After a few drunk hours of browsing LSN for the first time Forum
- givemea170
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2011 5:42 pm
After a few drunk hours of browsing LSN for the first time
I have a simple question. How the **** does a white male get a full scholarship? Christ... See 175 and 3.9 GPAs getting half scholarships if they are white males and 150's with 3.3 GPAs getting full scholarships to the same schools if they are anything but white males.
Shit is redonkulous.
Shit is redonkulous.
-
- Posts: 424
- Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 5:49 am
Re: After a few drunk hours of browsing LSN for the first time
Yep, it Sucks to be a white male. Especially if you're anglo-saxon and protestant. Land of the free my ass.
- Gecko of Doom
- Posts: 415
- Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 8:32 pm
Re: After a few drunk hours of browsing LSN for the first time
Wow.
Also, IBTL.
Also, IBTL.
-
- Posts: 1500
- Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2009 11:39 pm
Re: After a few drunk hours of browsing LSN for the first time
Supply and Demand, brother.
- DreamsInDigital
- Posts: 340
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 12:56 pm
Re: After a few drunk hours of browsing LSN for the first time
IBTInevitableAffirmativeActionLock
there's a thread for these sorts of posts.
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... ive+action
there's a thread for these sorts of posts.
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... ive+action
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- givemea170
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2011 5:42 pm
Re: After a few drunk hours of browsing LSN for the first time
Gecko of Doom wrote:Wow.
Also, IBTL.
I've never been PC. But this shit really is out of control. Applicants who are 100 times more qualified than other applicants should not get less money because of skin color. That shit is racist. Racism doesn't solve racism.
- givemea170
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2011 5:42 pm
Re: After a few drunk hours of browsing LSN for the first time
lol I'm not sure what you mean by this... I'm assuming that you mean that schools feel they need to offer more to URM's to get their numbers up. You're probably right, but fuck the laws/guidelines that make schools have to do that.flcath wrote:Supply and Demand, brother.
- Blessedassurance
- Posts: 2091
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2011 3:42 pm
Re: After a few drunk hours of browsing LSN for the first time
Write to your congressman.givemea170 wrote:I've never been PC. But this shit really is out of control. Applicants who are 100 times more qualified than other applicants should not get less money because of skin color. That shit is racist. Racism doesn't solve racism.
-
- Posts: 1500
- Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2009 11:39 pm
Re: After a few drunk hours of browsing LSN for the first time
Fewer than 30 blacks per year make above a 170. Competition for these applicants is intense.givemea170 wrote:lol I'm not sure what you mean by this... I'm assuming that you mean that schools feel they need to offer more to URM's to get their numbers up. You're probably right, but fuck the laws/guidelines that make schools have to do that.flcath wrote:Supply and Demand, brother.
Whites have a mean LSAT score of a 152, while blacks' is a 141. (See source above.) I'd say 9 points is about what the AA advantage usually comes out to.
-
- Posts: 1500
- Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2009 11:39 pm
Re: After a few drunk hours of browsing LSN for the first time
Plus bro, if we didn't have AA we'd have embarrassingly few doctors/lawyers in our society.
Hopefully one day it won't be needed anymore.
Hopefully one day it won't be needed anymore.
- NYC Law
- Posts: 1561
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2011 3:33 pm
Re: After a few drunk hours of browsing LSN for the first time
Last edited by NYC Law on Sun Jan 08, 2012 5:11 am, edited 1 time in total.
- givemea170
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2011 5:42 pm
Re: After a few drunk hours of browsing LSN for the first time
If anything, it should be based on SOCIOECONOMIC status only.flcath wrote:Plus bro, if we didn't have AA we'd have embarrassingly few doctors/lawyers in our society.
Hopefully one day it won't be needed anymore.
You're telling me that a black male that grows up in a rich family in a good town is more disadvantaged than a white male who grows up in some hick town in the south living in a double wide?
It is a severely flawed system, at best.
- Dany
- Posts: 11559
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 3:00 pm
Re: After a few drunk hours of browsing LSN for the first time
What valid and novel points.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1500
- Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2009 11:39 pm
Re: After a few drunk hours of browsing LSN for the first time
You're still thinking of it as a meritocracy (hardships of being black = bump based on merit). It's not about that.givemea170 wrote:If anything, it should be based on SOCIOECONOMIC status only.flcath wrote:Plus bro, if we didn't have AA we'd have embarrassingly few doctors/lawyers in our society.
Hopefully one day it won't be needed anymore.
You're telling me that a black male that grows up in a rich family in a good town is more disadvantaged than a white male who grows up in some hick town in the south living in a double wide?
It is a severely flawed system, at best.
It's about not having a society run entirely by whites. This is especially important in the legal industry, since blacks (not being funny here) are so often are on the "business end" of the criminal justice system.
- givemea170
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2011 5:42 pm
Re: After a few drunk hours of browsing LSN for the first time
flcath wrote:You're still thinking of it as a meritocracy (hardships of being black = bump based on merit). It's not about that.givemea170 wrote:If anything, it should be based on SOCIOECONOMIC status only.flcath wrote:Plus bro, if we didn't have AA we'd have embarrassingly few doctors/lawyers in our society.
Hopefully one day it won't be needed anymore.
You're telling me that a black male that grows up in a rich family in a good town is more disadvantaged than a white male who grows up in some hick town in the south living in a double wide?
It is a severely flawed system, at best.
It's about not having a society run entirely by whites. This is especially important in the legal industry, since blacks (not being funny here) are so often are on the "business end" of the criminal justice system.
I'll never accept that kind of logic. Blacks run the NBA now, should we force teams to carry a certain number of white players that suck to keep things even? There is too wide of a discrepancy between 175 and 150 to just ignore and claim the difference in points is due to being held back due to skin color.
-
- Posts: 1500
- Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2009 11:39 pm
Re: After a few drunk hours of browsing LSN for the first time
We do give AA to white basketball players. They are more marketable, memorable (since they stick out), and appeal to a white suburban demographic that has a lot of disposable income.givemea170 wrote:flcath wrote:You're still thinking of it as a meritocracy (hardships of being black = bump based on merit). It's not about that.
It's about not having a society run entirely by whites. This is especially important in the legal industry, since blacks (not being funny here) are so often are on the "business end" of the criminal justice system.
I'll never accept that kind of logic. Blacks run the NBA now, should we force teams to carry a certain number of white players that suck to keep things even? There is too wide of a discrepancy between 175 and 150 to just ignore and claim the difference in points is due to being held back due to skin color.
- NYC Law
- Posts: 1561
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2011 3:33 pm
Re: After a few drunk hours of browsing LSN for the first time
Give an example of a black dominated industry that whites aspire to be a part of where there's more than a 0.0000001% chance of any given individual becoming a part of it, and I'll concede.givemea170 wrote: I'll never accept that kind of logic. Blacks run the NBA now, should we force teams to carry a certain number of white players that suck to keep things even? There is too wide of a discrepancy between 175 and 150 to just ignore and claim the difference in points is due to being held back due to skin color.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- givemea170
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2011 5:42 pm
Re: After a few drunk hours of browsing LSN for the first time
We do? Examples? Outside of Steve Nash I can't really think of a big name white basketball player. And he is obviously good enough to be on the team on his own merit considering he is a perennial all star.flcath wrote:We do give AA to white basketball players. They are more marketable, memorable (since they stick out), and appeal to a white suburban demographic that has a lot of disposable income.givemea170 wrote:flcath wrote:You're still thinking of it as a meritocracy (hardships of being black = bump based on merit). It's not about that.
It's about not having a society run entirely by whites. This is especially important in the legal industry, since blacks (not being funny here) are so often are on the "business end" of the criminal justice system.
I'll never accept that kind of logic. Blacks run the NBA now, should we force teams to carry a certain number of white players that suck to keep things even? There is too wide of a discrepancy between 175 and 150 to just ignore and claim the difference in points is due to being held back due to skin color.
- givemea170
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2011 5:42 pm
Re: After a few drunk hours of browsing LSN for the first time
NYC Law wrote:Give an example of a black dominated industry that whites aspire to be a part of where there's more than a 0.0000001% chance of any given individual becoming a part of it, and I'll concede.givemea170 wrote: I'll never accept that kind of logic. Blacks run the NBA now, should we force teams to carry a certain number of white players that suck to keep things even? There is too wide of a discrepancy between 175 and 150 to just ignore and claim the difference in points is due to being held back due to skin color.
I shouldn't have to prove anything like that. 175 > 150 by too wide of a margin to have that kind of scholarship money discrepancy.
To base more on skin color than LSAT/GPA is sad, to me. If you disagree, fine... but that 175 LSAT guy is most likely going to become a better lawyer... There is a big difference between scoring in the 99th percentile and scoring in the 50th percentile.
-
- Posts: 1500
- Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2009 11:39 pm
Re: After a few drunk hours of browsing LSN for the first time
There's Jason Kidd (who I guess is bi-racial, but whatevs). More importantly, look at how the NFL brands its QBs.givemea170 wrote:We do? Examples? Outside of Steve Nash I can't really think of a big name white basketball player. And he is obviously good enough to be on the team on his own merit considering he is a perennial all star.flcath wrote:We do give AA to white basketball players. They are more marketable, memorable (since they stick out), and appeal to a white suburban demographic that has a lot of disposable income.givemea170 wrote:flcath wrote:You're still thinking of it as a meritocracy (hardships of being black = bump based on merit). It's not about that.
It's about not having a society run entirely by whites. This is especially important in the legal industry, since blacks (not being funny here) are so often are on the "business end" of the criminal justice system.
I'll never accept that kind of logic. Blacks run the NBA now, should we force teams to carry a certain number of white players that suck to keep things even? There is too wide of a discrepancy between 175 and 150 to just ignore and claim the difference in points is due to being held back due to skin color.
-
- Posts: 1500
- Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2009 11:39 pm
Re: After a few drunk hours of browsing LSN for the first time
.NYC Law wrote:Give an example of a black dominated industry that whites aspire to be a part of where there's more than a 0.0000001% chance of any given individual becoming a part of it, and I'll concede.givemea170 wrote: I'll never accept that kind of logic. Blacks run the NBA now, should we force teams to carry a certain number of white players that suck to keep things even? There is too wide of a discrepancy between 175 and 150 to just ignore and claim the difference in points is due to being held back due to skin color.
Last edited by flcath on Sun Jan 08, 2012 5:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Blessedassurance
- Posts: 2091
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2011 3:42 pm
Re: After a few drunk hours of browsing LSN for the first time
Nowitzki, Ginobli, Pau Gasol?givemea170 wrote: We do? Examples? Outside of Steve Nash I can't really think of a big name white basketball player. And he is obviously good enough to be on the team on his own merit considering he is a perennial all star.
Darko was the second overall pick in the 2003 draft.
- givemea170
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2011 5:42 pm
Re: After a few drunk hours of browsing LSN for the first time
The sad reality is that black QBs usually struggle because most black QBs are running QBs and running QBs just do not pan out in the NFL unless they are named Michael Vick...
It has nothing to do with skin color, its just that black QBs rely on running too much in high school/college and then they get to the NFL and realize they can't run and are forced to pass, something they aren't as used to doing as someone like Peyton Manning who is slow as hell and has been a pocket passer since he was 10 years old.
If there ever came along a Peyton Manning or Tom Brady like QB that had black skin, he'd probably be the biggest name in the NFL.
It has nothing to do with skin color, its just that black QBs rely on running too much in high school/college and then they get to the NFL and realize they can't run and are forced to pass, something they aren't as used to doing as someone like Peyton Manning who is slow as hell and has been a pocket passer since he was 10 years old.
If there ever came along a Peyton Manning or Tom Brady like QB that had black skin, he'd probably be the biggest name in the NFL.
- givemea170
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2011 5:42 pm
Re: After a few drunk hours of browsing LSN for the first time
Well, getting into that point, I'd say African Americans were more marketable than Europeans... Proof is kind of in the 250,000,000 shoe deal Derrick Rose just signed. The most marketable players in the NBA are all black. We seem to be jumping topics too much now. I'm buzzed anyway.Blessedassurance wrote:Nowitzki, Ginobli, Pau Gasol?givemea170 wrote: We do? Examples? Outside of Steve Nash I can't really think of a big name white basketball player. And he is obviously good enough to be on the team on his own merit considering he is a perennial all star.
Darko was the second overall pick in the 2003 draft.
-
- Posts: 1500
- Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2009 11:39 pm
Re: After a few drunk hours of browsing LSN for the first time
I think a statement really, really close to this (that specifically related to Donovan McNabb) was what got Rush Limbaugh fired from commentating.givemea170 wrote:If there ever came along a Peyton Manning or Tom Brady like QB that had black skin, he'd probably be the biggest name in the NFL.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login