Would Being Above/Below the Median GPA Decide Harvard?
Posted: Mon May 17, 2010 9:06 pm
Hey Guys!
I've done my research and know that admissions to Harvard is very numbers-driven.
I just finished my 3rd year and my LSAC GPA is 3.87. I plan to apply in early October.
The median GPA of successful Harvard applicants is 3.88, according to the ABA Report.
If I take my summer classes, I can raise my GPA up to 3.89.
Would such a trivial difference (being below or above the median GPA by .1) be a deciding factor, considering how Harvard is so numbers-driven?
I've been studying the LSAT for quite a while, and I'm scoring between 170-174 on PTs now. I think I can raise it a few points by October.
So I'm wondering which option is better: 1) taking summer classes to boost my GPA above their median or 2) spending that time instead on studying LSAT to get 175+.
I'm not posting this to get some sort of reassuarance or brag about my GPA. In fact, it's the opposite, as throughout high school, I was a B- student, and I never really liked kids who bragged about their grades or cried over A-.
I'm genuinely interested in hearing the opinions of those who've already experienced the "cycle" and have knowledge about trivial differences in GPA making a difference in admissions, especially considering the numbers-driven nature of admissions to Harvard. I've worked very hard for the past three years to have a decent shot into getting into the law school of my dreams, and I would really appreciate if I could get some feedback.
Of course, when I make it to the finish line, I'll make sure to pass my knowledge/experience to future TSL-users.
Thanks =)
I've done my research and know that admissions to Harvard is very numbers-driven.
I just finished my 3rd year and my LSAC GPA is 3.87. I plan to apply in early October.
The median GPA of successful Harvard applicants is 3.88, according to the ABA Report.
If I take my summer classes, I can raise my GPA up to 3.89.
Would such a trivial difference (being below or above the median GPA by .1) be a deciding factor, considering how Harvard is so numbers-driven?
I've been studying the LSAT for quite a while, and I'm scoring between 170-174 on PTs now. I think I can raise it a few points by October.
So I'm wondering which option is better: 1) taking summer classes to boost my GPA above their median or 2) spending that time instead on studying LSAT to get 175+.
I'm not posting this to get some sort of reassuarance or brag about my GPA. In fact, it's the opposite, as throughout high school, I was a B- student, and I never really liked kids who bragged about their grades or cried over A-.
I'm genuinely interested in hearing the opinions of those who've already experienced the "cycle" and have knowledge about trivial differences in GPA making a difference in admissions, especially considering the numbers-driven nature of admissions to Harvard. I've worked very hard for the past three years to have a decent shot into getting into the law school of my dreams, and I would really appreciate if I could get some feedback.
Of course, when I make it to the finish line, I'll make sure to pass my knowledge/experience to future TSL-users.
Thanks =)