Median Application Method (MAM)!
Posted: Mon Jul 05, 2010 11:43 am
While lawschoolpredictor and lawschoolnumbers are great resources for those trying to determine which schools to apply to, there is another important resource that every applicant should also use.
Schools fight hard for their medians for the LSAT and undergradGPA. This is so because these are central statistics in how they are ranked by US News. However, for some reason, median scores are often not listed on most websites: rather, just the 25th and 75th percentiles are listed. Now, the 25th and 75th percentiles are good, but median numbers are much more helpful. The medians I list here are from LSAC's page for each school. Call what follows 'the median application method', or 'MAM' for short. MAM is to some extent cynical, because it implies that schools' claims to a holistic application process are misleading. I feel it is realistic.
Here are the top schools in t14 order (P and B are tied):
Y 3.90 173
H 3.89 173
S 3.88 170
Co 3.72 172
Ch 3.76 171
N 3.72 171
P 3.82 170
B 3.83 168
M 3.70 169
V 3.85 170
D 3.76 169
Nw 3.72 170
C 3.63 167
G 3.65 169
Adjust LSAT score for URM status, if appropriate. Each applicant will fall into exactly one of three categories for each of the schools listed above: (1) at or above both medians, (2) at or above just one median, and (3) below both medians. While there are no universal rules that apply to these categories, we can make some generalizations which largely, though not always, hold.
For those who fall into category (1) for a given school, your chances of admission are between good and very good, depending on the particulars of the school. You should apply to that school. Schools with large class sizes, such as H, NYU and G simply have to admit a large percentage of those above both medians. In some rare cases, applicant are so far above the medians at a given school that they feel that applying would be a waste of time.
For those who fall into category (2), there are two important sub-groups here: group (2a) is composed of those who are at or above median LSAT, while group (2b) is for those who are at or above median uGPA. In general, those in group (2a) have a better shot of admissions than those who fall into group (2b); though some schools, such as B and S, are said to emphasize uGPA. Chances of admission will vary in (2), depending on how far above the applicant is in one category, and how far below in the other category. Also, certain schools are known to take high LSATs accompanied by low uGPAs. Lastly, some schools have "floors" for certain numbers (below which they will not accept) no matter how high the other number. With the conditions above understood, those who fall in category (2a) can have from very good to acceptable chances of admission, while those who fall into (2b) can have from good to minimally possible chances of admission.
For those who fall into category (3), admission is possible. Chances of admission becomes more unlikely the further one gets from the medians. Schools don't necessarily know what their medians will be during the early and middle phases of the admissions cycle. Nevertheless, the LSAT medians have become very stable at each school, only varying a point from year to year if at all, but the uGPA medians do change somewhat from year to year. It helps here to look at medians over, say, the past three years. Accordingly, those who are just below both medians might have a fair chance of admission. With regard to those who are significantly below both medians, all I can say to you here is: good luck!
There are of course certain caveats to the generalizations above, but I hope that any applicant who stumbles across the MAM will find it helpful. I recommend that you use many sources for information in generating your list of schools; so don't rely entirely on the MAM!
Thoughts?
Schools fight hard for their medians for the LSAT and undergradGPA. This is so because these are central statistics in how they are ranked by US News. However, for some reason, median scores are often not listed on most websites: rather, just the 25th and 75th percentiles are listed. Now, the 25th and 75th percentiles are good, but median numbers are much more helpful. The medians I list here are from LSAC's page for each school. Call what follows 'the median application method', or 'MAM' for short. MAM is to some extent cynical, because it implies that schools' claims to a holistic application process are misleading. I feel it is realistic.
Here are the top schools in t14 order (P and B are tied):
Y 3.90 173
H 3.89 173
S 3.88 170
Co 3.72 172
Ch 3.76 171
N 3.72 171
P 3.82 170
B 3.83 168
M 3.70 169
V 3.85 170
D 3.76 169
Nw 3.72 170
C 3.63 167
G 3.65 169
Adjust LSAT score for URM status, if appropriate. Each applicant will fall into exactly one of three categories for each of the schools listed above: (1) at or above both medians, (2) at or above just one median, and (3) below both medians. While there are no universal rules that apply to these categories, we can make some generalizations which largely, though not always, hold.
For those who fall into category (1) for a given school, your chances of admission are between good and very good, depending on the particulars of the school. You should apply to that school. Schools with large class sizes, such as H, NYU and G simply have to admit a large percentage of those above both medians. In some rare cases, applicant are so far above the medians at a given school that they feel that applying would be a waste of time.
For those who fall into category (2), there are two important sub-groups here: group (2a) is composed of those who are at or above median LSAT, while group (2b) is for those who are at or above median uGPA. In general, those in group (2a) have a better shot of admissions than those who fall into group (2b); though some schools, such as B and S, are said to emphasize uGPA. Chances of admission will vary in (2), depending on how far above the applicant is in one category, and how far below in the other category. Also, certain schools are known to take high LSATs accompanied by low uGPAs. Lastly, some schools have "floors" for certain numbers (below which they will not accept) no matter how high the other number. With the conditions above understood, those who fall in category (2a) can have from very good to acceptable chances of admission, while those who fall into (2b) can have from good to minimally possible chances of admission.
For those who fall into category (3), admission is possible. Chances of admission becomes more unlikely the further one gets from the medians. Schools don't necessarily know what their medians will be during the early and middle phases of the admissions cycle. Nevertheless, the LSAT medians have become very stable at each school, only varying a point from year to year if at all, but the uGPA medians do change somewhat from year to year. It helps here to look at medians over, say, the past three years. Accordingly, those who are just below both medians might have a fair chance of admission. With regard to those who are significantly below both medians, all I can say to you here is: good luck!
There are of course certain caveats to the generalizations above, but I hope that any applicant who stumbles across the MAM will find it helpful. I recommend that you use many sources for information in generating your list of schools; so don't rely entirely on the MAM!
Thoughts?