?
Posted: Thu Jul 08, 2010 11:15 pm
A
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=123369
deathviaboredom wrote:Which looks better, EIC, paralegal, or both?
I'm sorry...that's the wrong answer. If you're putting college shit on your resume "for the rest of your life," you've got bigger problems than this choice.r6_philly wrote:Both if you can, EIC if not. EIC can stay on your resume for the rest of your life and looks impressive. Paralegal is just a job - especially if you move on to better jobs.
probably this. also, this:MrKappus wrote:I'm sorry...that's the wrong answer. If you're putting college shit on your resume "for the rest of your life," you've got bigger problems than this choice.r6_philly wrote:Both if you can, EIC if not. EIC can stay on your resume for the rest of your life and looks impressive. Paralegal is just a job - especially if you move on to better jobs.
makes you sound like a douche.deathviaboredom wrote:I'm retaking the LSAT.\
...
Doing both is also appealing to me, but I have a history of overloading on courses and half-assing them, squeaking by with just As and A-s, not A+.
So, does this mean no EIC?MrKappus wrote:I'm sorry...that's the wrong answer. If you're putting college shit on your resume "for the rest of your life," you've got bigger problems than this choice.r6_philly wrote:Both if you can, EIC if not. EIC can stay on your resume for the rest of your life and looks impressive. Paralegal is just a job - especially if you move on to better jobs.
Do what you will, sir...but I've reviewed resumes, and I'd say "co-editor" and "editor" are about equal. Given that fact, make some atty connections.deathviaboredom wrote:So, does this mean no EIC?
The A comment was supposed to be ironic. I do tend to overload and I have good grades but no good LORs as a result.
Ha...no. Forgive my lack of clarity. Choose "co-editor in chief" and take the paralegal job.deathviaboredom wrote:are you suggesting both?
Sorry...was of the understanding OP would get paid for reg. (<40 hrs) time and still be able to work a co-editor job. If not, EIC and classes + LSAT prep FTW.creamedcats wrote:EIC, take the classes you enjoy. Doesn't that just feel more right to you? Are you rearing to go paralegal for a tiny law firm and not get paid?
If nothing else, having attorney references that you can list during for OCI will be considerably more impressive than [not co-]EIC on your resume. Just IMO.deathviaboredom wrote:No, that's right.MrKappus wrote:Sorry...was of the understanding OP would get paid for reg. (<40 hrs) time and still be able to work a co-editor job. If not, EIC and classes + LSAT prep FTW.creamedcats wrote:EIC, take the classes you enjoy. Doesn't that just feel more right to you? Are you rearing to go paralegal for a tiny law firm and not get paid?
9-530, paid. and still be able to do co-editor.
Haha aaaaaaaaaaaaaaagghhhhhhhhhhhhh...YES. Be a co-EIC and take the paralegal job! IMO. Or don't. Do what makes you happy, man.deathviaboredom wrote:So paralegal over EIC? What about both?
Let's compare careers and see if I have any problems - because I don't. College always stays on the resume, just at the bottom. Earlier work gets trimmed. As a matter of fact, people are always interested in asking about what I did in college. You do a job for money, you do stuff in college because you want it, it says more about you and is always a convo starter.MrKappus wrote:I'm sorry...that's the wrong answer. If you're putting college shit on your resume "for the rest of your life," you've got bigger problems than this choice.r6_philly wrote:Both if you can, EIC if not. EIC can stay on your resume for the rest of your life and looks impressive. Paralegal is just a job - especially if you move on to better jobs.