are all LORs so general or is mine weak?
Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2013 12:26 am
I asked a professor if he could give me a letter of recommendation.
He agreed, saying that he would be happy to recommend me as I was the best student in the class.
I actually had done continuously well in the class- i had bonus points left over from a perfect score, I lead a debate to win, I received great peer evaluation.
I told him the procedures but he said he had no problem with showing me a copy of the LOR before he sent it.
So today, I read it but the problem with it in my perspective was that it was too general.
I took the class last year so maybe the time gap was a problem but the content wasn't very detailed. He basically said 'She is a great student. I recommend her.' but which LOR doesn't say that?
He said I wrote good essays etc. and included the things i did well but to me, the points seemed too vague and read suspiciously, it could be read that the professor didn't actually remember me since my good points weren't emphasized persuasively enough. I actually thought he would be the best professor to write me a strong LOR since my actual performance reflected it, so this is quite disappointing. To me I wasn't really persuaded by my own recommendation so I'm worried it might seem to be just bullshit by the law schools.
I've never actually read a really good LOR so I'm not sure if this is a problem with all LORs or if it's a problem with me. The professor prepared all of the envelopes and forms so I don't think I can request an editing. I don't think he has had much experience with writing LORs so this might also be a reason but there's nothing i can do about that.
Is this a weak LOR or is this what all LORs are like? Should I look for a different LOR instead of this one?
I'm shooting for HYS and my softs aren't very strong so i think i will need a good LOR.
Oh and another question: the professor thought it would be a good idea to include a persuasive prose I wrote in the class and we included it- is this a good idea?
He agreed, saying that he would be happy to recommend me as I was the best student in the class.
I actually had done continuously well in the class- i had bonus points left over from a perfect score, I lead a debate to win, I received great peer evaluation.
I told him the procedures but he said he had no problem with showing me a copy of the LOR before he sent it.
So today, I read it but the problem with it in my perspective was that it was too general.
I took the class last year so maybe the time gap was a problem but the content wasn't very detailed. He basically said 'She is a great student. I recommend her.' but which LOR doesn't say that?
He said I wrote good essays etc. and included the things i did well but to me, the points seemed too vague and read suspiciously, it could be read that the professor didn't actually remember me since my good points weren't emphasized persuasively enough. I actually thought he would be the best professor to write me a strong LOR since my actual performance reflected it, so this is quite disappointing. To me I wasn't really persuaded by my own recommendation so I'm worried it might seem to be just bullshit by the law schools.
I've never actually read a really good LOR so I'm not sure if this is a problem with all LORs or if it's a problem with me. The professor prepared all of the envelopes and forms so I don't think I can request an editing. I don't think he has had much experience with writing LORs so this might also be a reason but there's nothing i can do about that.
Is this a weak LOR or is this what all LORs are like? Should I look for a different LOR instead of this one?
I'm shooting for HYS and my softs aren't very strong so i think i will need a good LOR.
Oh and another question: the professor thought it would be a good idea to include a persuasive prose I wrote in the class and we included it- is this a good idea?