Please remove tls articles from the home page. Forum

[DeSimone]

Isn't it easier to just ignore them?

it might be easier, but becomes annoying after a while. why do something you don't have to?

[emorystud2010]

.

[miamiman]

I was hoping someone would just come out and say it already. It's really annoying the way it is now.

[kazu]

I just bookmarked "View active topics"... had to go look at the TLS main page now to see what you guys meant

Maybe it's to promote the articles better? I got to know the forums first, and I remember when a lot of people on here complained about the articles being "hidden" - the links on the top of the page looked too much like google ads for anyone to actually take them seriously. This was before the site was revamped. Don't remember/know what the main page looked like then either, though.........

[DeSimone]

I just bookmarked "View active topics"... had to go look at the TLS main page now to see what you guys meant

Maybe it's to promote the articles better? I got to know the forums first, and I remember when a lot of people on here complained about the articles being "hidden" - the links on the top of the page looked too much like google ads for anyone to actually take them seriously. This was before the site was revamped. Don't remember/know what the main page looked like then either, though.........

Credited, but this takes us back to the discussion of a compromise solution and displaying universally relevant articles.

[declsatkiller]

signed

[Sogui]

That biglaw relationships article nearly destroyed my relationship

[5ky]

agreed

[Jack Smirks]

+1000

[3ThrowAway99]

Well I think the articles being put first may be a more professional touch than having the response threads first (perhaps good for someone visiting the site for the first time), but like many of the commentators here, I also like having the threads first.

[Hey-O]

I agree. Switch the order.

[twert]

signed

[slacker]

Isn't there enough room for them to be side by side...?

[DeSimone]

mods?

[Bumi]

Compromise!

[DeSimone]

Compromise!

Removing 2-3 articles was not quite the point.

Now just whack the remaining two LRAP links, flip the order, and call it a deal.

[Rand M.]

Compromise!

Removing 2-3 articles was not quite the point.

Now just whack the remaining two LRAP links, flip the order, and call it a deal.

I wake up to find myself thinking the exact same thing. While I think it looks less ridiculous now than it did before, it is still not as good as it could be.

[Bumi]

While I think it looks less ridiculous now than it did before, it is still not as good as it could be.

Exactly! Compromise!

[SmittenMitten]

That biglaw relationships article nearly destroyed my relationship

+1 I looked at my little dog curled up on my lap and felt guilty.

[DeSimone]

While I think it looks less ridiculous now than it did before, it is still not as good as it could be.

Exactly! Compromise!

any compromise =/= good compromise

[Rowinguy2009]

Signed

[Bumi]

While I think it looks less ridiculous now than it did before, it is still not as good as it could be.

Exactly! Compromise!

any compromise =/= good compromise

Any joke != good joke, either, apparently. Everyone's a critic.

[PrincessLexiRae]

+1

[trialjunky]

I dont think i've been on the homepage except for a handful of time. Bookmarking str8 to active topics FTW