Page 1 of 1
"Things May Be Even Worse Out There Than We Imagined"
Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2012 11:47 am
by NoJob
From Bernie Burk, a UNC law prof
http://www.thefacultylounge.org/2012/03 ... s-may.html
Nod to Campos for aggregating the info.
Re: "Things May Be Even Worse Out There Than We Imagined"
Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2012 11:48 am
by NoJob
Re: "Things May Be Even Worse Out There Than We Imagined"
Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2012 12:53 pm
by spleenworship
Interesting. Not surprising, but interesting.
Why won't the ABA put on probation and eventually remove any school with less than 60% bar passage or less than 60% employment of full time permanent JD required at 9 months? Oh, wait... money... nevermind.
Re: "Things May Be Even Worse Out There Than We Imagined"
Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2012 3:15 pm
by splitbrain
spleenworship wrote:Interesting. Not surprising, but interesting.
Why won't the ABA put on probation and eventually remove any school with less than 60% bar passage or less than 60% employment of full time permanent JD required at 9 months? Oh, wait... money... nevermind.
I think the rule is they have to have poor results 3 years in a row...I forget the specifics but I'll try and dig it up later if I have time.
Re: "Things May Be Even Worse Out There Than We Imagined"
Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2012 3:34 pm
by spleenworship
splitbrain wrote:spleenworship wrote:Interesting. Not surprising, but interesting.
Why won't the ABA put on probation and eventually remove any school with less than 60% bar passage or less than 60% employment of full time permanent JD required at 9 months? Oh, wait... money... nevermind.
I think the rule is they have to have poor results 3 years in a row...I forget the specifics but I'll try and dig it up later if I have time.
Yeah, but I bet they'd take any data thrown at them the next two years, no matter how doctored, in order to keep a school in. They don't want to un-accredit schools.