Employment History vs. Resume Forum
- Ludo!
- Posts: 4730
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 1:22 pm
Re: Employment History vs. Resume
Are you putting every job you've ever had on your resume? Unless you've only had 1 or 2 jobs you're probably doing it wrong
- dingbat
- Posts: 4974
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 9:12 pm
Re: Employment History vs. Resume
It's a test to see if you're willing to do repetitive tasks
- Ludo!
- Posts: 4730
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 1:22 pm
Re: Employment History vs. Resume
You put EVERY single job you've ever had on your resume? That's weird. In your case yeah you are probably going to have to reenter a lot of data. I think that question is designed for most people who only put a few of their most relevant jobs on their resume.
- DougieFresh
- Posts: 59
- Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2012 1:26 pm
Re: Employment History vs. Resume
bump.
As someone who always had one or two part time jobs while at school, and then FT plus other PT jobs after school. Unless a school has a strong pizza law program, I dont think my part time work experience is all that relevant.
As someone who always had one or two part time jobs while at school, and then FT plus other PT jobs after school. Unless a school has a strong pizza law program, I dont think my part time work experience is all that relevant.
- Ludo!
- Posts: 4730
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 1:22 pm
Re: Employment History vs. Resume
It's not relevant, that's why you don't put it on your resume. But you have to list it all for the bar, so some schools want to see it on the applicationDougieFresh wrote:bump.
As someone who always had one or two part time jobs while at school, and then FT plus other PT jobs after school. Unless a school has a strong pizza law program, I dont think my part time work experience is all that relevant.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- gaud
- Posts: 5765
- Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2011 2:58 am
Re: Employment History vs. Resume
maybe they want it for the state bar in the future? i could be pullin this outta my ass, but doesn't the bar look into all the jobs you've had?
SCOOPED. I think Ludovico gots it
SCOOPED. I think Ludovico gots it
- dingbat
- Posts: 4974
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 9:12 pm
Re: Employment History vs. Resume
For this same reason I left off a decade of work experience (off the entire app, not just my resume)DougieFresh wrote:bump.
As someone who always had one or two part time jobs while at school, and then FT plus other PT jobs after school. Unless a school has a strong pizza law program, I dont think my part time work experience is all that relevant.
- BlaqBella
- Posts: 868
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 9:41 am
Re: Employment History vs. Resume
I would call them up and ask if you can input "Please see attached resume" or something along those lines in the application where they ask for a list.
If that's not possible, just bullet point your employment history, allowing your resume to give the details. So for example:
1. Senior Auditor -- ABC Inc. (Sept 2010 - Present)
2. Junior Auditor -- ABC Inc. (May 2008 - Sept 2010)
...would be listed and the details of each job descrip with be in the attached resume...if you get my drift.
If that's not possible, just bullet point your employment history, allowing your resume to give the details. So for example:
1. Senior Auditor -- ABC Inc. (Sept 2010 - Present)
2. Junior Auditor -- ABC Inc. (May 2008 - Sept 2010)
...would be listed and the details of each job descrip with be in the attached resume...if you get my drift.
- BlaqBella
- Posts: 868
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 9:41 am
Re: Employment History vs. Resume
Funny, I was also a barista at Starbucks back in the day and I actually will be listing that experience on my resume, lol. Hey, it's all part of the history and shows my progress from then and now.Wormfather wrote:Shit, I'm a moron, yeah that Starbucks job back in 1998 isnt on my resume, but everything else I did was all professional and relevant.Ludovico Technique wrote:You put EVERY single job you've ever had on your resume? That's weird. In your case yeah you are probably going to have to reenter a lot of data. I think that question is designed for most people who only put a few of their most relevant jobs on their resume.
In this day and age, after ten years of WE its not uncommon to have a couple of pages worth of resume.
- risa
- Posts: 466
- Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 4:03 am
Re: Employment History vs. Resume
I've seen some schools' instructions that specifically state that the want you to fill out the entire employment history section even if it's on your resume too. I wouldn't risk looking lazy by writing "please see attached resume." My resume is only "relevant" work or volunteer experience anyways. I'm almost 9 years out of school so it feels ridiculous listing my work as a lifeguard at the campus pool on my application, but I look at is as the law schools wanting to look at my undergrad grades in light of how many hours per week I was working during the school year.
-
- Posts: 196
- Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 5:48 pm
Re: Employment History vs. Resume
I'm not too concerned with the handful of jobs I left off the app, they were so petty I actually forgot about them.
-
- Posts: 1499
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2012 4:25 pm
Re: Employment History vs. Resume
.
Last edited by nickb285 on Sun Jul 16, 2017 6:08 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- dingbat
- Posts: 4974
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 9:12 pm
Re: Employment History vs. Resume
I don't think it particularly matters. Someone with more knowledge - doesn't the bar ask for 10 years back?nickb285 wrote:So wait, could there be an issue with the bar if we left some crap job off the application? E.g. I worked as a busboy at a shitty restaurant for two weeks my freshman year of UG and forgot about it till just now; will there be a problem because I didn't put that (or some similar stuff--a couple months at Best Buy, two weeks working for a friend/former boss of mine, that kind of thing) on my law school applications?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1499
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2012 4:25 pm
Re: Employment History vs. Resume
.
Last edited by nickb285 on Sun Jul 16, 2017 6:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1499
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2012 4:25 pm
Re: Employment History vs. Resume
.
Last edited by nickb285 on Sun Jul 16, 2017 6:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- dingbat
- Posts: 4974
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 9:12 pm
Re: Employment History vs. Resume
Wormfather wrote:nickb285 wrote:oh god now i'm hallucinating
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 9:24 pm
Re: Employment History vs. Resume
There are many reasons for both an application and a resume: We'll begin with two.
You cannot be held accountable to falsehoods on a self-directed document, however, you can be held to the accuracy of a corporation's application wherein you print and sign your name attesting that your representations in the application are true. Again, this is not available on a self-directed document, aka, a resume).
For example, all day long and any day of the week, you can falsely represent in your resume that you were the Editor in Chief of some law journal in 2001 when you were actually one of three proofreaders.
Your signature on the application gives the recruiting authority permission to do a background check, and thus grounds to terminate you when they learn the truth two minutes, or five years later. (Read the language at the bottom of any application--this will clue you).
Next, the rule of thumb is to only provide 10 years of your professional history on a resume, or go back to high school graduation--whichever comes first. You're 30 years old, so giving 10 years should be no problem. Where you did not hold a job, but was a full time student, simply state so. Remember, a career history includes collegiate activity, volunteer work, and freelancing. You're not limited to a compensable tenure.
In this era where background checks really are necessary, it is not unreasonable for recruiters to ask for specifics--twice. So.....if supplying details two or three or four times is a problem.....then you better re-think becoming an attorney, or going into the legal field at all
Good luck
~Professionally Written LLC~
www.spammyspam
You cannot be held accountable to falsehoods on a self-directed document, however, you can be held to the accuracy of a corporation's application wherein you print and sign your name attesting that your representations in the application are true. Again, this is not available on a self-directed document, aka, a resume).
For example, all day long and any day of the week, you can falsely represent in your resume that you were the Editor in Chief of some law journal in 2001 when you were actually one of three proofreaders.
Your signature on the application gives the recruiting authority permission to do a background check, and thus grounds to terminate you when they learn the truth two minutes, or five years later. (Read the language at the bottom of any application--this will clue you).
Next, the rule of thumb is to only provide 10 years of your professional history on a resume, or go back to high school graduation--whichever comes first. You're 30 years old, so giving 10 years should be no problem. Where you did not hold a job, but was a full time student, simply state so. Remember, a career history includes collegiate activity, volunteer work, and freelancing. You're not limited to a compensable tenure.
In this era where background checks really are necessary, it is not unreasonable for recruiters to ask for specifics--twice. So.....if supplying details two or three or four times is a problem.....then you better re-think becoming an attorney, or going into the legal field at all
Good luck
~Professionally Written LLC~
www.spammyspam
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- crossingfingers
- Posts: 171
- Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2012 9:20 pm
Re: Employment History vs. Resume
Great timing on this thread, I was just about to post regarding this issue.
I don't think anyone's concerned about the time it will actually take to enter, it's more an issue of not having things look inconsistent or too exclusive/inclusive on the resume.
I've been on 14 different payrolls since my undergrad started in 2000, naturally I haven't listed all those on my resume (which TLS implored me to keep to one page), but certain apps simply request you to "list employment". This makes it seem like they want every job you've ever held. My concern is that if I list everything, some schools that weren't collecting this for bar reasons will look down on listing 14 jobs.
I guess I'll err on the side of inclusiveness, but I'm not going to add more than my last/most relevant 4-5 positions on my resume. If anyone else has further clarification to add, thanks in advance.
I don't think anyone's concerned about the time it will actually take to enter, it's more an issue of not having things look inconsistent or too exclusive/inclusive on the resume.
I've been on 14 different payrolls since my undergrad started in 2000, naturally I haven't listed all those on my resume (which TLS implored me to keep to one page), but certain apps simply request you to "list employment". This makes it seem like they want every job you've ever held. My concern is that if I list everything, some schools that weren't collecting this for bar reasons will look down on listing 14 jobs.
I guess I'll err on the side of inclusiveness, but I'm not going to add more than my last/most relevant 4-5 positions on my resume. If anyone else has further clarification to add, thanks in advance.
- lever1je
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2012 2:35 pm
Re: Employment History vs. Resume
Is there any consensus on the importance in getting dates correct? With some of the jobs I've had I can only remember time periods but not exact months on starting and ending
- dingbat
- Posts: 4974
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 9:12 pm
Re: Employment History vs. Resume
Not important if not lying (getting a month wrong is not a big deal, but doubling the length of the job is)lever1je wrote:Is there any consensus on the importance in getting dates correct? With some of the jobs I've had I can only remember time periods but not exact months on starting and ending
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login