difference between 2.95 and 3.0 GPA for super splitter
Posted: Fri Jul 26, 2013 6:05 pm
I have read over and over again that having a 3.0 LSDAS gpa is worlds away from having anything less, even like a 2.99 even if you have a decent lsat -- like 172/173-ish
I am trying to confirm this, but there's so few data points that i am now turning to TLS for thoughts on just how much difference it makes.
I am calculating a 2.95 GPA, lsdas. I'm wondering if it would be worth fighting tooth and nail to find SOME way to get it up just that tiny tiny bit--i'm talking like petitions, hundreds of hours pouring over school bylaws, pestering the registrar—basically, since I graduated a while ago, it would be a huge hassle for no guarantee of a payoff.
If a 2.95 is comparable to a 3.0, I might not go through all of the trouble (like, I'm talking a LOT of trouble, and it might all be for nothing). But if that extra .05 point will make a huge difference, like maybe getting me into a t-14 that's not northwestern (not that anything is wrong with NU, it's great, but I love me some options).
IS there a significant difference between 2.95 and 3.0? I realize that if it's the difference between taking one more class or not, or another semester or whatever for some people, i should do it. But I am all graduated, so it would entail doing lots of research and hoping for a loophole or a petition or some other hail mary solution.
One more thing... I have two other acquaintances who just recently sent in their transcripts. They both are well in the 3.xx range, but they both independently mentioned that when they calculated their lsdas gpa, it was slightly different than the lsac calcualted their gpa. I'm making up numbers, but one said that the calculated their gpa to be something like 3.48 and the LSAC gave them a 3.5 and the other said that they calculated a 3.39 and the lsac gave them a 3.4
Maybe there were math errors, or maybe the calculator they used online rounds difference, or whatever, but I'm hoping that the LSAC just calculates to the tenths column and my 2.95 will round up to a 3.0, but I'm not really counting on that. But does anyone know for sure? Kind of a coincidence that two people may have made math errors and then in reality had a 3.4 and a 3.5 (round numbers).
Thanks for any insight, everyone!!
I am trying to confirm this, but there's so few data points that i am now turning to TLS for thoughts on just how much difference it makes.
I am calculating a 2.95 GPA, lsdas. I'm wondering if it would be worth fighting tooth and nail to find SOME way to get it up just that tiny tiny bit--i'm talking like petitions, hundreds of hours pouring over school bylaws, pestering the registrar—basically, since I graduated a while ago, it would be a huge hassle for no guarantee of a payoff.
If a 2.95 is comparable to a 3.0, I might not go through all of the trouble (like, I'm talking a LOT of trouble, and it might all be for nothing). But if that extra .05 point will make a huge difference, like maybe getting me into a t-14 that's not northwestern (not that anything is wrong with NU, it's great, but I love me some options).
IS there a significant difference between 2.95 and 3.0? I realize that if it's the difference between taking one more class or not, or another semester or whatever for some people, i should do it. But I am all graduated, so it would entail doing lots of research and hoping for a loophole or a petition or some other hail mary solution.
One more thing... I have two other acquaintances who just recently sent in their transcripts. They both are well in the 3.xx range, but they both independently mentioned that when they calculated their lsdas gpa, it was slightly different than the lsac calcualted their gpa. I'm making up numbers, but one said that the calculated their gpa to be something like 3.48 and the LSAC gave them a 3.5 and the other said that they calculated a 3.39 and the lsac gave them a 3.4
Maybe there were math errors, or maybe the calculator they used online rounds difference, or whatever, but I'm hoping that the LSAC just calculates to the tenths column and my 2.95 will round up to a 3.0, but I'm not really counting on that. But does anyone know for sure? Kind of a coincidence that two people may have made math errors and then in reality had a 3.4 and a 3.5 (round numbers).
Thanks for any insight, everyone!!