A single, across-the-board PS?
Posted: Wed Oct 09, 2019 11:17 am
It seems that most applicants craft a single PS to use at all schools. (With some tinkering, of course -- changing the Why X portion, if it's in there at all, and length parameters.) Is this the case? Because the prompts at the different T14 schools seem to vary a bit, in subtle ways -- in what they choose to emphasize in telling you, the writer-applicant, what to emphasize on or not.
It's silly (and very difficult), of course, to write five really different personal statements (though can write a hundred personal essays). But Chicago gives examples of what has worked -- and they are uniformly structured as stories; a personal obstacle/challenge overcome is the content (with rather generic/banal conclusions, IMHO!). It seems dubious to me whether this sort of thing would work everywhere...
Using an addendum as an extension of your PS: wrong (obviously?). But using an addendum (or optional essay) to write about an aspect of yourself that doesn't cohere with your PS (don't want the main statement to feel crammed) -- is that, so to speak, kosher?
It's silly (and very difficult), of course, to write five really different personal statements (though can write a hundred personal essays). But Chicago gives examples of what has worked -- and they are uniformly structured as stories; a personal obstacle/challenge overcome is the content (with rather generic/banal conclusions, IMHO!). It seems dubious to me whether this sort of thing would work everywhere...
Using an addendum as an extension of your PS: wrong (obviously?). But using an addendum (or optional essay) to write about an aspect of yourself that doesn't cohere with your PS (don't want the main statement to feel crammed) -- is that, so to speak, kosher?