Chance
Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 11:54 pm
Answered
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=102366
im a firm believer that numbers speak for themselves, as evident in the incoming 1L class statics of all T-14s.kumba84 wrote:Not sure why you would do either of these things. You should just write a semi-interesting, non-plagiarized two page essay and not worry about it.
This makes no sense. Schools taking high-LSAT/GPA applicants ≠ Schools taking all available high-LSAT/GPA applicants. Schools end up rejecting folks who have the same numbers as the people they accept. There are enough people applying to top law schools that those schools can reject the occasional total fuckup without hurting themselves in any way.SandyC877 wrote:im a firm believer that numbers speak for themselves, as evident in the incoming 1L class statics of all T-14s.kumba84 wrote:Not sure why you would do either of these things. You should just write a semi-interesting, non-plagiarized two page essay and not worry about it.
DO IT. The worst that can happen is that you remove yourself from the competition.SandyC877 wrote:im a firm believer that numbers speak for themselves, as evident in the incoming 1L class statics of all T-14s.kumba84 wrote:Not sure why you would do either of these things. You should just write a semi-interesting, non-plagiarized two page essay and not worry about it.
Do it. You can report back on your findings to the rest of us. Be bold, be brave, be the test case!SandyC877 wrote:not that I would do it, it just seems possible.
You honestly don't think that at least a few top schools, even those just outside T-14, would take me?kazu wrote:I vote for you doing it and then letting us know how it goesIf it does work it'll be valuable knowledge for future applicants....
I didn't say that, I suppose there may be a few, it's just that nobody honestly knows which schools are the true numbers whores and which actually look at the applications "holistically". I guess I was being half-serious when saying that if you do decide to go ahead, the results will be valuable for the rest of us.SandyC877 wrote:You honestly don't think that at least a few top schools, even those just outside T-14, would take me?kazu wrote:I vote for you doing it and then letting us know how it goesIf it does work it'll be valuable knowledge for future applicants....
Exactly. They don't need one person all that bad.vanwinkle wrote:This makes no sense. Schools taking high-LSAT/GPA applicants ≠ Schools taking all available high-LSAT/GPA applicants. Schools end up rejecting folks who have the same numbers as the people they accept. There are enough people applying to top law schools that those schools can reject the occasional total fuckup without hurting themselves in any way.SandyC877 wrote:im a firm believer that numbers speak for themselves, as evident in the incoming 1L class statics of all T-14s.kumba84 wrote:Not sure why you would do either of these things. You should just write a semi-interesting, non-plagiarized two page essay and not worry about it.
If you're a firm believer that numbers speak for themselves why write a risky PS that could possibly get you dinged from the best schools? A 176 with a 3.9 is great, but not so good that it will ensure acceptance into some schools if your PS is a pile of shit; or, even if they are, why tempt fate? I agree with the quote above. It seems odd that someone would work so hard to secure a 3.9 and 176 LSAT score only to jeopardize their chances by producing a risky or gimmicky PS. Then again I haven't read your PS, and maybe it very good, you'll have to be the judge of that.SandyC877 wrote:im a firm believer that numbers speak for themselves, as evident in the incoming 1L class statics of all T-14s.kumba84 wrote:Not sure why you would do either of these things. You should just write a semi-interesting, non-plagiarized two page essay and not worry about it.
if you want to test out your hypothesis, try it for schools with large classes that aren't known for yield protecting like nyu and georgetown. They're probably the schools where it's easiest to predict admissions decisions. some small schools may try to tailor their class in particular fashion and other schools may yield protect, so for these it would be harder to tell whether a rejected/waitlisted decision was do to these factors or a provocative PS.SandyC877 wrote:If I have a 3.9/176 and wrote an auto-biographical style poem as a PS, would it hurt my chances? How about if I copy and paste an entry of Wikipedia. Would schools care?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dkF7Bj5cxJUjawsthegreat wrote:He should ED to UVA and just write watermelon 1000 times for his PS and see if he gets in.
i would say schools would totally care...at least a good number of schools in the T14SandyC877 wrote:im a firm believer that numbers speak for themselves, as evident in the incoming 1L class statics of all T-14s.kumba84 wrote:Not sure why you would do either of these things. You should just write a semi-interesting, non-plagiarized two page essay and not worry about it.
lol...this is pretty overt.jawsthegreat wrote:He should ED to UVA and just write watermelon 1000 times for his PS and see if he gets in.
I...what just happened?vanwinkle wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dkF7Bj5cxJUjawsthegreat wrote:He should ED to UVA and just write watermelon 1000 times for his PS and see if he gets in.
I would think that for schools like Stanford or Yale, that have smaller bodies and are probably more selective about the "type" of student they admit, a good PS would definitely help. Your original question, will a terrible PS hurt a 3.9 / 176 applicant, didn't really ask whether good PSs can help your application, only whether a bad one could hurt.SandyC877 wrote:From what I can gather, the majority opinion is that PS can hurt you, but it can't help you.