Bad idea for a splitter?
Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2011 5:28 pm
As a splitter, is it foolish of me NOT to provide a GPA addendum when a school allows it? Penn, for example, has the following prompt:
"If you do not think that your academic record or standardized test scores accurately reflect your ability to succeed in law school, please tell us why."
Clearly, any sub 3.4ish splitter applying to law school doesn't think their undergrad GPA is indicative of their potential, but regardless of how I answer this question I'd feel like I was whining/making excuses. Part of me thinks that accepting my GPA as it is, letting it speak for itself but otherwise building a very good application (and having a good LSAT) is the best way to go. But another part me thinks that a school might find it odd if you didn't answer the question, and think that perhaps you're too complacent. Am I over-thinking this?
"If you do not think that your academic record or standardized test scores accurately reflect your ability to succeed in law school, please tell us why."
Clearly, any sub 3.4ish splitter applying to law school doesn't think their undergrad GPA is indicative of their potential, but regardless of how I answer this question I'd feel like I was whining/making excuses. Part of me thinks that accepting my GPA as it is, letting it speak for itself but otherwise building a very good application (and having a good LSAT) is the best way to go. But another part me thinks that a school might find it odd if you didn't answer the question, and think that perhaps you're too complacent. Am I over-thinking this?