Not your normal PS (draft 5 billion)
Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2010 9:57 pm
.
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=141818
You might want to rephrase what you were searching for. Maybe you were searching for freedom of opinion? Because while geometry is a good representation of consistency, I would argue that history and law are not. The great thing about the legal system is that it is constantly changing and adjusting.Frustrated, I satisfied my need for consistency with my studies
I think just one more is enough.more and more exorbitant
I don't understand this at all. Elaborate? Maybe make it more personal (write "my" instead of "her"). The impersonal phrasing kind of confused me. And what first principles?Enlightenment writings provided the building blocks for a new understanding of the individual and her relationship with authority. I progressed from accepting religious dogma as a justification for my parents’ actions to demanding a logical defense built on accepted first principles
You could probably take out the second comma. That's just my personal grammar preferences though, no need to change it.By junior year, my understanding had matured, and I was convinced
The "first principle" thing didn't strike me as strange at all, but I come from a philosophy background. "Rational grounding" might make for a less stilted way of conveying the same thing though. The commas in the last sentence are all correct. If you took out the second one then it would be an error as "and" is linking two independent clauses in this case.kitmitzi wrote:So I'm not that good at writing PS myself, so feel free to ignore my critique. I may be completely wrong.
You might want to rephrase what you were searching for. Maybe you were searching for freedom of opinion? Because while geometry is a good representation of consistency, I would argue that history and law are not. The great thing about the legal system is that it is constantly changing and adjusting.Frustrated, I satisfied my need for consistency with my studies
I think just one more is enough.more and more exorbitant
I don't understand this at all. Elaborate? Maybe make it more personal (write "my" instead of "her"). The impersonal phrasing kind of confused me. And what first principles?Enlightenment writings provided the building blocks for a new understanding of the individual and her relationship with authority. I progressed from accepting religious dogma as a justification for my parents’ actions to demanding a logical defense built on accepted first principles
The last picky thing was I think some of your commas are unnecessary.You could probably take out the second comma. That's just my personal grammar preferences though, no need to change it.By junior year, my understanding had matured, and I was convinced
Otherwise, I thought it was very good! Interesting topic and definitely relates to what makes you want to be a lawyer. Your link to why Georgetown was good too.
Thanks for critiquing my critique. As I said, I'm not an expert so I might be wrong. I don't have a background in philosophy which is why I was confused. Maybe you should critique the PS instead of me?The "first principle" thing didn't strike me as strange at all, but I come from a philosophy background. "Rational grounding" might make for a less stilted way of conveying the same thing though. The commas in the last sentence are all correct. If you took out the second one then it would be an error as "and" is linking two independent clauses in this case.