LSAC3.65LSAT 168-171BUT!13 Fs from 10years ago C&F CRISIS
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 1:13 am
Top Law Schools
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
LSAC3.65LSAT 168-171BUT!13 Fs from 10years ago C&F CRISIS Forum
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=181321
Page 1 of 1
Re: LSAC3.65LSAT 168-171BUT!13 Fs from 10years ago C&F CRISIS
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 1:24 am
You have to disclose.shoulinpandas wrote:LSAC 3.65 LSAT PTS 168-171 BUT!!!! 13 Semesters Credits Straight Fs from 10 years ago in HS dropin GPA to 3.2 WTF do I do C&F CRISIS?!!!!!!!!!!! HELP.... i see t14 death and the t20 fading from my reality....
Disclose?
Amend LS APP once admitted? Possible?
Nondisclosure and C&F denied?
WTF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Advice please
If you don't, there is no way you could get through C&F.
Best course of action is to submit all the required grades, (make sure LSAC even includes those high school grades in the first place, which means ask LSAC or find out from official LSAC material, which is different than asking a friend/stranger on the internet/assuming yourself. If the grades do not appear on your college transcript then chances are they do not count but once again check with LSAC and to be on the side of caution assume they count and DISCLOSE THAT INFORMATION), then submit an addendum to application stating why you have straight F's for 13 semester credits.
Third, take your lsat.
And in case I did not make myself clear in the beginning DISCLOSE, OTHERWISE IT IS LYING/DECEITFUL
Re: LSAC3.65LSAT 168-171BUT!13 Fs from 10years ago C&F CRISIS
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 1:32 am
Re: LSAC3.65LSAT 168-171BUT!13 Fs from 10years ago C&F CRISIS
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 1:37 am
Please, for the love of God, work on your writing skills too. It's like reading a contact drunk 14 year old cheerleader.
Re: LSAC3.65LSAT 168-171BUT!13 Fs from 10years ago C&F CRISIS
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 1:40 am
Jesus Christ. Chill the fuck outshoulinpandas wrote:LSAC 3.65 LSAT PTS 168-171 BUT!!!! 13 Semesters Credits Straight Fs from 10 years ago in HS dropin GPA to 3.2 WTF do I do C&F CRISIS?!!!!!!!!!!! HELP.... i see t14 death and the t20 fading from my reality....
Disclose?
Amend LS APP once admitted? Possible?
Nondisclosure and C&F denied?
WTF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Advice please
Re: LSAC3.65LSAT 168-171BUT!13 Fs from 10years ago C&F CRISIS
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 1:43 am
And yes, must must must disclose. Not disclosing is automatic denial once they find out (and they will). Did you mention you hadn't officially taken LSAT yet (PT 168-171)?If not, just keep focusing on acing that test.
Re: LSAC3.65LSAT 168-171BUT!13 Fs from 10years ago C&F CRISIS
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 1:45 am
Please do not say that (I know, I don't have to read it, but many people including myself find it pretty offensive)RedBirds2011 wrote:shoulinpandas wrote:LSAC 3.65 LSAT PTS 168-171 BUT!!!! 13 Semesters Credits Straight Fs from 10 years ago in HS dropin GPA to 3.2 WTF do I do C&F CRISIS?!!!!!!!!!!! HELP.... i see t14 death and the t20 fading from my reality....
Disclose?
Amend LS APP once admitted? Possible?
Nondisclosure and C&F denied?
WTF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Advice pleaseJesus Christ. Chill the fuck out
Re: LSAC3.65LSAT 168-171BUT!13 Fs from 10years ago C&F CRISIS
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 1:52 am
Br3v wrote:Please do not say that (I know, I don't have to read it, but many people including myself find it pretty offensive)RedBirds2011 wrote:shoulinpandas wrote:LSAC 3.65 LSAT PTS 168-171 BUT!!!! 13 Semesters Credits Straight Fs from 10 years ago in HS dropin GPA to 3.2 WTF do I do C&F CRISIS?!!!!!!!!!!! HELP.... i see t14 death and the t20 fading from my reality....
Disclose?
Amend LS APP once admitted? Possible?
Nondisclosure and C&F denied?
WTF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Advice pleaseJesus Christ. Chill the fuck out
Sorry dad Lol
Jeepers, chill! is that better?
You shouldnt take offense to someone you have never met over an Internet forum. If you do, then either ignore it or get off the internet. Especially, when said person is not even insulting you.
With that said, I'll respectfully refrain anyway.
Re: LSAC3.65LSAT 168-171BUT!13 Fs from 10years ago C&F CRISIS
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 1:53 am
Seriously. So wait I still don't understand what is your real GPA? 3.2?Jaeger wrote:Please, for the love of God, work on your writing skills too. It's like reading a contact drunk 14 year old cheerleader.
Re: LSAC3.65LSAT 168-171BUT!13 Fs from 10years ago C&F CRISIS
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 2:04 am
Re: LSAC3.65LSAT 168-171BUT!13 Fs from 10years ago C&F CRISIS
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 2:05 am
shoulinpandas wrote:LOL!Jaeger wrote:Please, for the love of God, work on your writing skills too. It's like reading a contact drunk 14 year old cheerleader.
Not the desired effect.
Re: LSAC3.65LSAT 168-171BUT!13 Fs from 10years ago C&F CRISIS
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 2:09 am
Re: LSAC3.65LSAT 168-171BUT!13 Fs from 10years ago C&F CRISIS
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 2:14 am
You definitely have to disclose those grades. But don't despair yet. A 3.1 or 3.2 does not shut you out of the t14 provided your LSAT score is 170 or above.
Re: LSAC3.65LSAT 168-171BUT!13 Fs from 10years ago C&F CRISIS
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 2:15 am
If you can actually pull off a 170+ on the LSAT, you still have a decent shot at the lower T14, no? And if high school was ten years ago (unless this was just hysterical hyperbole) then you should have an interesting life story and a LOT of distance between you and those bad grades. Welcome to the splitter club...shoulinpandas wrote:pt range 168-171
GPA according to LSP will be 3.17
after this quarter 3.21 probable
applications go out next cycle
drop in lsat takers may help
btw im calming down... slowly
Re: LSAC3.65LSAT 168-171BUT!13 Fs from 10years ago C&F CRISIS
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 2:16 am
Re: LSAC3.65LSAT 168-171BUT!13 Fs from 10years ago C&F CRISIS
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 2:26 am
It pains me to think this guy might get a better LSAT/go to a better school than me.shoulinpandas wrote:cool beans
needed that bro
im out bout to hit the books
Re: LSAC3.65LSAT 168-171BUT!13 Fs from 10years ago C&F CRISIS
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 2:27 am
Nah bro. With your GPA Harvard or bust.Jaeger wrote:It pains me to think this guy might get a better LSAT/go to a better school than me.shoulinpandas wrote:cool beans
needed that bro
im out bout to hit the books
Re: LSAC3.65LSAT 168-171BUT!13 Fs from 10years ago C&F CRISIS
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 2:28 am
Don't worry, maybe he'll be one of the examples where the writing sample on the LSAT causes you to underperform your numbers.Jaeger wrote:It pains me to think this guy might get a better LSAT/go to a better school than me.shoulinpandas wrote:cool beans
needed that bro
im out bout to hit the books
Re: LSAC3.65LSAT 168-171BUT!13 Fs from 10years ago C&F CRISIS
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 3:26 am
Re: LSAC3.65LSAT 168-171BUT!13 Fs from 10years ago C&F CRISIS
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 3:49 am
Yeah, his writing is pretty terrible. OP has to be a flame.
Re: LSAC3.65LSAT 168-171BUT!13 Fs from 10years ago C&F CRISIS
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 3:51 am
Geetar Man wrote:Yeah, his writing is pretty terrible. OP has to be aflame14.
Re: LSAC3.65LSAT 168-171BUT!13 Fs from 10years ago C&F CRISIS
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 3:56 am
Br3v wrote:Yeah, his writing is pretty terrible. OP has to be a 14
Or from the east coast. It's too hard to tell. Lol
Re: LSAC3.65LSAT 168-171BUT!13 Fs from 10years ago C&F CRISIS
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 4:11 am
It is pretty hard to believe that someone who has already invested enough time prepping for the LSAT to PT 168-171 and who knows to be worried about C&F would just now be realizing how LSAC calculates GPA's. If this is a flame, it needs some more spice. If it's not a flame, OP get off TLS and get back to studying.Geetar Man wrote:Yeah, his writing is pretty terrible. OP has to be a flame.
Re: LSAC3.65LSAT 168-171BUT!13 Fs from 10years ago C&F CRISIS
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 4:15 am
I figured it out, OP works for LSAT iphone app company and this is gorilla marketingalwayssunnyinfl wrote:It is pretty hard to believe that someone who has already invested enough time prepping for the LSAT to PT 168-171 and who knows to be worried about C&F would just now be realizing how LSAC calculates GPA's. If this is a flame, it needs some more spice. If it's not a flame, OP get off TLS and get back to studying.Geetar Man wrote:Yeah, his writing is pretty terrible. OP has to be a flame.
Re: LSAC3.65LSAT 168-171BUT!13 Fs from 10years ago C&F CRISIS
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 4:20 am
/threadBr3v wrote:I figured it out, OP works for LSAT iphone app company and this is gorilla marketingalwayssunnyinfl wrote:It is pretty hard to believe that someone who has already invested enough time prepping for the LSAT to PT 168-171 and who knows to be worried about C&F would just now be realizing how LSAC calculates GPA's. If this is a flame, it needs some more spice. If it's not a flame, OP get off TLS and get back to studying.Geetar Man wrote:Yeah, his writing is pretty terrible. OP has to be a flame.