*
Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 12:53 am
.
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=211744
You sound delightful.Kobaine51 wrote:As misguided as you may think it is, it's actually a useful question to ask. Obviously I'm studying for a 180, but there are other numbers I would settle for. 177 would still be very useful for me. Knowing a floor for admission will allow me to choose wether or not to take the test, based on practice scores. I do not need to apply this year, but I will if I have a reasonable chance of admission based on practicing at or above some floor I set based on the information I get from people on this forum.Clearlynotstefan wrote:Do not write a gpa addendum to explain a few b's. Google law school numbers. Has everything you need. As far as the lsat, it's a common question, but also misguided around here, you don't pick a score, then study...you study as best you can, earn your score, then pick a school. Study for 180. Don't settle.
Law school numbers is useful, and I've interpreted the data myself, but I want to know what other people perceive as the floor to add to my stock of information.
I asked for a specific answer, not a lecture. I do not care what you think for anything other than what I asked.
The OP was open to Chicago the last time he made this thread, I wonder what happened?2014 wrote:Egregious anti Chicago trolling going on in this thread, does not compute
self-selectionCanIGetAnAmen wrote:How come Columbia grads on average make more money than HYS?
I'm going to guess OP went to Chicago based on the "top-5 known for grade deflation" description from his other thread.Regulus wrote:How much time did you spend abroad? If it wasn't more than a year, then those grades likely won't count towards your LSDAS GPA.
Also, if your goal is HYSC, and you know what it takes to get into these schools, you are heading in the wrong direction. You had a 3.79 last time you asked this question, and now you're at a 3.71. Upward trends show that someone has matured and figured out the importance of school, whereas downward trends show just the opposite.
Because payscale uses shit data to compute the unsurprisingly shit analysis on such mattersCanIGetAnAmen wrote:Why do Columbia grads on average make more money than HYS?
Why would you say something so plainly unpleasant to the first person who responded to your request? Being a kind, friendly person is probably ten times more important to your career than your LSAT score. People will be more willing to hire you, work with you, promote you, invite you out to drinks, etc., if you're the kind of person who can thank people for their advice even if you found it unhelpful or unnecessary.Kobaine51 wrote:...Clearlynotstefan wrote:Do not write a gpa addendum to explain a few b's. Google law school numbers. Has everything you need. As far as the lsat, it's a common question, but also misguided around here, you don't pick a score, then study...you study as best you can, earn your score, then pick a school. Study for 180. Don't settle.
I asked for a specific answer, not a lecture. I do not care what you think for anything other than what I asked.
Sorry, it's a forgettable city and a forgettable school.2014 wrote:Egregious anti Chicago trolling going on in this thread, does not compute
On what measure?CanIGetAnAmen wrote:Why do Columbia grads on average make more money than HYS?
Columbia is #1 for mean pay out of law school according to the actual forbes ranking. Stanford is #1 for mid career.Ling520 wrote:On what measure?CanIGetAnAmen wrote:Why do Columbia grads on average make more money than HYS?
http://www.forbes.com/sites/kurtbadenha ... ting-rich/
"The best school if you want to get paid well is Stanford Law School, which tops our list with mid-career median pay of $236,000."
The more recent editions of that article give the same results: http://www.forbes.com/pictures/efkk45eg ... -school-2/jbagelboy wrote:Columbia is #1 for mean pay out of law school according to the actual forbes ranking. Stanford is #1 for mid career.Ling520 wrote:On what measure?CanIGetAnAmen wrote:Why do Columbia grads on average make more money than HYS?
http://www.forbes.com/sites/kurtbadenha ... ting-rich/
"The best school if you want to get paid well is Stanford Law School, which tops our list with mid-career median pay of $236,000."
Columbia dominates the out of LS figure because more HYS kids get prestigious fed clerkships, which are lower paying than market salary at large NYC firms.
I think jbagelboy covered it with the prestigious fed clerkships.untar614 wrote:The more recent editions of that article give the same results: http://www.forbes.com/pictures/efkk45eg ... -school-2/jbagelboy wrote:Columbia is #1 for mean pay out of law school according to the actual forbes ranking. Stanford is #1 for mid career.Ling520 wrote:On what measure?CanIGetAnAmen wrote:Why do Columbia grads on average make more money than HYS?
http://www.forbes.com/sites/kurtbadenha ... ting-rich/
"The best school if you want to get paid well is Stanford Law School, which tops our list with mid-career median pay of $236,000."
Columbia dominates the out of LS figure because more HYS kids get prestigious fed clerkships, which are lower paying than market salary at large NYC firms.
Columbia has the top median pay right out of school, but HLS is the clear winner mid-career. In fact, CLS seems to lag several other schools in the mid-career pay metric. Any thoughts as to why this might be the case?
But why does Coumbia's mid-career median salary fall behind Chicago, UVA, Duke, Cornell, Northwestern and NYU's?Ling520 wrote:I think jbagelboy covered it with the prestigious fed clerkships.untar614 wrote:The more recent editions of that article give the same results: http://www.forbes.com/pictures/efkk45eg ... -school-2/jbagelboy wrote:
Columbia is #1 for mean pay out of law school according to the actual forbes ranking. Stanford is #1 for mid career.
Columbia dominates the out of LS figure because more HYS kids get prestigious fed clerkships, which are lower paying than market salary at large NYC firms.
Columbia has the top median pay right out of school, but HLS is the clear winner mid-career. In fact, CLS seems to lag several other schools in the mid-career pay metric. Any thoughts as to why this might be the case?
Ranked by mid-career:untar614 wrote:The more recent editions of that article give the same results: http://www.forbes.com/pictures/efkk45eg ... -school-2/
Columbia has the top median pay right out of school, but HLS is the clear winner mid-career. In fact, CLS seems to lag several other schools in the mid-career pay metric. Any thoughts as to why this might be the case?