
- Posts: 9180
- Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 3:14 am
Re: W&M Ranking
imagine 100 people in front of you
imagine that 25 of them get biglaw
you cannot both hold that being one of the top 25 students is necessary to get biglaw AND hold that it's not sufficient
imagine that 25 of them get biglaw
you cannot both hold that being one of the top 25 students is necessary to get biglaw AND hold that it's not sufficient
-
- Posts: 932
- Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2014 11:41 pm
Re: W&M Ranking
But that's not what I'm saying.
100 people in a class.
25 get Biglaw.
What I'm saying is that if you are a typical student with no connections, you need to be one of the top 25 students in your graduating class to have a shot at being one of the 25 chosen for Biglaw. Because if you aren't, you not only are going up against least 25 students that have better grades than you, but you also have to deal with the handful of students that have connections to firms. So I would argue that it's pretty much necessary to be in top 25, but that it's not sufficient, cause that student ranked n.60 with a connection to a big firm might nab your spot.
100 people in a class.
25 get Biglaw.
What I'm saying is that if you are a typical student with no connections, you need to be one of the top 25 students in your graduating class to have a shot at being one of the 25 chosen for Biglaw. Because if you aren't, you not only are going up against least 25 students that have better grades than you, but you also have to deal with the handful of students that have connections to firms. So I would argue that it's pretty much necessary to be in top 25, but that it's not sufficient, cause that student ranked n.60 with a connection to a big firm might nab your spot.
- Tiago Splitter
- Posts: 17148
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:20 am
Re: W&M Ranking
For God's sake moneytrees: If it's necessary to be in the top 25 people can't get it unless they are in the top 25.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login