Top Law Schools

ITT we post links to LSN profiles that keep us awake at night. I'm talking really bad. Like WTF.

Note: if i says in the comments there was a serious C&F issue or something like that then take that in to account.

175-180

3.97 http://lawschoolnumbers.com/carterth
3.79 http://lawschoolnumbers.com/BaiAilian2013
3.6 http://lawschoolnumbers.com/cg23/jd
3.5 http://lawschoolnumbers.com/JammasterJ/jd Ended okay, but no acceptances till May.
3.4 http://lawschoolnumbers.com/juju96

Link em and I'll add them to the OP.

You know people can lie on the internet dood

Great idea OP. Too bad those douche bags never explained why they had a bad cycle. There has to be a reason. C&F issues? I think most profiles are real. Some people just are real unlucky. I bet some lower ranked schools thought they would never attend, so they YP'ed them.

bizzybone1313 wrote:Great idea OP. Too bad those douche bags never explained why they had a bad cycle. There has to be a reason. C&F issues? I think most profiles are real. Some people just are real unlucky. I bet some lower ranked schools thought they would never attend, so they YP'ed them.

.....maybe they didn't want to think about it anymore because they felt they under performed. Shadenfreude much, brah?

dr123 wrote:You know people can lie on the internet dood

Well we should definitely just not have the internet then.

wert3813 wrote:

dr123 wrote:You know people can lie on the internet dood

Well we should definitely just not have the internet then.

, , , . But Al Gore could never ever take credit for having "invented" it in the first place.

In all seriousness the fact that you can make a fake LSN shouldn't matter here.

wert3813 wrote:ITT we post links to LSN profiles that keep us awake at night. I'm talking really bad. Like WTF.

Note: if is says in the comments there was a serious C&F issue or something like that then take that in to account.

175-180

3.97 http://lawschoolnumbers.com/carterth
3.79 http://lawschoolnumbers.com/BaiAilian2013
3.6 http://lawschoolnumbers.com/cg23/jd

Link em and I'll add them to the OP.

Bolded got Columbia with 25K/yr with a 175/3.6. How is that really bad? Isn't that as about as good as that dude can do with that GPA? I had a 174/3.56 (multiple takes) and got shut out of CCN.

bizzybone1313 wrote:Great idea OP. Too bad those douche bags never explained why they had a bad cycle. There has to be a reason. C&F issues? I think most profiles are real. Some people just are real unlucky. I bet some lower ranked schools thought they would never attend, so they YP'ed them.

LOL okay

This one is bad, but maybe not terrible (170/4.0):
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/Anihawk/jd

This one certainly could have been better (176/3.85):
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/izy223/jd

Here's a 171/3.98 URM who got WL at HLS, CLS, and NYU:
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/Allyn/jd

Suralin wrote:

bizzybone1313 wrote:Great idea OP. Too bad those douche bags never explained why they had a bad cycle. There has to be a reason. C&F issues? I think most profiles are real. Some people just are real unlucky. I bet some lower ranked schools thought they would never attend, so they YP'ed them.

LOL okay

Knowing this information would be tremendously helpful for future applicants. I bet a lot of these guys just "mailed it in" with their personal statements and overall applications. They thought to themselves: I have great numbers; therefore, I do not have to try at all with my apps.

180 3.97 seemed to have the worst luck so far. Would've thought U. Chicago and Berkeley would have tried snagging that person. Do you guys think the super high LSAT and GPA hurt this applicant for schools below HYS, for YP?

bizzybone1313 wrote:

Suralin wrote:

bizzybone1313 wrote:Great idea OP. Too bad those douche bags never explained why they had a bad cycle. There has to be a reason. C&F issues? I think most profiles are real. Some people just are real unlucky. I bet some lower ranked schools thought they would never attend, so they YP'ed them.

LOL okay

Knowing this information would be tremendously helpful for future applicants. I bet a lot of these guys just "mailed it in" with their personal statements and overall applications. They thought to themselves: I have great numbers; therefore, I do not have to try at all with my apps.

So, based on this assumption (which you pulled directly from your ass), you call these people who had admittedly rough cycles given their numbers, douchebags. Yeah, good for you, champ.

Richie Tenenbaum wrote:

wert3813 wrote:ITT we post links to LSN profiles that keep us awake at night. I'm talking really bad. Like WTF.

Note: if is says in the comments there was a serious C&F issue or something like that then take that in to account.

175-180

3.97 http://lawschoolnumbers.com/carterth
3.79 http://lawschoolnumbers.com/BaiAilian2013
3.6 http://lawschoolnumbers.com/cg23/jd

Link em and I'll add them to the OP.

Bolded got Columbia with 25K/yr with a 175/3.6. How is that really bad? Isn't that as about as good as that dude can do with that GPA? I had a 174/3.56 (multiple takes) and got shut out of CCN.

Yeah I went back and forth on whether to include it because of that offer. In the end I decided to because 1 T14 with those numbers is absurd.

Jpreece59 wrote:This one is bad, but maybe not terrible (170/4.0):
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/Anihawk/jd

This one certainly could have been better (176/3.85):
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/izy223/jd

Here's a 171/3.98 URM who got WL at HLS, CLS, and NYU:
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/Allyn/jd

It's like Berkeley enjoys being unpredictable and random. That URM has such a nice GPA and LSAT combo.

BerkeleyBear wrote:180 3.97 seemed to have the worst luck so far. Would've thought U. Chicago and Berkeley would have tried snagging that person. Do you guys think the super high LSAT and GPA hurt this applicant for schools below HYS, for YP?

I think YP is somewhat overstated on this website. To be clear I think it absolutely exists and happens somewhat often, but TLS makes it seem as though ever candidate who gets WL or ding where they are at or above both medians is a YP. Not so. The process is hugely numbers driven, but adcoms do turn down people for things other than numbers.

Hold up a minute, I thought Puerto Rican didn't get a URM boost.

bjsesq wrote:

bizzybone1313 wrote:

Suralin wrote:

bizzybone1313 wrote:Great idea OP. Too bad those douche bags never explained why they had a bad cycle. There has to be a reason. C&F issues? I think most profiles are real. Some people just are real unlucky. I bet some lower ranked schools thought they would never attend, so they YP'ed them.

LOL okay

Knowing this information would be tremendously helpful for future applicants. I bet a lot of these guys just "mailed it in" with their personal statements and overall applications. They thought to themselves: I have great numbers; therefore, I do not have to try at all with my apps.

So, based on this assumption (which you pulled directly from your ass), you call these people who had admittedly rough cycles given their numbers, douchebags. Yeah, good for you, champ.

All I am saying is that these people benefitted tremendously from the information gathered on LSN, and they could have returned the favor. I am not happy at their misfortunes. I feel real bad for them actually. They worked very hard for those numbers and didn't get what would normally be considered reasonable.

bizzybone1313 wrote:All I am saying is that these people benefitted tremendously from the information gathered on LSN, and they could have returned the favor. I am not happy at their misfortunes. I feel real bad for them actually. They worked very hard for those numbers and didn't get what would normally be considered reasonable.

Bai was a poster here and helped a lot of people out. She wasn't a douche. Search her info before you start making broad proclamations about what sort of person she is.

Jpreece59 wrote:This one is bad, but maybe not terrible (170/4.0):
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/Anihawk/jd

Leaving this one off because they didn't update to completion and it was during a fairly competitive cycle.

Jpreece59 wrote:This one certainly could have been better (176/3.85):
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/izy223/jd

Not quite bad enough.

Jpreece59 wrote:Here's a 171/3.98 URM who got WL at HLS, CLS, and NYU:
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/Allyn/jd

Almost positive white PR doesn't get a boost...

BerkeleyBear wrote: It's like Berkeley enjoys being unpredictable and random. That URM has such a nice GPA and LSAT combo.

Topic for another thread but I think Berkeley doesn't get enough credit for being holistic. The most holistic school out there (yes, more that Y or S IMO).

bjsesq wrote:

bizzybone1313 wrote:All I am saying is that these people benefitted tremendously from the information gathered on LSN, and they could have returned the favor. I am not happy at their misfortunes. I feel real bad for them actually. They worked very hard for those numbers and didn't get what would normally be considered reasonable.

Bai was a poster here and helped a lot of people out. She wasn't a douche. Search her info before you start making broad proclamations about what sort of person she is.

Could we may chalk this up as someone said something stupid on the internet and move on before the thread gets hijacked?

There is a guy on TLS who has like a 3.9 and three LSAT scores (155ish, 165ish and a 176ish). This guy came to TLS to ask for advice as to his chances at YHS. It would be nice for him to come back and tell everyone what happened with his cycle. It might very well be true that most of the T-14 doesn't care about retakes, but this might not necessarily be the case with YHS. If someone has used TLS and LSN to benefit themselves, wouldn't it be nice for them to return the favor for future applicants?

wert3813 wrote:

bjsesq wrote:

bizzybone1313 wrote:All I am saying is that these people benefitted tremendously from the information gathered on LSN, and they could have returned the favor. I am not happy at their misfortunes. I feel real bad for them actually. They worked very hard for those numbers and didn't get what would normally be considered reasonable.

Bai was a poster here and helped a lot of people out. She wasn't a douche. Search her info before you start making broad proclamations about what sort of person she is.

Could we may chalk this up as someone said something stupid on the internet and move on before the thread gets hijacked?

Not really sure what the point of the thread is, other than torturing yourself, but fine. I'll let it go.

bizzybone1313 wrote:There is a guy on TLS who has like a 3.9 and three LSAT scores (155ish, 165ish and a 176ish). This guy came to TLS to ask for advice as to his chances at YHS. It would be nice for him to come back and tell everyone what happened with his cycle. It might very well be true that most of the T-14 doesn't care about retakes, but this might not necessarily be the case with YHS. If someone has used TLS and LSN to benefit themselves, wouldn't it be nice for them to return the favor for future applicants?

Yes it would. Moving on...Please?

bjsesq wrote:

wert3813 wrote:

bjsesq wrote:

bizzybone1313 wrote:All I am saying is that these people benefitted tremendously from the information gathered on LSN, and they could have returned the favor. I am not happy at their misfortunes. I feel real bad for them actually. They worked very hard for those numbers and didn't get what would normally be considered reasonable.

Bai was a poster here and helped a lot of people out. She wasn't a douche. Search her info before you start making broad proclamations about what sort of person she is.

Could we may chalk this up as someone said something stupid on the internet and move on before the thread gets hijacked?

Not really sure what the point of the thread is, other than torturing yourself, but fine. I'll let it go.

On a website where people make posts about the C&F issues of getting fired from work for masturbating in a broom closet I feel like this is a fairly useful thread.

I for one would like to get an idea of what the floor is for various numbers.