Page 1 of 1
E.D. shenanigans backfire!
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 10:27 pm
by Tangerine Gleam
I apologize if this has been posted already (in which case I'll delete the thread), but I was cruising LSN and wondered why someone with a 3.74/175 had been rejected from UCLA:
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/daninreallife/jd
After acceptance at Columbia via E.D., the applicant failed to withdraw from other schools (including an acceptance at Harvard). Word somehow spread and a deluge of dings were filed.
Just goes to show that Early Decisions contracts are very serious and cannot be trifled with.
Edit: Flame? I'm so gullible.
Re: E.D. shenanigans backfire!
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 10:32 pm
by DoubleChecks
lollerpwnt
Re: E.D. shenanigans backfire!
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 10:33 pm
by OriginalPerson
Tangerine Gleam wrote:I apologize if this has been posted already (in which case I'll delete the thread), but I was cruising LSN and wondered why someone with a 3.74/175 had been rejected from UCLA:
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/daninreallife/jd
After acceptance at Columbia via E.D., the applicant failed to withdraw from other schools (including an acceptance at Harvard). Word somehow spread and a deluge of dings were filed.
Just goes to show that Early Decisions contracts are very serious and cannot be trifled with.
Rhymes with Blame.
Re: E.D. shenanigans backfire!
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 10:44 pm
by mizzoutigers88
It sucks but he deserves it. Don't fuck around with ED!. It's not good to break the first contract you make in the law setting.
Re: E.D. shenanigans backfire!
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 10:46 pm
by hans3n
mizzoutigers88 wrote:Don't fuck around with ED!.
haha
Re: E.D. shenanigans backfire!
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 10:46 pm
by pany1985
awesome
Re: E.D. shenanigans backfire!
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 10:48 pm
by Tangerine Gleam
mizzoutigers88 wrote:It's not good to break the first contract you make in the law setting.
So true. What in the Christ was this guy thinking?
Re: E.D. shenanigans backfire!
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 10:49 pm
by Helmholtz
OriginalPerson wrote:Tangerine Gleam wrote:I apologize if this has been posted already (in which case I'll delete the thread), but I was cruising LSN and wondered why someone with a 3.74/175 had been rejected from UCLA:
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/daninreallife/jd
After acceptance at Columbia via E.D., the applicant failed to withdraw from other schools (including an acceptance at Harvard). Word somehow spread and a deluge of dings were filed.
Just goes to show that Early Decisions contracts are very serious and cannot be trifled with.
Rhymes with Blame.
This is what I think.
Re: E.D. shenanigans backfire!
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 10:50 pm
by dk8
wait. so this guy got into columbia ED, the other schools rejected him when they heard, and now columbia rescinded his acceptance?
Re: E.D. shenanigans backfire!
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 11:11 pm
by Tangerine Gleam
Helmholtz wrote:OriginalPerson wrote:Tangerine Gleam wrote:I apologize if this has been posted already (in which case I'll delete the thread), but I was cruising LSN and wondered why someone with a 3.74/175 had been rejected from UCLA:
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/daninreallife/jd
After acceptance at Columbia via E.D., the applicant failed to withdraw from other schools (including an acceptance at Harvard). Word somehow spread and a deluge of dings were filed.
Just goes to show that Early Decisions contracts are very serious and cannot be trifled with.
Rhymes with Blame.
This is what I think.
I'm so dense that I first read this comment and thought, "Lame? Yeah, it is lame!"
Y'all are probably right about this.
Re: E.D. shenanigans backfire!
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 11:57 pm
by OriginalPerson
Tangerine Gleam wrote:Helmholtz wrote:OriginalPerson wrote:Tangerine Gleam wrote:I apologize if this has been posted already (in which case I'll delete the thread), but I was cruising LSN and wondered why someone with a 3.74/175 had been rejected from UCLA:
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/daninreallife/jd
After acceptance at Columbia via E.D., the applicant failed to withdraw from other schools (including an acceptance at Harvard). Word somehow spread and a deluge of dings were filed.
Just goes to show that Early Decisions contracts are very serious and cannot be trifled with.
Rhymes with Blame.
This is what I think.
I'm so dense that I first read this comment and thought, "Lame? Yeah, it is lame!"
Y'all are probably right about this.
I'm probably also right that the user rhyming with "ponzerelli" should be reinstated.
(hint: replace "p" with first letter of word that rhymes with blame)
Re: E.D. shenanigans backfire!
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 1:25 am
by BenJ
dk8 wrote:wait. so this guy got into columbia ED, the other schools rejected him when they heard, and now columbia rescinded his acceptance?
The story is that he applied to Columbia ED, and also to Harvard, Stanford and a number of other schools. He got into Harvard and Stanford, then got into Columbia ED, then refused to withdraw from Harvard and Stanford to fulfill his ED contract with Columbia. Then Columbia, Harvard and Stanford rescinded his acceptances, as did all the other decent schools to which he applied or which had already accepted him.
It's probably fake, though.
Re: E.D. shenanigans backfire!
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 1:33 am
by 09042014
Schools don't follow up to make sure you withdraw acceptances. They do however send out lists to peer schools that you were accepted. U of Chicago never I had been accepted to NU ED. Other schools had no idea and asked where I was going.
Re: E.D. shenanigans backfire!
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 1:41 am
by jrobby6
Couldn't he just apply to more schools? Better schools at that?
Re: E.D. shenanigans backfire!
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 2:02 am
by SamSeaborn2016
ED is some serious shit.
--ImageRemoved--