GPA rounding?
Posted: Wed Jul 24, 2013 12:18 pm
edit
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=213675
They put your GPA to the hundredth: 3.XX. They round up/down the third digit using normal math rules.meadow201 wrote:did LSAC round up or down your GPAs?
I had a 3.714 that was rounded down to a 3.71. I don't have anything more official than that.meadow201 wrote:source? Because I've received conflicting information regarding rounding: one person says they round up if >=7, another says they truncate, and those like you who say >=5.ImNoScar wrote:They put your GPA to the hundredth: 3.XX. They round up/down the third digit using normal math rules.meadow201 wrote:did LSAC round up or down your GPAs?
I've read in a few threads (testimonies) that they round up from an X.XX7. As in, if you have a 3.5069, that becomes a 3.500. but if you have a 3.507, that become a 3.51. I've mentioned recently that my actual calls to LSAC about this issue were met with massive confusion about how math worked in general and subsequently, no real answer.ImNoScar wrote:They put your GPA to the hundredth: 3.XX. They round up/down the third digit using normal math rules.meadow201 wrote:did LSAC round up or down your GPAs?
They got confusing because she didn't seem to think it was even mathematically possible for a GPA to ever be X.XXX, that they were default X.XX. After about 10 minutes of my explanations falling short, I accepted her answer and consulted the internet.meadow201 wrote:so what's the final word? did your calls with LSAC get contentious when they thought you were asking the same question? I noticed you said "calls" in the pluralCyanIdes Of March wrote:I've read in a few threads (testimonies) that they round up from an X.XX7. As in, if you have a 3.5069, that becomes a 3.500. but if you have a 3.507, that become a 3.51. I've mentioned recently that my actual calls to LSAC about this issue were met with massive confusion about how math worked in general and subsequently, no real answer.ImNoScar wrote:They put your GPA to the hundredth: 3.XX. They round up/down the third digit using normal math rules.meadow201 wrote:did LSAC round up or down your GPAs?
Pretty short sighted statement. It can make a difference in a lot of scenarios. For instance, if you are trying to make sure you meet a school's GPA floor, and you are deciding what/how many classes to take. You could do the math and see that another course would help you meet that goal or not, and that extra class might put you just above or just under the rounding point, depending on what it happens to be.Bildungsroman wrote:Who gives a shit? Just submit your transcripts and see what you get. I don't see how anything you do would change depending on where the rounding occurs if it does at all.
No, that's stupid. I am skeptical that anyone will ever find herself in a situation where this question changes a decision she would make. OP probably just asked because he's neurotic.CyanIdes Of March wrote:Pretty short sighted statement. It can make a difference in a lot of scenarios. For instance, if you are trying to make sure you meet a school's GPA floor, and you are deciding what/how many classes to take. You could do the math and see that another course would help you meet that goal or not, and that extra class might put you just above or just under the rounding point, depending on what it happens to be.Bildungsroman wrote:Who gives a shit? Just submit your transcripts and see what you get. I don't see how anything you do would change depending on where the rounding occurs if it does at all.
But I basically just told you that this situation happened to me and it did change a decision I made. It's not stupid, it's strategic. A point, at certain GPA ranges, could conceivably change an outcome. It's an empirically observable fact.Bildungsroman wrote:No, that's stupid. I am skeptical that anyone will ever find herself in a situation where this question changes a decision she would make. OP probably just asked because he's neurotic.CyanIdes Of March wrote:Pretty short sighted statement. It can make a difference in a lot of scenarios. For instance, if you are trying to make sure you meet a school's GPA floor, and you are deciding what/how many classes to take. You could do the math and see that another course would help you meet that goal or not, and that extra class might put you just above or just under the rounding point, depending on what it happens to be.Bildungsroman wrote:Who gives a shit? Just submit your transcripts and see what you get. I don't see how anything you do would change depending on where the rounding occurs if it does at all.
For Y, there's a big difference between a 3.89 and a 3.90. At both Y and S, there's a big difference between a 3.79 and a 3.80. I believe the former is the poster's dilemma. Worrying about .01 would be neurotic behavior in most cases, but there are absolutely instances in which it's a legitimate concern.Bildungsroman wrote:No, that's stupid. I am skeptical that anyone will ever find herself in a situation where this question changes a decision she would make. OP probably just asked because he's neurotic.CyanIdes Of March wrote:Pretty short sighted statement. It can make a difference in a lot of scenarios. For instance, if you are trying to make sure you meet a school's GPA floor, and you are deciding what/how many classes to take. You could do the math and see that another course would help you meet that goal or not, and that extra class might put you just above or just under the rounding point, depending on what it happens to be.Bildungsroman wrote:Who gives a shit? Just submit your transcripts and see what you get. I don't see how anything you do would change depending on where the rounding occurs if it does at all.
After reading this thread I thought my lsac gpa would be truncated, but it was rounded up. It was an X.XX91 and was rounded up. If that isn't clear enough I'll use some fake numbers: 3.4891 >> 3.49meadow201 wrote:
now that we've settled this, can we move onto cold hard facts about rounding? e.g., anecdotal evidence of whether LSAC rounded you up? because a forum search is all over the place on this issue
I don't think semesters should matter because cumulative is just: (total quality points/total quality hours). It shouldn't matter whether or not your semester gpas were rounded because they won't use those numbers in the calculation of the cumulative, if that makes sense.meadow201 wrote:yea good to hear. what about semester by semester? I had one semester that was #.##[5 or 6] which was rounded up. the cumulative was #.##[7 or 8] and that was also rounded up.t-14orbust wrote:After reading this thread I thought my lsac gpa would be truncated, but it was rounded up. It was an X.XX91 and was rounded up. If that isn't clear enough I'll use some fake numbers: 3.4891 >> 3.49meadow201 wrote:
now that we've settled this, can we move onto cold hard facts about rounding? e.g., anecdotal evidence of whether LSAC rounded you up? because a forum search is all over the place on this issue
edit: This occurred for both my cumulative and degree gpa, which are exactly the same.
Why would this thread make you think your GPA would be truncated when the anecdotal evidence cuts both ways?