Page 1 of 1

.

Posted: Sun Mar 07, 2010 3:45 am
by roranoa
.

Re: Is there living proof that it is really a numbers game?!

Posted: Sun Mar 07, 2010 3:58 am
by Cupidity
I'm living proof.

Softs don't matter at all ever. Not even kidding. Any lack of softs can easily be compensated for by an interesting PS.

Re: Is there living proof that it is really a numbers game?!

Posted: Sun Mar 07, 2010 4:00 am
by romothesavior
Someone please come post a big picture of fire

Re: Is there living proof that it is really a numbers game?!

Posted: Sun Mar 07, 2010 4:03 am
by Gamecubesupreme
Softs matter to law school the same way a girl's personality matters to guys. Which is to say not very much at all.

.

Posted: Sun Mar 07, 2010 4:10 am
by roranoa
.

Re: Is there living proof that it is really a numbers game?!

Posted: Sun Mar 07, 2010 4:39 am
by Grizz
romothesavior wrote:Someone please come post a big picture of fire
No problem.


Image

Re: Is there living proof that it is really a numbers game?!

Posted: Sun Mar 07, 2010 5:20 am
by huzhongxiaohe
roranoa wrote:
Cupidity wrote:I'm living proof.

Softs don't matter at all ever. Not even kidding. Any lack of softs can easily be compensated for by an interesting PS.
what were you're softs? A few people I asked were really modest about there softs whereas it seemed to me they've done a lot.

Btw, it says "Good softs" on your profile.
I concur with Cupidity (gah, I don't concur with "cupidity"), basically.

Unless it's really really really great softs and you're applying to Yale or Stanford when you already have good numbers.

Re: Is there living proof that it is really a numbers game?!

Posted: Sun Mar 07, 2010 5:22 am
by calicocat
Gamecubesupreme wrote:Softs matter to law school the same way a girl's personality matters to guys. Which is to say not very much at all.
:lol:

.

Posted: Sun Mar 07, 2010 5:43 am
by roranoa
.

Re: Is there living proof that it is really a numbers game?!

Posted: Sun Mar 07, 2010 5:52 am
by Richie Tenenbaum
roranoa wrote:As I feel lack the of preparation for the June LSAT, I also feel how much decent EC stuff I lack

to write on my resume.

So I wonder now and then if I should start some new EC stuff to write on my resume
when I apply for law school this fall.

What do people here think? Is it really a numbers game? Should just focus on my LSAT
at this point?

I have 2 yrs of WE and some debating experience and zip.(And played the violin in the orchestra, but I'm sure that 's not relevant)

Is there anyone with near zero EC like my self and got into HLS or CLS?
http://www.lawschoolnumbers.com

/thread.

Re: Is there living proof that it is really a numbers game?!

Posted: Sun Mar 07, 2010 5:53 am
by calicocat
roranoa wrote:
I don't get this :|
Cause the OP question was so silly, must be a flame.

Re: Is there living proof that it is really a numbers game?!

Posted: Sun Mar 07, 2010 6:10 am
by PunjabiLower
Gamecubesupreme wrote:Softs matter to law school the same way a girl's personality matters to guys. Which is to say not very much at all.
bad analogy

.

Posted: Sun Mar 07, 2010 7:17 am
by roranoa
.