Top Law Schools

So, I've completed almost every set of logic game conceivable and i've noticed that for the logic games in the 2000's I received on average less than 4 wrong. However, when i was working through the 90's logic games I found them much more time consuming (not necessarily difficult) but i found it quite hard to complete all the sets on time and ended up missing more than 4.

I was reading a few forums and saw that some people had said/felt the same exact way about the 90's logic games.

Does anyone know if the 90's logic games were designed to be more time consuming and difficult?

For example one website mentioned this:

"In the 90’s the games sections were super hard, while the logical reasoning and reading comprehension were pretty easy. Today the games are pretty easy, and the logical reasoning is bit harder and the reading comprehension is much harder. So, to be ready for what the real test is like, save the more recent tests for your full practice tests. Use the older tests to practice each section individually."

Theyre all about the same IMO. Even the computer game from test one....

The games are more predictable. Many of the odd game types haven't appeared since the 1990's.

^Agree. Only noticeable difference, for me, is the lack of "weird" games--mapping (ski chalets), circular linearity, stuff like that. Other than that, they're pretty much the same (to use Nova's example, the computer game from PT1). Another good example is the doctor Amata game.

.

wert3813 wrote:I didn't get a single question on planes/pilots/co-pilots flying in an airshow. I didn't understand if the pilots/co-pilots could fly twice or not.

That's a mapping one, right? PS LG Bible has a good guide--treat it like a linear/grouping. You can do the same thing for the town planning game.