Everyone's in at WUSTL? Forum

[dudnaito]

According to lawschoolnumbers.com

http://lawschoolnumbers.com/finigol/jd

wow... 167 seems to be the golden number. As long as you have a 167, it looks like you're in. I have a 167, and a 3.4, does that mean i'm in? Doesn't even seem like anybody's been out yet albeit in a relatively limited sample size.

BTW, what's the diff. between triangles and circles (in lawschoolnumbers)?

[Thomas Jefferson]

. I have a 167, and a 3.4, does that mean i'm in?

Yes.

[finigol]

According to lawschoolnumbers.com

http://lawschoolnumbers.com/finigol/jd

wow... 167 seems to be the golden number. As long as you have a 167, it looks like you're in. I have a 167, and a 3.4, does that mean i'm in? Doesn't even seem like anybody's been out yet albeit in a relatively limited sample size.

BTW, what's the diff. between triangles and circles (in lawschoolnumbers)?

I Am Law School (And So Can You!)

[PoliticalJunkie]

They don't reject people until later in the cycle - or at least that's what I'm told. Priority is with acceptances

[JCougar]

God, I hope so.

[dudnaito]

They don't reject people until later in the cycle - or at least that's what I'm told. Priority is with acceptances

still doesn't explain an all-green. I mean.. shouldn't there be yellows at least?

[emciosn]

They don't reject people until later in the cycle - or at least that's what I'm told. Priority is with acceptances

still doesn't explain an all-green. I mean.. shouldn't there be yellows at least?

I would say that this and the relatively small (self selected) sample size would explain an all green.

[dudnaito]

They don't reject people until later in the cycle - or at least that's what I'm told. Priority is with acceptances

still doesn't explain an all-green. I mean.. shouldn't there be yellows at least?

I would say that this and the relatively small (self selected) sample size would explain an all green.

i know, but damn.... not a single non-green to offend the eye.