Harvard vs. Rubenstein vs. Darrow (Non-Biglaw/clerkship)
Posted: Sun Feb 20, 2011 6:19 pm
I hate to rehash this thread topic, especially since a lot of other posters have done it recently but I would like to ask everyone for some advice. Also, my goals seem to be much different than most TLS posters. Here's some information about my situation:
-22 yr old, graduated college in May 2010, been working full-time at a law firm since October.
-Lived in CA my whole life, I would like to live here after LS but not dead-set on it. (Haven't gotten into SLS yet)
-I am pretty debt averse, only have about 7000 in UG debt but I am pretty uncomfortable with taking on 160-200 K for LS. (I would probably take on about 60K at Chicago for COL, 40K for UMich, 160-200K for HLS)
I am extremely torn between these options because and searching TLS hasn't helped me so far because most of the forums are about these schools' various differences in terms of BigLaw placement and clerkship opportunities, neither of which I am particularly interested in. My main goals are to work as a public defender or district attorney and then work my way into local government. After interning in this field and speaking with several judges and attorneys, it is my understanding that the prestige of the school you go to doesn't matter as much as with other fields.
I also understand that many counties and cities are not hiring for these positions right now which makes taking on less debt for my legal education a much more attractive option if I have to wait until these positions open up after graduation.
I have not visited any of these schools yet but am going to their ASWs so this may be a little premature.
I understand that Harvard's supreme lay prestige seems to help for people interested in government work but does it help enough to justify taking on that much more debt? (I am not expecting to receive a lot of need based aid at HLS) I have looked into Harvard's LIPP program and it does seem to help but I would like to begin saving money for a house, car, etc. and not be in poverty until I am 35.
TLS has been an invaluable resource for me in this process and I appreciate all the help.
-22 yr old, graduated college in May 2010, been working full-time at a law firm since October.
-Lived in CA my whole life, I would like to live here after LS but not dead-set on it. (Haven't gotten into SLS yet)
-I am pretty debt averse, only have about 7000 in UG debt but I am pretty uncomfortable with taking on 160-200 K for LS. (I would probably take on about 60K at Chicago for COL, 40K for UMich, 160-200K for HLS)
I am extremely torn between these options because and searching TLS hasn't helped me so far because most of the forums are about these schools' various differences in terms of BigLaw placement and clerkship opportunities, neither of which I am particularly interested in. My main goals are to work as a public defender or district attorney and then work my way into local government. After interning in this field and speaking with several judges and attorneys, it is my understanding that the prestige of the school you go to doesn't matter as much as with other fields.
I also understand that many counties and cities are not hiring for these positions right now which makes taking on less debt for my legal education a much more attractive option if I have to wait until these positions open up after graduation.
I have not visited any of these schools yet but am going to their ASWs so this may be a little premature.
I understand that Harvard's supreme lay prestige seems to help for people interested in government work but does it help enough to justify taking on that much more debt? (I am not expecting to receive a lot of need based aid at HLS) I have looked into Harvard's LIPP program and it does seem to help but I would like to begin saving money for a house, car, etc. and not be in poverty until I am 35.
TLS has been an invaluable resource for me in this process and I appreciate all the help.