UG stat averages--what do they mean?
Posted: Sat May 08, 2010 10:40 am
In another thread, it was mentioned that Harvard law-school-bound students average a 3.5 GPA and a 165 LSAT.
Let's say that my school averages a 3.2 GPA and a 149, because I'm going to a third-tier public undergrad where it's halfway surprising if graduates are actually literate.
Does this make a person with a totally-hypothetical-and-not-my-stats 3.8 and a 170 look better to admissions if they're coming from a school where everybody did almost that well, or where they're coming from a school where most people did considerably worse? I'm guessing these statistics are provided for a reason, but I'm not sure which direction the reasoning goes. I'm not sure how you could form any meaningful comparison between "this person is way smarter than a bunch of idiots" and "this other person is slightly smarter than a bunch of smart people"?
Let's say that my school averages a 3.2 GPA and a 149, because I'm going to a third-tier public undergrad where it's halfway surprising if graduates are actually literate.
Does this make a person with a totally-hypothetical-and-not-my-stats 3.8 and a 170 look better to admissions if they're coming from a school where everybody did almost that well, or where they're coming from a school where most people did considerably worse? I'm guessing these statistics are provided for a reason, but I'm not sure which direction the reasoning goes. I'm not sure how you could form any meaningful comparison between "this person is way smarter than a bunch of idiots" and "this other person is slightly smarter than a bunch of smart people"?