Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=205315
It will be terrible for us. Law schools are going to see their applicants and just close outright.sid.bahl wrote:Hey guys. I've been reading quite a bit about the fact that law school applications are at an all-time low. How do you think this will affect law school admissions decisions? In our favor? Or against us?
longlivetheking wrote:lol this poster will end well.
The 3.9's and 175 LSAT types that would rather not gamble on the roulette wheel who will instead get an MBA or do something else more lucrative. But for people like me, who have always wanted to be a lawyer, I unfornuately have to gamble. At least my gamble will be at a elite LS if I so choose to pursue this route.laxbrah420 wrote:The interesting question is who is not applying anymore.
Sourcebizzybone1313 wrote:The 3.9's and 175 LSAT types that would rather not gamble on the roulette wheel who will instead get an MBA or do something else more lucrative. But for people like me, who have always wanted to be a lawyer, I unfornuately have to gamble. At least my gamble will be at a elite LS if I so choose to pursue this route.laxbrah420 wrote:The interesting question is who is not applying anymore.
That information has been posted on TLS as well as on LSAC's website numerous times. A lot of people with very high LSAT scores are choosing to not attend law school even though they have the least amount of risk due to their numbers. And the people with very bad numbers are continuing to apply to law school.laxbrah420 wrote:Sourcebizzybone1313 wrote:The 3.9's and 175 LSAT types that would rather not gamble on the roulette wheel who will instead get an MBA or do something else more lucrative. But for people like me, who have always wanted to be a lawyer, I unfornuately have to gamble. At least my gamble will be at a elite LS if I so choose to pursue this route.laxbrah420 wrote:The interesting question is who is not applying anymore.
laxbrah420 wrote:"Source: da Internet. Find it yourself bitch"
That non douchey behavior is encouraged in table 42 of the bluebook.
Some of these people are the types that study for 50 hours and show up on test day and pull 170's.sid.bahl wrote:Why would they take the LSAT then?!?! Seems like an utter waste of time to me...
Seriously if you're going to take the time to help don't be such a dick about it, some people don't get how these forums work entirely.TheThriller wrote:Here is a breakdown of the answer you are looking for since the ability to use the search function seems to escape you.
You're MBA and WE will have more effect on your cycle then declining apps. However, the effect is negligible:
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 8#p6491718
The fact that you are Indian/Asian will have no effect on your cycle. You are not a URM bro.
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 4#p6498464
And don't appeal a rejection. Suck it up and get over yourself. People get rejected from law school everyday.
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 5#p6498465
I would run through and list all the threads that popped up on a simple search of "declining applications" but I'm not that altruistic.
Some users think it's their duty to limit what they consider redundant threads even though it isn't their business.sid.bahl wrote:The Thiller - Thanks for your help although I didn't request it. Much appreciated and sorry to take up so much of your time. I'm still not sure what this "search" function means. Perhaps I'll learn how to use it in law school.
Yeah, research ability using search is a good skill for a lawyer to have.sid.bahl wrote:The Thiller - Thanks for your help although I didn't request it. Much appreciated and sorry to take up so much of your time. I'm still not sure what this "search" function means. Perhaps I'll learn how to use it in law school.
It'd be sweeter though if instead of WLing I could ask a forum for free and that forum wasn't comprised of cockbags.thelawyler wrote:Yeah, research skills is a good skill for a lawyer to have.sid.bahl wrote:The Thiller - Thanks for your help although I didn't request it. Much appreciated and sorry to take up so much of your time. I'm still not sure what this "search" function means. Perhaps I'll learn how to use it in law school.
laxbrah420 wrote:Some users think it's their duty to limit what they consider redundant threads even though it isn't their business.sid.bahl wrote:The Thiller - Thanks for your help although I didn't request it. Much appreciated and sorry to take up so much of your time. I'm still not sure what this "search" function means. Perhaps I'll learn how to use it in law school.