Reverse splitters unite!! Forum
- simplycatalina
- Posts: 935
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 7:41 pm
Reverse splitters unite!!
Any 164< and 3.7> had luck with your cycle so far??
- TripTrip
- Posts: 2767
- Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 9:52 am
Re: Reverse splitters unite!!
+1Wormfather wrote:Reverse splitters retake
168 ----> 175
- teachmehowtoraji
- Posts: 198
- Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 6:25 pm
Re: Reverse splitters unite!!
Check out my profile for my cycle, I'm a 164/3.77 and have been doing alright for myself so far.
- simplycatalina
- Posts: 935
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 7:41 pm
Re: Reverse splitters unite!!
Congrats on the acceptances!! I'm applying to a lot of the same schools as you, hope it goes just as well.teachmehowtoraji wrote:Check out my profile for my cycle, I'm a 164/3.77 and have been doing alright for myself so far.
- TripTrip
- Posts: 2767
- Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 9:52 am
Re: Reverse splitters unite!!
Alright? You have Cornell listed as a "long shot." You'd be an auto-admit at Cornell with 3-4 more points on your LSAT. You need to retake, too.teachmehowtoraji wrote:Check out my profile for my cycle, I'm a 164/3.77 and have been doing alright for myself so far.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- teachmehowtoraji
- Posts: 198
- Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 6:25 pm
Re: Reverse splitters unite!!
TripTrip wrote:Alright? You have Cornell listed as a "long shot." You'd be an auto-admit at Cornell with 3-4 more points on your LSAT. You need to retake, too.teachmehowtoraji wrote:Check out my profile for my cycle, I'm a 164/3.77 and have been doing alright for myself so far.
FWIW, I'm probably going to take a year off or so and retake/reapply, so I'm well aware. Just thought I'd cast a wide net this cycle since apps are down and see what happens.
- simplycatalina
- Posts: 935
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 7:41 pm
Re: Reverse splitters unite!!
Yeah, I'm doing the same thing.teachmehowtoraji wrote:TripTrip wrote:Alright? You have Cornell listed as a "long shot." You'd be an auto-admit at Cornell with 3-4 more points on your LSAT. You need to retake, too.teachmehowtoraji wrote:Check out my profile for my cycle, I'm a 164/3.77 and have been doing alright for myself so far.
FWIW, I'm probably going to take a year off or so and retake/reapply, so I'm well aware. Just thought I'd cast a wide net this cycle since apps are down and see what happens.
- kay2016
- Posts: 1119
- Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 11:23 am
Re: Reverse splitters unite!!
I'm 164 3.89.
Didn't apply to any huge reaches but I've gotten a few acceptances and at least one awesome scholarship
Didn't apply to any huge reaches but I've gotten a few acceptances and at least one awesome scholarship
- TheThriller
- Posts: 2282
- Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 10:12 pm
Re: Reverse splitters unite!!
You should rename this thread "People who need to retake the LSAT unite"
-
- Posts: 3070
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 12:17 am
Re: Reverse splitters unite!!
.
Last edited by 20141023 on Mon Sep 09, 2013 9:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- teachmehowtoraji
- Posts: 198
- Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 6:25 pm
Re: Reverse splitters unite!!
Regulus wrote:Must write the obligatory Regulus response.... although I am pretty sure my cycle would have been killer with a 170+, it wasn't bad by any means with a 166 / 3.92.
Chicago with a 166 is about as killer as I can imagine, I'd be willing to gues you had some nasty softs though.
Edit: Grammar
-
- Posts: 3070
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 12:17 am
Re: Reverse splitters unite!!
.
Last edited by 20141023 on Mon Sep 09, 2013 9:21 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- teachmehowtoraji
- Posts: 198
- Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 6:25 pm
Re: Reverse splitters unite!!
Regulus wrote:Naw... this is about as killer as I can imagine. (LSN)teachmehowtoraji wrote:Regulus wrote:Must write the obligatory Regulus response.... although I am pretty sure my cycle would have been killer with a 170+, it wasn't bad by any means with a 166 / 3.92.
Chicago with a 166 is about as killer as I can imagine, I'd be willing to gues you had some nasty softs though.
Edit: Grammar
Ahhh yeah I've seen kingsfield's cycle on the Acceptances threads...it's so disheartening seeing someone with the same LSAT as me posting on all the same threads as me withdrawing because he's in HLS. Gonna go kill myself/study LR til my eyes bleed
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- JXander
- Posts: 966
- Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2012 10:23 am
Re: Reverse splitters unite!!
I have been, too. But that does not move RS's away from financial obstacles. No T20 is going to give a 3.9 a serious scholly if their LSAT is a 155.teachmehowtoraji wrote:Check out my profile for my cycle, I'm a 164/3.77 and have been doing alright for myself so far.
- teachmehowtoraji
- Posts: 198
- Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 6:25 pm
Re: Reverse splitters unite!!
JXander wrote:I have been, too. But that does not move RS's away from financial obstacles. No T20 is going to give a 3.9 a serious scholly if their LSAT is a 155.teachmehowtoraji wrote:Check out my profile for my cycle, I'm a 164/3.77 and have been doing alright for myself so far.
Couldn't have said it better myself (all the more reason I'm leaning towards a retake).
- Nova
- Posts: 9102
- Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2012 8:55 pm
Re: Reverse splitters unite!!
That reminds me of this lulzy thread from the summer http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 4&t=187575Regulus wrote:EDIT: I think my biggest saving factor is the fact that I'm an underrepresented minority.... 100% atheist.
- teachmehowtoraji
- Posts: 198
- Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 6:25 pm
Re: Reverse splitters unite!!
Nova wrote:That reminds me of this lulzy thread from the summer http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 4&t=187575Regulus wrote:EDIT: I think my biggest saving factor is the fact that I'm an underrepresented minority.... 100% atheist.
Looks like an absolute shitstorm of a thread (from the first ~20 posts)
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Yukos
- Posts: 1774
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2011 12:47 pm
Re: Reverse splitters unite!!
While we're certainly a minority I doubt we're underrepresented in law school (since I'm pretty sure there's no statistics on atheists in law school I'm just going to take this on faith).Regulus wrote:Naw... this is about as killer as I can imagine. (LSN)teachmehowtoraji wrote:Regulus wrote:Must write the obligatory Regulus response.... although I am pretty sure my cycle would have been killer with a 170+, it wasn't bad by any means with a 166 / 3.92.
Chicago with a 166 is about as killer as I can imagine, I'd be willing to gues you had some nasty softs though.
Edit: Grammar
EDIT: I think my biggest saving factor is the fact that I'm an underrepresented minority.... 100% atheist.
And I have to throw out the standard disclaimer that while some people do very well despite mediocre-for-the-T14 LSATs, they are the exceptions that prove the rule, and they could've done even better with a retake (as Regulus admitted). Even Kingsfield probably could've gotten Y if he had retaken and gotten a 170+, though based on his user name it's possible that H was his no. 1 choice in any case.
-
- Posts: 3070
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 12:17 am
Re: Reverse splitters unite!!
.
Last edited by 20141023 on Mon Sep 09, 2013 9:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login