Top Law Schools

Peter!! you're back. what happened yesterday???

and to answer your question: i've only ever 'befriended' someone if i have actually met him or her in person and had extended conversations. so, i would act accordingly regardless of the person's title. which dean has an e-harmony account? jeez. you know everything.

And the flood gates open.

Peter North wrote:I know of one other high-profile T14 admissions Dean who has a profile on eHarmony.

how do you know about this?

beef wellington wrote:

Peter North wrote:I know of one other high-profile T14 admissions Dean who has a profile on eHarmony.

how do you know about this?

Is this somehow related to another thread where you asked about what you should do if your ex is on an adcom?

I'd just date the adcomm's child.

If they are under 18, date the wife.

If they are single, date the mom.

Hypothetically, if you were an adcomm, would you mind if someone friended you on a social networking site?

well there goes the theory about error-free, impeccable posts

neskerdoo wrote:well there goes the theory about error-free, impeccable posts

Uh what? I don't really want to start this thread in every place that North posts, but that post is still a mimic of the blog that shall not be named.. Oddly though in the first paragraph after e-Harmony should have ended with an exclamation mark.

BTW, I wouldn't friend them until after admitted.

Sorry PN. You are not fooling anyone.

After the bombshell of a thread, PN tries to reintegrate back in to the TLS community. Oldest trick in the book. Sorry PN. No one's buying it.

Conclusive proof that PN is AR: http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 2&t=112109

I rest my case.

zozin wrote:Hypothetically, if you were an adcomm, would you...

Don't be stupid man. There is nothing hypothetical about this. See my above post.

keeping_an_open_mind wrote:

zozin wrote:Hypothetically, if you were an adcomm, would you...

Don't be stupid man. There is nothing hypothetical about this. See my above post.

Dude, don't mess with the mods. Your alt was banned once, stop messing around before your main account is IP banned.

zozin wrote:

keeping_an_open_mind wrote:

zozin wrote:Hypothetically, if you were an adcomm, would you...

Don't be stupid man. There is nothing hypothetical about this. See my above post.

Dude, don't mess with the mods. Your alt was banned once, stop messing around before your main account is IP banned.

+1, If you don't have permission don't do it. I also don't want all the North threads to be ambushed.. They are too classic for that...

keeping_an_open_mind wrote:Sorry PN. You are not fooling anyone.

After the bombshell of a thread, PN tries to reintegrate back in to the TLS community. Oldest trick in the book. Sorry PN. No one's buying it.

Conclusive proof that PN is AR: http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 2&t=112109

I rest my case.

What are you doing? Beta said the IPs didn't match. It's not her.

Two options: (1) PN is not AR and is kind of stupid. (2) PN is AR and she relies on your intelligence when she posts the exact type of posts that allegedly linked her to AR in hopes that TLSers will conclude that she is not the real AR because she tries hard to convince them that she is AR.

If option 2 is the right one, I am pissed. Get your ass back to your office, Ms. AR, and don't log onto TLS/ Linkedin/ pornographic websites (I am assuming we are not PN's fans because of his Con Law publications, correct?) until you send my file to faculty review!

In before the lock.

Peter North wrote:I know of one other high-profile T14 admissions Dean who has a profile on eHarmony.

this made me lol.

Peter North wrote:Josh R. from HLS is on Facebook. Asha R. from YLS is on LinkedIn. I know of one other high-profile T14 admissions Dean who has a profile on eHarmony. Various other Tier 1 admissions deans are on social networking sites.

Would it be appropriate for a perspective applicant to add the adcomm member as a "friend" or communicate with them just out of the blue?

I have one adcom as a friend. But it's at a school I am no longer interested in.

OK it's not AR.

keeping_an_open_mind wrote:Sorry PN. You are not fooling anyone.

After the bombshell of a thread, PN tries to reintegrate back in to the TLS community. Oldest trick in the book. Sorry PN. No one's buying it.

Conclusive proof that PN is AR: http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 2&t=112109

I rest my case.

Perhaps I'm a little wet behind the ears, but why was that thread locked?