LOR from a relative Forum

(Applications Advice, Letters of Recommendation . . . )
Post Reply
User avatar
merichard87

Silver
Posts: 750
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 2:31 pm

LOR from a relative

Post by merichard87 » Tue Mar 30, 2010 2:37 pm

Ok guys quick question:

I was on another law school forum and read a post from a young man who was suggesting that he could get a LOR from his uncle who was a "famous University of Chicago law professor." Is it not against certain ethics to get LORs from relatives even if they are contributors to the law community and have a heavy name? Perhaps I'm a little naive about this type of thing but I just assumed that type of thing was frowned upon. Please give me some insight. Thanks guys.

CMDantes

Bronze
Posts: 420
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 2:37 pm

Re: LOR from a relative

Post by CMDantes » Tue Mar 30, 2010 2:42 pm

...
Last edited by CMDantes on Tue Jun 08, 2010 6:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Sauer Grapes

Silver
Posts: 1222
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 11:02 am

Re: LOR from a relative

Post by Sauer Grapes » Tue Mar 30, 2010 2:43 pm

merichard87 wrote:Ok guys quick question:

I was on another law school forum and read a post from a young man who was suggesting that he could get a LOR from his uncle who was a "famous University of Chicago law professor." Is it not against certain ethics to get LORs from relatives even if they are contributors to the law community and have a heavy name? Perhaps I'm a little naive about this type of thing but I just assumed that type of thing was frowned upon. Please give me some insight. Thanks guys.
I can't give you a solid answer on this, but think about it from an adcom's perspective (assuming it's obvious the person is a relative, i.e. mentioned in the LOR or same last name). If I were an adcom, I would place more weight on what your other recommender(s) say over a relative. Unless you are applying for Chicago and the professor is so highly respected that the adcom would not question his opinion, even of a relative, then I think a non-relative is a better option.

That being said, the situation you mention is like a perfect storm of whether or not you should be related to a recommender.

User avatar
Stanford4Me

Platinum
Posts: 6240
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2008 1:23 am

Re: LOR from a relative

Post by Stanford4Me » Tue Mar 30, 2010 2:44 pm

merichard87 wrote:Ok guys quick question:

I was on another law school forum
'Nuff said. TLS >>>>> All other law school forums. Ignore any advice read on other forums.

/thread.

MJMD

Bronze
Posts: 148
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2010 7:26 pm

Re: LOR from a relative

Post by MJMD » Tue Mar 30, 2010 2:50 pm

I have an uncle who's a named partner at a boutique firm and whom I would have considered using for an LOR if I didn't have references from my employers, but only because 1) he's related to me by marriage to my aunt, 2) we live very far apart from one another, and 3) we don't share the same last name. So basically, the adcomm would never have known that he was my uncle.

I'd look for references from someone else first, especially from someone who can provide more than just a general character reference; but if those 3 conditions hold, then I wouldn't worry too much about using an LOR from a relative outside of your immediate family.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Law School Admissions Forum”