DUI Addendum Feedback
Posted: Tue Jul 12, 2011 8:00 pm
Hey everyone, I was wondering if I could get some feedback/ advice on this matter. I'm thinking that there may be too many details in this, but I'd like to hear some opinions. I really appreciate it.
Offense: Driving Under the Influence
Date of Offense: August 25th, 2010
Docket Number: NA
Court: NA
After three glasses of wine at a restaurant over the course of two hours during dinner, my friend- who was unfamiliar to the area- asked if she could follow me to our hometown. I did not notice any signs of caution that would put either others or myself in harm, so I agreed to drive and have her follow me.
Half way to our destination the alternator in my SUV seized working, causing me to pull over on the side of the highway. After several unsuccessful attempts to jump-startng, I called AAA who said they would tow my vehicle. Meanwhile, my friend said she was familiar enough with the area to get back alone and left.
While I was looking under the hood of my parked vehicle, a state police officer pulled behind my SUV. He approached me and, according to him, it was the smell of wine that led him to submit a field sobriety test and a breathalyzer. The officer read me my rights and gave me the option of refusing the breathalyzer, which- due to the implied consent law- would lead to an automatic license suspension. Because I did not know my B.A.C., I opted out of the breathalyzer. I felt as though I had to protect my self by omitting evidence I was unsure of. However, as it turns out in my case, refusing was not the best choice.
In fact, during the mandated Impaired Driver’s Intervention Program (IDIP) the instructor and I calculated that my BAC was a .047, nearly half of New Hampshire’s legal limit of. However, I took my attorney’s advice to avoid disputing the charges in trial. I did this because going to trial could have placed me at risk of receiving a harsher sentence then taking the plea offered by the State, which were the minimums for this charge (a court fee, temporary loss of license, and mandated attendance at a IDIP). Moreover, in fewer then twelve months this charge will be reduced to reckless driving.
With the risk of receiving the maximum sentences, I plead guilty to the State. Thereafter, I have been completely responsible and cooperative with each and every mandate. This was an isolated incident that I will never allow to reoccur. With the exception of this event, I am happy to say that I have not had any problems with alcohol. In closing, I would never turn the keys and drive a car if I thought I was impaired to the point that it would put others and myself at risk. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you would like more information on this matter.
Offense: Driving Under the Influence
Date of Offense: August 25th, 2010
Docket Number: NA
Court: NA
After three glasses of wine at a restaurant over the course of two hours during dinner, my friend- who was unfamiliar to the area- asked if she could follow me to our hometown. I did not notice any signs of caution that would put either others or myself in harm, so I agreed to drive and have her follow me.
Half way to our destination the alternator in my SUV seized working, causing me to pull over on the side of the highway. After several unsuccessful attempts to jump-startng, I called AAA who said they would tow my vehicle. Meanwhile, my friend said she was familiar enough with the area to get back alone and left.
While I was looking under the hood of my parked vehicle, a state police officer pulled behind my SUV. He approached me and, according to him, it was the smell of wine that led him to submit a field sobriety test and a breathalyzer. The officer read me my rights and gave me the option of refusing the breathalyzer, which- due to the implied consent law- would lead to an automatic license suspension. Because I did not know my B.A.C., I opted out of the breathalyzer. I felt as though I had to protect my self by omitting evidence I was unsure of. However, as it turns out in my case, refusing was not the best choice.
In fact, during the mandated Impaired Driver’s Intervention Program (IDIP) the instructor and I calculated that my BAC was a .047, nearly half of New Hampshire’s legal limit of. However, I took my attorney’s advice to avoid disputing the charges in trial. I did this because going to trial could have placed me at risk of receiving a harsher sentence then taking the plea offered by the State, which were the minimums for this charge (a court fee, temporary loss of license, and mandated attendance at a IDIP). Moreover, in fewer then twelve months this charge will be reduced to reckless driving.
With the risk of receiving the maximum sentences, I plead guilty to the State. Thereafter, I have been completely responsible and cooperative with each and every mandate. This was an isolated incident that I will never allow to reoccur. With the exception of this event, I am happy to say that I have not had any problems with alcohol. In closing, I would never turn the keys and drive a car if I thought I was impaired to the point that it would put others and myself at risk. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you would like more information on this matter.