Page 1 of 1
Everyone's in at WUSTL?
Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2010 3:56 pm
by dudnaito
According to lawschoolnumbers.com
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/finigol/jd
wow... 167 seems to be the golden number. As long as you have a 167, it looks like you're in. I have a 167, and a 3.4, does that mean i'm in? Doesn't even seem like anybody's been out yet albeit in a relatively limited sample size.
BTW, what's the diff. between triangles and circles (in lawschoolnumbers)?
Re: Everyone's in at WUSTL?
Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2010 4:02 pm
by Thomas Jefferson
dudnaito wrote:. I have a 167, and a 3.4, does that mean i'm in?
Yes.
Re: Everyone's in at WUSTL?
Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 1:04 am
by finigol
dudnaito wrote:According to lawschoolnumbers.com
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/finigol/jd
wow... 167 seems to be the golden number. As long as you have a 167, it looks like you're in. I have a 167, and a 3.4, does that mean i'm in? Doesn't even seem like anybody's been out yet albeit in a relatively limited sample size.
BTW, what's the diff. between triangles and circles (in lawschoolnumbers)?
I Am Law School (And So Can You!)
Re: Everyone's in at WUSTL?
Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 1:09 am
by PoliticalJunkie
They don't reject people until later in the cycle - or at least that's what I'm told. Priority is with acceptances
Re: Everyone's in at WUSTL?
Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 10:40 am
by JCougar
God, I hope so.
Re: Everyone's in at WUSTL?
Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 3:14 pm
by dudnaito
PoliticalJunkie wrote:They don't reject people until later in the cycle - or at least that's what I'm told. Priority is with acceptances
still doesn't explain an all-green. I mean.. shouldn't there be yellows at least?
Re: Everyone's in at WUSTL?
Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 3:19 pm
by emciosn
dudnaito wrote:PoliticalJunkie wrote:They don't reject people until later in the cycle - or at least that's what I'm told. Priority is with acceptances
still doesn't explain an all-green. I mean.. shouldn't there be yellows at least?
I would say that this and the relatively small (self selected) sample size would explain an all green.
Re: Everyone's in at WUSTL?
Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 5:37 pm
by dudnaito
emciosn wrote:dudnaito wrote:PoliticalJunkie wrote:They don't reject people until later in the cycle - or at least that's what I'm told. Priority is with acceptances
still doesn't explain an all-green. I mean.. shouldn't there be yellows at least?
I would say that this and the relatively small (self selected) sample size would explain an all green.
i know, but damn.... not a single non-green to offend the eye.