I demand to know why the USNEWS rankings have not leaked
Posted: Thu Apr 08, 2010 11:32 am
I mean, really. How else will I validate my existence?
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=113804
Hoping this is the year GULC make the t13?nealric wrote:I mean, really. How else will I validate my existence?
They are normally leaked by either xoxo, LSD, ATL, or TLS at least one week before release. It is now less than a week.when are they normally released?
(and yes on GULC)
I'm hoping this is the year I get a shiny gold star on my forehead because of the rank of the school I go to. And GULC has always been a T13 school. [Insert name of your school here] was never in the T13. USNEWS has simply been wrong all these years.Hoping this is the year GULC make the t13?
Great use of your 9000th post DF.Desert Fox wrote:Hoping this is the year GULC make the t13?nealric wrote:I mean, really. How else will I validate my existence?
Couldn't have timed it better if I tried.D-hops wrote:Great use of your 9000th post DF.Desert Fox wrote:Hoping this is the year GULC make the t13?nealric wrote:I mean, really. How else will I validate my existence?
Well now you have to wait for ammo for your 10k post.Desert Fox wrote:Couldn't have timed it better if I tried.D-hops wrote:Great use of your 9000th post DF.Desert Fox wrote:Hoping this is the year GULC make the t13?nealric wrote:I mean, really. How else will I validate my existence?
Georgetown is #2 in Cooley's ranking. That kind of makes up for it.
--ImageRemoved--nealric wrote:I mean, really. How else will I validate my existence?
He's clearly trying to break the T14 of posters.D-hops wrote:Great use of your 9000th post DF.Desert Fox wrote:Hoping this is the year GULC make the t13?nealric wrote:I mean, really. How else will I validate my existence?
Remember, he doesn't acknowledge the T14. He can only be in the T13 of posters or the T20.He's clearly trying to break the T14 of posters.
LOL true.nealric wrote:Remember, he doesn't acknowledge the T14. He can only be in the T13 of posters or the T20.He's clearly trying to break the T14 of posters.
ftfynealric wrote:Remember, he doesn't acknowledge the T14. He can only be in the T13 of posters or the [strike]T20[/strike] TTT.He's clearly trying to break the T14 of posters.
TY, you are correctftfy
Yeah. But someone should have a cousin's best friend's roommate who works at USNEWS. Or at least be a good computer hacker.It is simple: they were leaked in the past by people obtaining a copy of the paper magazine. Now, the paper magazine won't even be mailed to sellers until the rankings are posted online. Evidently, they are opting for tons of web traffic, but comparably fewer paper magazine sales. The real question is whether their web site will crash.
Bert wrote:Question for all of you on the USNWR rankings. Since the 2011 rankings being released in a couple weeks are based (at least partially) on data collected about the admissions criteria (GPA, LSAT, acceptance rate, etc.) at the various schools for the class entering in 2010, how can this data possibly be completely accurate and reportable, especially considering some schools have indicated that we will not hear a response until after the USNWR rankings have posted on the internet? Is it just that the schools have made a decision and not told everybody yet? Do the rankings get corrected at some future point in time? Is it just that the portion of the overall score given to these factors is so small that changes don't really sway the rankings? I know that there is a general feeling on TLS that the USNWR rankings are to be taken with a grain of salt, but as I continue to look into this it the USNWR seems to be more and more contrived.
TITCR. And employment data will be from 2008 graduates.jimicornerstone wrote:Bert wrote:Question for all of you on the USNWR rankings. Since the 2011 rankings being released in a couple weeks are based (at least partially) on data collected about the admissions criteria (GPA, LSAT, acceptance rate, etc.) at the various schools for the class entering in 2010, how can this data possibly be completely accurate and reportable, especially considering some schools have indicated that we will not hear a response until after the USNWR rankings have posted on the internet? Is it just that the schools have made a decision and not told everybody yet? Do the rankings get corrected at some future point in time? Is it just that the portion of the overall score given to these factors is so small that changes don't really sway the rankings? I know that there is a general feeling on TLS that the USNWR rankings are to be taken with a grain of salt, but as I continue to look into this it the USNWR seems to be more and more contrived.
it's based on the class that entered Fall '09.
Then why the heck don't they come out well before the deposit deadlines?ggocat wrote:TITCR. And employment data will be from 2008 graduates.jimicornerstone wrote:Bert wrote:Question for all of you on the USNWR rankings. Since the 2011 rankings being released in a couple weeks are based (at least partially) on data collected about the admissions criteria (GPA, LSAT, acceptance rate, etc.) at the various schools for the class entering in 2010, how can this data possibly be completely accurate and reportable, especially considering some schools have indicated that we will not hear a response until after the USNWR rankings have posted on the internet? Is it just that the schools have made a decision and not told everybody yet? Do the rankings get corrected at some future point in time? Is it just that the portion of the overall score given to these factors is so small that changes don't really sway the rankings? I know that there is a general feeling on TLS that the USNWR rankings are to be taken with a grain of salt, but as I continue to look into this it the USNWR seems to be more and more contrived.
it's based on the class that entered Fall '09.
So they can sit back and laugh at the droves of desperate law school hopefuls.SAE wrote:Then why the heck don't they come out well before the deposit deadlines?ggocat wrote:TITCR. And employment data will be from 2008 graduates.jimicornerstone wrote:Bert wrote:Question for all of you on the USNWR rankings. Since the 2011 rankings being released in a couple weeks are based (at least partially) on data collected about the admissions criteria (GPA, LSAT, acceptance rate, etc.) at the various schools for the class entering in 2010, how can this data possibly be completely accurate and reportable, especially considering some schools have indicated that we will not hear a response until after the USNWR rankings have posted on the internet? Is it just that the schools have made a decision and not told everybody yet? Do the rankings get corrected at some future point in time? Is it just that the portion of the overall score given to these factors is so small that changes don't really sway the rankings? I know that there is a general feeling on TLS that the USNWR rankings are to be taken with a grain of salt, but as I continue to look into this it the USNWR seems to be more and more contrived.
it's based on the class that entered Fall '09.