Page 1 of 1
160 LSAT Worked 40-50 hours per week Would Addendum Help?
Posted: Sun Jul 04, 2010 2:02 pm
by Nola
Hey guys the title says it all what do you think?
Re: 160 LSAT Worked 40-50 hours per week Would Addendum Help?
Posted: Sun Jul 04, 2010 2:06 pm
by kalvano
Not really. I was working 65+ hours a week.
If you think you can do better, retake. An addendum isn't some magical talisman that make them sit up and go "Oh, well, in that case..."
Re: 160 LSAT Worked 40-50 hours per week Would Addendum Help?
Posted: Sun Jul 04, 2010 6:27 pm
by ScaredWorkedBored
The addendum for an LSAT is retaking it and doing significantly better.
Re: 160 LSAT Worked 40-50 hours per week Would Addendum Help?
Posted: Sun Jul 04, 2010 6:42 pm
by pinkzeppelin
ScaredWorkedBored wrote:The addendum for an LSAT is retaking it and doing significantly better.
This isn't true. An addendum can be used to explain any extraordinary circumstance. That said: the OP's situation definitely does not warrant an addendum. 40-50 hours per week? Who isn't doing that? You'll sound whiny.
Re: 160 LSAT Worked 40-50 hours per week Would Addendum Help?
Posted: Sun Jul 04, 2010 6:58 pm
by ScaredWorkedBored
I'm scratching my head as to what an "extraordinary circumstance" for the LSAT that you didn't somehow cancel on the spot would be.
Re: 160 LSAT Worked 40-50 hours per week Would Addendum Help?
Posted: Sun Jul 04, 2010 7:01 pm
by hypothalamus
Check out the "bad test taker" clause. That addendum requires proof of poor SAT performance as well, though.
Re: 160 LSAT Worked 40-50 hours per week Would Addendum Help?
Posted: Sun Jul 04, 2010 8:11 pm
by capitalacq
Nola wrote:Hey guys the title says it all what do you think?
bad idea. don't do it
/endthread