Splitter Friendly T14 Schools
Posted: Tue Sep 21, 2010 8:40 am
Which are the most splitter friendly, and which are basically a no-go. In general, for everyone, and then specifically for someone who's not a total splitter, say 3.5 GPA?
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=130461
Chicago is more splitter friendly than Columbia. Also Harvard is not splitter friendly unless you consider a 3.85 gpa splitter status.d34dluk3 wrote:IMO
Most splitter friendly
Harvard (not with a 3.5 tho)
Columbia
Michigan
Virginia
Penn
Northwestern
In between
Chicago
NYU
Duke
Cornell
Georgetown
Least splitter friendly
Yale
Stanford
Boalt
LSN graph says otherwise re Chicago/Columbia, but that's hardly conclusive proof. What is your reasoning?Sentry wrote:Chicago is more splitter friendly than Columbia. Also Harvard is not splitter friendly unless you consider a 3.85 gpa splitter status.
I was going by Chicago's sub 3.6 25th. I thought Harvard had a pretty well defined floor of 3.8 no matter what your LSAT was?d34dluk3 wrote:LSN graph says otherwise re Chicago/Columbia, but that's hardly conclusive proof. What is your reasoning?Sentry wrote:Chicago is more splitter friendly than Columbia. Also Harvard is not splitter friendly unless you consider a 3.85 gpa splitter status.
IMO NYU is not really skewed toward splitters; there's just a significant drop-off in student quality from CC.
I'm a splitter at Harvard, and I would have been auto-admit under Stock. Under Rubinstein, my chances are much worse. Also, 3.85 doesn't even split Harvard. Their 25th is 3.78 this year. 3.6+ has a shot, which is pretty friendly IMO.
Soft floor for harvard is prob around 3.8, hard floor at 3.6Sentry wrote:I was going by Chicago's sub 3.5 25th. I thought Harvard had a pretty well defined floor of 3.8 no matter what your LSAT was?d34dluk3 wrote:LSN graph says otherwise re Chicago/Columbia, but that's hardly conclusive proof. What is your reasoning?Sentry wrote:Chicago is more splitter friendly than Columbia. Also Harvard is not splitter friendly unless you consider a 3.85 gpa splitter status.
IMO NYU is not really skewed toward splitters; there's just a significant drop-off in student quality from CC.
I'm a splitter at Harvard, and I would have been auto-admit under Stock. Under Rubinstein, my chances are much worse. Also, 3.85 doesn't even split Harvard. Their 25th is 3.78 this year. 3.6+ has a shot, which is pretty friendly IMO.
Huh? NYU has a significant drop-off in student quality from CC? You realize that NYU has a higher median LSAT (172) and basically the same median GPA as Chicago right?d34dluk3 wrote:LSN graph says otherwise re Chicago/Columbia, but that's hardly conclusive proof. What is your reasoning?Sentry wrote:Chicago is more splitter friendly than Columbia. Also Harvard is not splitter friendly unless you consider a 3.85 gpa splitter status.
IMO NYU is not really skewed toward splitters; there's just a significant drop-off in student quality from CC.
I'm a splitter at Harvard, and I would have been auto-admit under Stock. Under Rubinstein, my chances are much worse. Also, 3.85 doesn't even split Harvard. Their 25th is 3.78 this year. 3.6+ has a shot, which is pretty friendly IMO.
You're actually right. My bad.ravens20 wrote:Huh? NYU has a significant drop-off in student quality from CC? You realize that NYU has a higher median LSAT (172) and basically the same median GPA as Chicago right?