Definitive F**king End to T14 Discussion Forum
-
- Posts: 2508
- Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 8:15 pm
Definitive F**king End to T14 Discussion
T14 are schools that have been ranked in the top 10. Texas has been ranked in #11 before in 1987. For reference go to http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... ?f=1&t=213
Stop citing wikipedia for your definition of the T14. IT'S WRONG.
Stop citing wikipedia for your definition of the T14. IT'S WRONG.
- Hank Chill
- Posts: 120
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2011 10:53 pm
Re: Definitive Fucking End to T14 Discussion
--ImageRemoved--whymeohgodno wrote:T14 are schools that have been ranked in the top 10. Texas has been ranked in #11 before in 1987. For reference go to http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... ?f=1&t=213
Stop citing wikipedia for your definition of the T14. IT'S WRONG.
- MrPapagiorgio
- Posts: 1740
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2010 2:36 am
Re: Definitive Fucking End to T14 Discussion
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 5&t=147947Hank Chill wrote:--ImageRemoved--whymeohgodno wrote:T14 are schools that have been ranked in the top 10. Texas has been ranked in #11 before in 1987. For reference go to http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... ?f=1&t=213
Stop citing wikipedia for your definition of the T14. IT'S WRONG.
You were a Texas troll before the rankings. I'll at least give you that.
Last edited by MrPapagiorgio on Thu Mar 17, 2011 11:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
- deadpoetnsp
- Posts: 145
- Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 6:57 pm
Re: Definitive Fucking End to T14 Discussion
The 1987 rankings cannot be effectively compared to the current rankings since they included only about 50 schools or so. Hence it is possible that some school ranked lower than 50 could have had a higher subcategory score than UT, leading to dilution of UT's overall rank.
-
- Posts: 2508
- Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 8:15 pm
Re: Definitive Fucking End to T14 Discussion
Doesn't change a thing. Top14=/=Schools that are in the top 14 spots.deadpoetnsp wrote:The 1987 rankings cannot be effectively compared to the current rankings since they included only about 50 schools or so. Hence it is possible that some school ranked lower than 50 could have had a higher subcategory score than UT, leading to dilution of UT's overall rank.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Hank Chill
- Posts: 120
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2011 10:53 pm
Re: Definitive Fucking End to T14 Discussion
MrPapagiorgio wrote:http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 5&t=147947Hank Chill wrote:--ImageRemoved--whymeohgodno wrote:T14 are schools that have been ranked in the top 10. Texas has been ranked in #11 before in 1987. For reference go to http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... ?f=1&t=213
Stop citing wikipedia for your definition of the T14. IT'S WRONG.
You were a Texas troll before the rankings. I'll at least give you that.
- src42
- Posts: 287
- Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2010 10:26 am
Re: Definitive Fucking End to T14 Discussion
So if Georgetown drops to 20, is it still considered a top 14?
- AreJay711
- Posts: 3406
- Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:51 pm
Re: Definitive Fucking End to T14 Discussion
Right. I think the "definition" of the t14 people are spouting is more of an observation of the schools that are consistently in the t14 rather than essential to the classification.src42 wrote:So if Georgetown drops to 20, is it still considered a top 14?
- fatduck
- Posts: 4135
- Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2010 10:16 pm
Re: Definitive Fucking End to T14 Discussion
i'm glad you made this thread because nothing is more important than whether a school is "t14" or not
- Kohinoor
- Posts: 2641
- Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 5:51 pm
Re: Definitive Fucking End to T14 Discussion
Georgetown is considered a top 14?src42 wrote:So if Georgetown drops to 20, is it still considered a top 14?