DIII Athlete=Good Soft?
Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2013 10:49 pm
thanks
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=212386
Being African-American will help you more on your law school applications than if you were a gold medalist in the Olympics probably.AfricanGal wrote:@californiauser
No, I'm not a white South African, parents are immigrants from Nigeria. And I understand where you're coming from. I'm really just worried about not having softs because I'm really not good at any thing else in particular, but I don't want to take the chance of doing poorly in college just for the sake of a sport. Atm, I'm shooting for a 3.5 GPA, but I'm not even sure that will be enough to save me.
Sub 3.0 is dangerous grounds for all applicants, but for URMs especially. I think you just need to do some soul searching and figure our whether a sport is something you really want to do. If you're already way below the 3.0 line and can't reasonably expect to get above it, it may not be worth it to quit.AfricanGal wrote:@californiauser
No, I'm not a white South African, parents are immigrants from Nigeria. And I understand where you're coming from. I'm really just worried about not having softs because I'm really not good at any thing else in particular, but I don't want to take the chance of doing poorly in college just for the sake of a sport. Atm, I'm shooting for a 3.5 GPA, but I'm not even sure that will be enough to save me.
if you are still a freshman right now, or just about to start your sophomore year, you have a really good opportunity to get your grades up above the 3.0 mark. but you have to keep in mind that you MUST work your ass off for the next 3 years of college. that is a real commitment and you need to sit down and organize your life, yesterday. figure out good places for you to study, figure out a schedule for you to study regularly, and make sure you stay on top of your grades. i'm only saying this because i wish someone would have said that to me when i had the chance to get my shit in orderAfricanGal wrote:I have sometime to boost my gpa (it's a 2.27 though) and I'll only be a sophomore this coming fall, not sure I mentioned that.
This. D-III athlete status doesn't help much.UnderrateOverachieve wrote:Being African-American will help you more on your law school applications than if you were a gold medalist in the Olympics probably.AfricanGal wrote:@californiauser
No, I'm not a white South African, parents are immigrants from Nigeria. And I understand where you're coming from. I'm really just worried about not having softs because I'm really not good at any thing else in particular, but I don't want to take the chance of doing poorly in college just for the sake of a sport. Atm, I'm shooting for a 3.5 GPA, but I'm not even sure that will be enough to save me.
romothesavior wrote:This. D-III athlete status doesn't help much.UnderrateOverachieve wrote:Being African-American will help you more on your law school applications than if you were a gold medalist in the Olympics probably.AfricanGal wrote:@californiauser
No, I'm not a white South African, parents are immigrants from Nigeria. And I understand where you're coming from. I'm really just worried about not having softs because I'm really not good at any thing else in particular, but I don't want to take the chance of doing poorly in college just for the sake of a sport. Atm, I'm shooting for a 3.5 GPA, but I'm not even sure that will be enough to save me.
Being a URM provides a really solid boost, so you have that going for you. You need to get your GPA WAY up (how is a 2.27 even possible?) and you need to study hard for the LSAT. LSAT/GPA is really all that should matter to you right now if you want to go law school.
i don't know enough to speculate how being a top athlete would factor in an admissions decision, but i am confident in saying that being a top performer in DIII is not considered a top athlete. not meant to be offensive, just being realisticnerv wrote:I don't know enough about your personal circumstances to make a strong recommendation about what you should do, but if you actually have a legitimate shot of making a national team, I would imagine it could make up for some pretty bad numbers. I'm not sure exactly how much leeway that would get you, but as an example, the author of prozac nation got into yale with an lsat in the 150s or 160s, and she wasn't a minority either. Maybe admissions officers would see being a top athlete and a well-known author in a similar way.
mojangles wrote:i don't know enough to speculate how being a top athlete would factor in an admissions decision, but i am confident in saying that being a top performer in DIII is not considered a top athlete. not meant to be offensive, just being realisticnerv wrote:I don't know enough about your personal circumstances to make a strong recommendation about what you should do, but if you actually have a legitimate shot of making a national team, I would imagine it could make up for some pretty bad numbers. I'm not sure exactly how much leeway that would get you, but as an example, the author of prozac nation got into yale with an lsat in the 150s or 160s, and she wasn't a minority either. Maybe admissions officers would see being a top athlete and a well-known author in a similar way.
I don't think he was saying that to look down on your talent or your experiences, he was just talking about it from the perspective of admissions. Being a DIII athlete may be a very small boost in admissions, but no one is going to look at your application and say "Wow, this person is a top athlete" and throw you to the top of the stack, like say, a famous author.AfricanGal wrote:The times I've posted for the sport I'm involved in are fairly close to top DI programs. I passed up an offer with a DI school that is currently second in the nation in order to attend a more affordable, prestigious college, and I wasn't particularly sure if I wanted to continue playing after high school. Either way I've still got a long way to go before being at that level, but from what I've heard from coaches it's very achievable for me.
If I were you, I would probably continue to play the sport if it was something I enjoyed doing, not because there is a small chance that I could make the olympic team which would then give me a boost in law school admissions or whatever. There is way too much uncertainty going down that path such as injuries, poor performance, or just things out of your control that might potentially lead you to having poor grades and a bunch of time invested in an activity that didn't really get you anything tangible.AfricanGal wrote:mojangles wrote:i don't know enough to speculate how being a top athlete would factor in an admissions decision, but i am confident in saying that being a top performer in DIII is not considered a top athlete. not meant to be offensive, just being realisticnerv wrote:I don't know enough about your personal circumstances to make a strong recommendation about what you should do, but if you actually have a legitimate shot of making a national team, I would imagine it could make up for some pretty bad numbers. I'm not sure exactly how much leeway that would get you, but as an example, the author of prozac nation got into yale with an lsat in the 150s or 160s, and she wasn't a minority either. Maybe admissions officers would see being a top athlete and a well-known author in a similar way.
The times I've posted for the sport I'm involved in are fairly close to top DI programs. I passed up an offer with a DI school that is currently second in the nation in order to attend a more affordable, prestigious college, and I wasn't particularly sure if I wanted to continue playing after high school. Either way I've still got a long way to go before being at that level, but from what I've heard from coaches it's very achievable for me.