Sexual Misconduct Addendum Forum
- contrapositive1
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 10:06 am
Re: Sexual Misconduct Addendum
Stop
Last edited by contrapositive1 on Sat Jan 26, 2013 7:07 pm, edited 3 times in total.
- rinkrat19
- Posts: 13922
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 5:35 am
Re: Sexual Misconduct Addendum
Someone needs the "no means no" talk.contrapositive1 wrote:The judicial affairs said it was genuine miscommunication, and although I did not intend to cause harm, they felt I still broke their policy.bbsg wrote:I'm pretty sure this is probably impossible without straight up having committed rape?cinephile wrote:How does one assume there was consent when there wasn't?
Or possibly the "unconscious means no" talk.
- contrapositive1
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 10:06 am
Re: Sexual Misconduct Addendum
can u please leave
Last edited by contrapositive1 on Sat Jan 26, 2013 7:07 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- John_rizzy_rawls
- Posts: 3468
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 2:44 pm
Re: Sexual Misconduct Addendum
This doesn't make any sense. Was there alcohol? Did she not indicate she did not want what you were doing? Was she passed out?contrapositive1 wrote:The judicial affairs said it was genuine miscommunication, and although I did not intend to cause harm, they felt I still broke their policy.bbsg wrote:I'm pretty sure this is probably impossible without straight up having committed rape?cinephile wrote:How does one assume there was consent when there wasn't?
I'm not a rapist. Seriously, it was huge miscommunication, although not apparent to me.
Let me make this clearer:
You: "Hey baby let's do this." + Her: Anything at all other than "yes/sure/okay," including not returning your advance and being passed out = rape.
If this is what happened, you're a) lucky you weren't convicted b) not going to be a lawyer.
If this is not what happened, you're going to have to be crystal clear on any application about the circumstances if you have any chance of going to law school, let alone passing the bar or (lol) working for the D.A.
Last edited by John_rizzy_rawls on Sat Jan 26, 2013 3:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
- ilovesf
- Posts: 12837
- Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 5:20 pm
Re: Sexual Misconduct Addendum
I feel like for your own benefit, I should tell you to probably stop telling people specifics of the situation, and stop responding to people who want more details. In general, you probably shouldn't be talking about something like this in detail on a law school website.contrapositive1 wrote: The person never said "no" and the person was never unconscious. If they were I would have been expelled or easily suspended from school.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 271
- Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2012 3:07 am
Re: Sexual Misconduct Addendum
+1 -- I don't want to jump down your throat, OP, but just as heads up to you: if you can't clear this up to adccoms and the bar association when the time comes then you're going to get shut out.John_rizzy_rawls wrote:This doesn't make any sense. Was there alcohol? Did she not indicate she did not want what you were doing? Was she passed out?contrapositive1 wrote:The judicial affairs said it was genuine miscommunication, and although I did not intend to cause harm, they felt I still broke their policy.bbsg wrote:I'm pretty sure this is probably impossible without straight up having committed rape?cinephile wrote:How does one assume there was consent when there wasn't?
I'm not a rapist. Seriously, it was huge miscommunication, although not apparent to me.
Let me make this clearer:
You: "Hey baby let's do this." + Her: Anything at all other than "yes/sure/okay," including not returning your advance and being passed out = rape.
If this is what happened, you're a) lucky you weren't convicted b) not going to be a lawyer.
If this is not what happened, you're going to have to be crystal clear about the circumstances if you have any chance going to law school, let alone passing the bar or (lol) working for the D.A.
That said, don't disclose anything further here. Just be aware of what I said above. At the end of the day, this is a matter you're going to need to fully disclose to the proper people, and the more that you say in various public fora the more of a headache you might possibly be weaving for later. Random people on TLS aren't the "proper people" by any stretch.
- ManOfTheMinute
- Posts: 1557
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:54 am
Re: Sexual Misconduct Addendum
Rather, you should probably not be a lawyer.ilovesf wrote:I feel like for your own benefit, I should tell you to probably stop telling people specifics of the situation, and stop responding to people who want more details. In general, you probably shouldn't be talking about something like this in detail on a law school website.contrapositive1 wrote: The person never said "no" and the person was never unconscious. If they were I would have been expelled or easily suspended from school.
- contrapositive1
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 10:06 am
Re: Sexual Misconduct Addendum
The real courts are diff
Last edited by contrapositive1 on Sat Jan 26, 2013 6:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- John_rizzy_rawls
- Posts: 3468
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 2:44 pm
Re: Sexual Misconduct Addendum
So then there is a preponderance of evidence that you raped someone?contrapositive1 wrote:Just so you know, my school basis guilt on "preponderance of evidence."
The real courts basis guilt on "clear and convincing evidence."
This does not help you at all.
Especially considering the law schools admissions process, the bar passage process, and the employment hiring process all have significantly lower burdens of reasoning for denial than your university does of placing sanctions on you.
- contrapositive1
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 10:06 am
Re: Sexual Misconduct Addendum
leave please
Last edited by contrapositive1 on Sat Jan 26, 2013 7:07 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- John_rizzy_rawls
- Posts: 3468
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 2:44 pm
Re: Sexual Misconduct Addendum
I understand what preponderance means.contrapositive1 wrote:"preponderance" means 50% or more. My school has its own definition of non-consensual sex than the legal definition.John_rizzy_rawls wrote:So then there is a preponderance of evidence that you raped someone?contrapositive1 wrote:Just so you know, my school basis guilt on "preponderance of evidence."
The real courts basis guilt on "clear and convincing evidence."
This does not help you at all.
Especially considering the law schools admissions process, the bar passage process, and the employment hiring process all have significantly lower burdens of reasoning for denial than your university does of placing sanctions on you.
What I'm telling you is that your university's standard for sanctioning you (preponderance of evidence) = MUCH MORE HARSH than the standard for universities, your state's bar, and employers to simply not admit you.
The former involves having to prove, to whatever degree, that a significant enough harm was propagated in order to dole out punishment. There is some burden of proof.
Your admission to a school, bar, or job is based purely on the preference of a committee. They owe you nothing and are threatening no punishment, and thus their ability to simply say no requires no burden of proof at all really.
This part isn't really up for debate, that's just how it works.
Best thing for you to do is get your story clear, disclose, speak to a C&F attorney to see if you can pass the bar, and go from there. Getting into law school may be even more difficult than passing the bar.
- contrapositive1
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 10:06 am
Re: Sexual Misconduct Addendum
people need to calm down
Last edited by contrapositive1 on Sat Jan 26, 2013 6:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- John_rizzy_rawls
- Posts: 3468
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 2:44 pm
Re: Sexual Misconduct Addendum
In every day life from a functional standpoint? Yes it is better not to have a criminal record.contrapositive1 wrote:Obviously i have not said much details about it here... i just simply don't think it's safe 2 do so
The fact that I was never arrested, charged, or convicted have any relevance?
Perceptually, or before an admissions committee or potential employer? No, I really do not think so simply because of what the act is.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- whosonfirst
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 11:48 am
Re: Sexual Misconduct Addendum
Law schools generally avoid students they think will pose a safety risk to other students. I only say generally because I am just now hearing about Tulane accepting a convicted murder - before reading that I would have said law schools always avoid such students. The reasons for doing so are obvious: if risk comes to fruition, law school could be charged with liability as this risk was made clear to them through application process (C&F, addendum, etc.). No law school will risk paying millions in damages.
Honestly, even if the risk never came to fruition, I would be VERY UPSET at my law school if they allowed someone with such a C&F issue to attend alongside me and probably wouldn't go there.
Honestly, even if the risk never came to fruition, I would be VERY UPSET at my law school if they allowed someone with such a C&F issue to attend alongside me and probably wouldn't go there.
-
- Posts: 456
- Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 11:08 pm
Re: Sexual Misconduct Addendum
copy and paste whatever you violated so we can see the minimum threshold for what you've done.
- RhymesLikeDimes
- Posts: 403
- Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2013 12:58 pm
Re: Sexual Misconduct Addendum
You had better hope no adcomms have daughters at the schools you apply to.
-
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2012 7:12 pm
Re: Sexual Misconduct Addendum
What's clear here is that you raped someone. You had sex with someone who did not consent. That's rape and you are a rapist. The fact that you weren't charged isn't even surprising much less evidence of your innocence.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- stillwater
- Posts: 3804
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 2:59 pm
Re: Sexual Misconduct Addendum
this thread is sordid. in light of all of this, OP I think you need to find a new career path.
- Dmini7
- Posts: 724
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 2:20 pm
Re: Sexual Misconduct Addendum
no means no, and in other cases yes means no. OP should've filled out the sex contract.
In all seriousness, it will look really really bad to schools. If you can pull some sort of ABA accredited school, it will not be a T-14 even if your numbers are amazing, I can't imagine them willing to take the chance with something like that. They do not want to be in the same pool as Tulane. Will you get a tier 1? Possibly, Tulane had a murderer, but with that said, I think our society views rape as a more disgusting crime in some situations (especially those with little to no information provided). Basically, everyone here, and probably adcomms will see you as a disgrace to humans. I sure hope you can explain to them much better than you have to us. I also hope you could get the person who deemed you committed such act to write the reasonings for the punishment (i.e: explain the evidence) if you are convinced it was solely a miscommunication
In all seriousness, it will look really really bad to schools. If you can pull some sort of ABA accredited school, it will not be a T-14 even if your numbers are amazing, I can't imagine them willing to take the chance with something like that. They do not want to be in the same pool as Tulane. Will you get a tier 1? Possibly, Tulane had a murderer, but with that said, I think our society views rape as a more disgusting crime in some situations (especially those with little to no information provided). Basically, everyone here, and probably adcomms will see you as a disgrace to humans. I sure hope you can explain to them much better than you have to us. I also hope you could get the person who deemed you committed such act to write the reasonings for the punishment (i.e: explain the evidence) if you are convinced it was solely a miscommunication
- DavidHasselhoff
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2012 5:36 pm
Re: Sexual Misconduct Addendum
So let me get this straight.
1) You and your boyfriend were role playing when he went down on you and you poked him from behind. He complained and told you he didn't want you to go that far and then told someone.
2) You got questioned and the cops got sickened by the idea, but didn't want to charge you.
3) You got sanctioned by the school, and now you realize your mistakes and want to change your career path aspirations.
4) The DA has an opening for an intern and you would eventually like to go to law school.
In my pure opinion, it may be good to apply to the DA's office and get some experience so that you can add it to your resume.
1) You and your boyfriend were role playing when he went down on you and you poked him from behind. He complained and told you he didn't want you to go that far and then told someone.
2) You got questioned and the cops got sickened by the idea, but didn't want to charge you.
3) You got sanctioned by the school, and now you realize your mistakes and want to change your career path aspirations.
4) The DA has an opening for an intern and you would eventually like to go to law school.
In my pure opinion, it may be good to apply to the DA's office and get some experience so that you can add it to your resume.
-
- Posts: 216
- Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2011 12:57 pm
Re: Sexual Misconduct Addendum
A lot of places say that there can be no consent if there is alcohol involved. I don't know what the OP's situation is but it's actually possible that a girl has a beer and is begging to get banged but since she was under the influence didn't actually give consent.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2012 7:12 pm
Re: Sexual Misconduct Addendum
Seems we have another misogynist winner.PBateman1 wrote:A lot of places say that there can be no consent if there is alcohol involved. I don't know what the OP's situation is but it's actually possible that a girl has a beer and is begging to get banged but since she was under the influence didn't actually give consent.
How many drunk girls have you slept with? I've been with quite a few and I can tell you that not once did I wake up with a girl and have her call the police and accuse me of rape. Having sex with someone too drunk to consent is rape. Getting a girl super drunk so you can have sex is rape.
Believe it or not, girls don't have a few beers agree to have sex and then call the cops as a habit. Can you imagine the ordeal? For what?
- oaken
- Posts: 339
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 11:27 am
Re: Sexual Misconduct Addendum
EDIT: I can't tell if I'm being trolled and I have no idea what is happening
Last edited by oaken on Sat Jan 26, 2013 3:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 216
- Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2011 12:57 pm
Re: Sexual Misconduct Addendum
Wow you made a lot of assumptions based on my post. I wasn't trying to exonerate the OP. I just introduced the fact that the introduction of alcohol into a sexual situation makes the female unable to consent in many situations. So basically in one of your drunken hookups had the girl really regretted it you potentially could have been in a similar situation as the OP. But since I see that reasonable discourse isn't going to occur in this thread I'm out.rvadog wrote:Seems we have another misogynist winner.PBateman1 wrote:A lot of places say that there can be no consent if there is alcohol involved. I don't know what the OP's situation is but it's actually possible that a girl has a beer and is begging to get banged but since she was under the influence didn't actually give consent.
How many drunk girls have you slept with? I've been with quite a few and I can tell you that not once did I wake up with a girl and have her call the police and accuse me of rape. Having sex with someone too drunk to consent is rape. Getting a girl super drunk so you can have sex is rape.
Believe it or not, girls don't have a few beers agree to have sex and then call the cops as a habit. Can you imagine the ordeal? For what?
-
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2012 7:12 pm
Re: Sexual Misconduct Addendum
No you are an idiot.
Anyone who believes that this guy went to a party, had some beers, met a girl who was "begging to be banged" and suddenly, BAM, accused of rape is an idiot.
He (if that's the case) knew she was too drunk to consent and took advantage of her (rape).
Stop trying to insinuate that it isn't rape or it's a lesser form of rape.
Anyone who believes that this guy went to a party, had some beers, met a girl who was "begging to be banged" and suddenly, BAM, accused of rape is an idiot.
He (if that's the case) knew she was too drunk to consent and took advantage of her (rape).
Stop trying to insinuate that it isn't rape or it's a lesser form of rape.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login