Taking 2 years off before law school
Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2010 9:17 pm
I graduated from college in May, and I just took the LSAT this October. I always planned to take a year off before law school, which is why I was in no rush to take the LSAT while I was still in school.
But recent circumstances have me thinking about whether taking 2 years off is an even better idea. My parents recently moved to Korea, and I thought that taking the year off would be a nice opportunity for me to become fluent in Korean (I'm at an adequate, but basic level). However, I also wanted to live in Europe for a little bit on a working holiday visa (I'm a Canadian citizen). I just arrived in Korea after remaining on campus to study for the LSATs, and it seems that I can't do both - become fluent in Korean and live in Europe - in the time between now and next fall.
I just got an interview for teaching English in Jeju Island, which is a large island at the very south of the Korean peninsula. It's a beautiful place that's a major tourist attraction. I've never really been outside of Seoul in Korea, and I think this would be a fantastic opportunity for me to see my ancestral country, make some money, and improve my Korean. However, if I take the job, I will probably not be able to do the Europe thing.
I'm now thinking of taking two years off, which I've thought about before. That way, I'll get to do everything I want with plenty of time to spare. I see no particular advantage of going into law school quickly: the job market sucks, and going into 1L without any regrets is probably extremely wise. Some of the downsides are that I'd be delaying the start of my career by a year, and I may be a bit rusty in terms of studying.
But the way I look at it, once I start law school, I won't have any more chances to simply enjoy myself and will have to be focused on my career. What's the rush? Why not take another year off?
What do you think? In my situation, would taking a couple of years off be worth it?
But recent circumstances have me thinking about whether taking 2 years off is an even better idea. My parents recently moved to Korea, and I thought that taking the year off would be a nice opportunity for me to become fluent in Korean (I'm at an adequate, but basic level). However, I also wanted to live in Europe for a little bit on a working holiday visa (I'm a Canadian citizen). I just arrived in Korea after remaining on campus to study for the LSATs, and it seems that I can't do both - become fluent in Korean and live in Europe - in the time between now and next fall.
I just got an interview for teaching English in Jeju Island, which is a large island at the very south of the Korean peninsula. It's a beautiful place that's a major tourist attraction. I've never really been outside of Seoul in Korea, and I think this would be a fantastic opportunity for me to see my ancestral country, make some money, and improve my Korean. However, if I take the job, I will probably not be able to do the Europe thing.
I'm now thinking of taking two years off, which I've thought about before. That way, I'll get to do everything I want with plenty of time to spare. I see no particular advantage of going into law school quickly: the job market sucks, and going into 1L without any regrets is probably extremely wise. Some of the downsides are that I'd be delaying the start of my career by a year, and I may be a bit rusty in terms of studying.
But the way I look at it, once I start law school, I won't have any more chances to simply enjoy myself and will have to be focused on my career. What's the rush? Why not take another year off?
What do you think? In my situation, would taking a couple of years off be worth it?