Top Law Schools

I'm graduating this June and will be going back home to study the LSAT (for October). I've started thumbing through some of the prepbooks and will hopefully get on actually PT's soon. I understand the importance of the LSAT, and so I'm asking this question.

Should I be looking for a full time position while prepping for the test? I already have some solid job experiences (during summer, etc.) and am not sure if the three months position before applying will do me any good as opposed to getting a higher score on the LSAT.

I know people have noted that it's possible to do both--as in, work and study--but I've found myself incredibly exhausted after a 8-5 job day.

Let me know what the best option for me would be in the coming months.

Thanks!!

The danger with this is if you wind up having to retake and reapply the following cycle, you suddenly have a 2 year resume gap. That can be a problem. Lots of people work full time while they study. Personally I studied while working full time and landed a 173. Take a few PTs and see where you stand, but you should be able to make significant gains over the next 5 months even if you work 40hrs/week.

5 months is too little of a time to study.


If you start studying now, plan on taking it December.

Got my 173 with 5 months of total studying. I'd also strongly recommend you take in Oct so you can retake for the same cycle in Dec if you need to. If you sit for the first time in Dec and underperform you're going to be tempted to apply with the bad LSAT instead of sitting out a cycle, and that is a terrible place to be.

Plus, applying in late Oct >> applying in Jan

Just start studying right now and you should be in a very good place to sit for Oct.

@Cobretti

Thanks. Dr. Dre's recommendation was the first time I'd heard that my 5-month study plan is too short.

I will be signing up for both October and December--in case things go horribly wrong in Oct. Like you said, I'm hoping to get my applications out ASAP as opposed to waiting out until January.

Thanks.

I got a 179 on five months while working full-time an d taking a full course load and having a girlfriend. How badly do you all manage your time?

NoodleyOne wrote:I got a 179 on five months while working full-time an d taking a full course load and having a girlfriend. How badly do you all manage your time?

it's just the case that you are very smart

can I ask you if you would recommend having sex whilst studying for the LSAT?

Dr. Dre wrote:

NoodleyOne wrote:I got a 179 on five months while working full-time an d taking a full course load and having a girlfriend. How badly do you all manage your time?

it's just the case that you are very smart

can I ask you if you would recommend having sex whilst studying for the LSAT?

If you can find a way to prop up the book without it getting in the way, I say go for it.

NoodleyOne wrote:

Dr. Dre wrote:

NoodleyOne wrote:I got a 179 on five months while working full-time an d taking a full course load and having a girlfriend. How badly do you all manage your time?

it's just the case that you are very smart

can I ask you if you would recommend having sex whilst studying for the LSAT?

If you can find a way to prop up the book without it getting in the way, I say go for it.

I think my worry is, that after sex, whether it be in the next hour or day, I would be too tired to fully benefit from my studying.

3-6 months is the generally recommend prep time for the LSAT. The amount of time it takes isn't nearly as important as how many PTs you can do. If 3 months is long enough to knock out 20+ PTs as well as at least the Powerscore Bibles, then go ahead and take it in October.

Dr. Dre wrote:

NoodleyOne wrote:

Dr. Dre wrote:

NoodleyOne wrote:I got a 179 on five months while working full-time an d taking a full course load and having a girlfriend. How badly do you all manage your time?

it's just the case that you are very smart

can I ask you if you would recommend having sex whilst studying for the LSAT?

If you can find a way to prop up the book without it getting in the way, I say go for it.

I think my worry is, that after sex, whether it be in the next hour or day, I would be too tired to fully benefit from my studying.

Lol@failedjustificationforyourabstinence

Cobretti wrote: Lol@failedjustificationforyourabstinence

Find something part time (20hrs/wk) while you study.

@banjo

that is the ideal situation. frankly, it's difficult to find jobs so i've been looking at part time intern opportunities.

.

trying to get full-time employment with only a B.A is horrendous.

And if you do end up getting one, it will probably be some shit job.

Get a job. You can study a few hours a day for 5 months and me more than adequately prepared.
Try this.... take a practice test right now, see how you score, unless you are abysmally terrible on it you don't need all day to study. A 40 hour a week job should not in any way prevent you from the level of study most people need to hit the 170s.
Edit- also you are going to seriously appreciate being able to have more than a year's worth of extra salary in the bank that you don't have to take out loans for that amount.

Honest answer: depends on how naturally you take to the LSAT.

I know people who have taken 6 months off to study for the LSAT full time and couldn't break a 160.

I know people who did the same and topped off at 165.

I know a few who studied for a month and scored 170+

Don't be swayed by people that say "5 months = 179" That's the case for only a tiny handful of people. It may or may not be your case either.

born4law wrote:
Don't be swayed by people that say "5 months = 179" That's the case for only a tiny handful of people.

Which is why I advocate 7 months at least

born4law wrote:Honest answer: depends on how naturally you take to the LSAT.

I know people who have taken 6 months off to study for the LSAT full time and couldn't break a 160.

I know people who did the same and topped off at 165.

I know a few who studied for a month and scored 170+

Don't be swayed by people that say "5 months = 179" That's the case for only a tiny handful of people. It may or may not be your case either.

I'm not saying that much time equals a 179. I'm not even saying it is ideal. However 5 months gives you plenty of time to go through numerous books and do 25+ pts with heavy drilling. Some people may need more and many may need less, but people grossly overestimate the commitment necessary to do well. You don't need to kill your social and work life. Find some balance.

Dr. Dre wrote:

born4law wrote:
Don't be swayed by people that say "5 months = 179" That's the case for only a tiny handful of people.

Which is why I advocate 7 months at least

Huh? A minimum of seven months is a very extreme position. I always thought I was on the extreme side when I advocated for 3-5 months or longer, but I guess you have me beat.

Why on earth do you think 7 months should be a minimum? Do you think people should answer every LSAT question written 3-4 times before being ready to take the actual test?

NoodleyOne wrote:I'm not saying that much time equals a 179. I'm not even saying it is ideal. However 5 months gives you plenty of time to go through numerous books and do 25+ pts with heavy drilling. Some people may need more and many may need less, but people grossly overestimate the commitment necessary to do well. You don't need to kill your social and work life. Find some balance.

+Infinity

I've found two things in my years of working in this business. First, after 6 months, you're going to run into severely diminishing returns, assuming you've been prepping correctly. Second, most people end up having to study for longer than they would otherwise because they drop everything else to study for the LSAT instead of finding balance. The students that still maintain a social life are the ones who see the quickest improvement because they're not miserable and depressed. Both of those things will negatively affect your studying much more than any natural limits to your intelligence.