Is UCLA notoriously slow?
Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 11:21 am
I'm a 169 and 3.9+ guy and I still haven't heard back from them despite applying last year 

Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=150765
jrose5 wrote:Hm...
I hate to be the one to break it to you guys, but no, they are not notoriously slow. I got my decision from them back in January, exactly two weeks from the day I submitted. Scholarship offer included. I was definitely not an auto-admit, either, imo.
Really? Why not just admit me and send money later?AreJay711 wrote:I have similar numbers and was waitlisted. I think they were considering offering you a financial aid package if some people declined so they are waiting for people to withdraw first. It sucks from me because I tried to withdraw my application because I was accepted somewhere but still managed to get a waitlist on my cycle.
Maybe selectivity? IDK. I'm surprised I wasn't accepted so that might be why especially if you are aren't from the West Coast. They probably figure you have other options that you might choose first if you didn't specify a desire to go to school in California or LA. If you don't get money you also might jump on another school that does so they might want to wait to see what they can offer.Rory1987 wrote:Really? Why not just admit me and send money later?AreJay711 wrote:I have similar numbers and was waitlisted. I think they were considering offering you a financial aid package if some people declined so they are waiting for people to withdraw first. It sucks from me because I tried to withdraw my application because I was accepted somewhere but still managed to get a waitlist on my cycle.
I guess I should write a LOCI.AreJay711 wrote:Maybe selectivity? IDK. I'm surprised I wasn't accepted so that might be why especially if you are aren't from the West Coast. They probably figure you have other options that you might choose first if you didn't specify a desire to go to school in California or LA. If you don't get money you also might jump on another school that does so they might want to wait to see what they can offer.Rory1987 wrote:Really? Why not just admit me and send money later?AreJay711 wrote:I have similar numbers and was waitlisted. I think they were considering offering you a financial aid package if some people declined so they are waiting for people to withdraw first. It sucks from me because I tried to withdraw my application because I was accepted somewhere but still managed to get a waitlist on my cycle.
damn that's gonna hurt you at OCIAreJay711 wrote:I tried to withdraw my application because I was accepted somewhere but still managed to get a waitlist on my cycle.
Meh, you can't draw that conclusion from your own personal experience. I've been accepted in 3 weeks at places friends with similar stats are still in review at.jrose5 wrote:Hm...
I hate to be the one to break it to you guys, but no, they are not notoriously slow. I got my decision from them back in January, exactly two weeks from the day I submitted. Scholarship offer included. I was definitely not an auto-admit, either, imo.
fatduck wrote:damn that's gonna hurt you at OCIAreJay711 wrote:I tried to withdraw my application because I was accepted somewhere but still managed to get a waitlist on my cycle.
I assume, since I didn't include any sort of why ucla info or anything, that I am going to get waitlisted due to YPparsi wrote:I'm a socal resident that applied on 12/22..3.9/171. I'm still waiting too
I'm tempted to call up UCLA and ask about the status of my application, in the hopes that they'll immediately tell me that I'm in with a full ride. I know a phone call is not going to get me in, but I can dream...gochrisgo wrote:I applied in November (169, 3.last cycle. I didn't hear anything forever. Finally, I called them in April and said, "Just want to check up on my app - I haven't heard anything."
About 36 hours passed and I got an email and a phone call telling me I was in. I eventually got an email telling me I had a scholly for $60k. I'm not sure if they forgot about me or wanted to make sure I wanted to come. UCLA is badass -- their student day thing was cool.
So yes, in my case it seemed like they were really slow. Also, I remember that happening a lot last year. I don't know wtf the other guys are talking about with saying that "they're super fast all the time" or whatever. Didn't seem to be true last year, anyhow.
GL bro.
Oh what the hell maybe I will call them. Guess it couldn't hurt. I'm just trying to figure out how to email/call them without sounding like a pain in the ass.huckster wrote:I applied in November (167/3.85) and two weeks later met Dean Schwartz at a law school forum. When I asked him about the turnaround time for a decision, he had me email him so that he could take a look at my app. I received a call with an acceptance two days later. IMO, making contact with UCLA admissions and showing interest seems to help.
Hey, you are telling the wrong people! I would write that in a LOCI and send it off to UCLA... fast.Rory1987 wrote:They just need to let me in! They'd be one of my top choices.
I sent off an email this weekend. I hope this facilitates things. If they let me in and throw a little money my way it would be hard to turn down LA.jrose5 wrote:Hey, you are telling the wrong people! I would write that in a LOCI and send it off to UCLA... fast.Rory1987 wrote:They just need to let me in! They'd be one of my top choices.