non-degree related transcript - send or not?
Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2013 10:51 pm
I've taken classes at a community college C outside of my regular university U. I took a some classes at C before U and after U. Here's my record:
2002-2004
D in Algebra II
W in elem piano 2
3 As in 3 piano classes
2013
A in Business law
This is how I see it:
1. Sending the transcript won't concretely help me
2. Not sending the transcript can hurt me.
3. But sending could hurt as well
factors:
1. Transcript itself isn't worthy of doing any concrete help. It may say, this student took a class after his bachelor's and it was law related. This might be a really slight positive since I'm a neuroscience major.
2. One of my 2 letters of rec will be from the business law class I took this year. So having this letter from a professor from college C without having a record of study at college C is likely to confuse the reader/hurt me if the reader pays attention to where the letter came from.
3. But sending is likely to seriously & concretely hurt me if it counts the D and W in my lsac gpa. My gpa is bad - Uni's all gpa is 3.533, and lsac gpa is low 3.3 (I calced it a while ago by hand, don't have exact fig now)
At the law school forum I asked about this - and couple of the people, one specifically from Irvine and another from Davis I think - said "we just want your transcripts working towards your degree." So there doesn't seem to be a clear-cut rule mandating I list every transcript I have ever had.
lsac tells me I can't edit my institutions after I submit the initial list after buying the credentials service. So I feel like I am at a fork. What do you guys think about the effects of listing C vs not listing C? Does anyone know if the grades from 2002 don't really matter, or if they do still matter? And what do you recommend?
Thanks for reading!
2002-2004
D in Algebra II
W in elem piano 2
3 As in 3 piano classes
2013
A in Business law
This is how I see it:
1. Sending the transcript won't concretely help me
2. Not sending the transcript can hurt me.
3. But sending could hurt as well
factors:
1. Transcript itself isn't worthy of doing any concrete help. It may say, this student took a class after his bachelor's and it was law related. This might be a really slight positive since I'm a neuroscience major.
2. One of my 2 letters of rec will be from the business law class I took this year. So having this letter from a professor from college C without having a record of study at college C is likely to confuse the reader/hurt me if the reader pays attention to where the letter came from.
3. But sending is likely to seriously & concretely hurt me if it counts the D and W in my lsac gpa. My gpa is bad - Uni's all gpa is 3.533, and lsac gpa is low 3.3 (I calced it a while ago by hand, don't have exact fig now)
At the law school forum I asked about this - and couple of the people, one specifically from Irvine and another from Davis I think - said "we just want your transcripts working towards your degree." So there doesn't seem to be a clear-cut rule mandating I list every transcript I have ever had.
lsac tells me I can't edit my institutions after I submit the initial list after buying the credentials service. So I feel like I am at a fork. What do you guys think about the effects of listing C vs not listing C? Does anyone know if the grades from 2002 don't really matter, or if they do still matter? And what do you recommend?
Thanks for reading!