Black Canadian?
Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 4:39 pm
Would I be considered a URM?
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=209634
Yeah I am talking about American schools. So they would just treat me like any other applicant eh?bosmer88 wrote:OP, assuming you are talking about American law schools, I think you would be considered international, thus you wouldn't get as big of a bump, if any at all.
I can't say for sure you wouldn't get any boost. I do believe though that if you got any type of boost, it wouldn't be as substantial if you were a us citizen/resident/etc.Xixak wrote:Yeah I am talking about American schools. So they would just treat me like any other applicant eh?bosmer88 wrote:OP, assuming you are talking about American law schools, I think you would be considered international, thus you wouldn't get as big of a bump, if any at all.
Btw to the first poster... I'm not flaming just asking an honest question.
No we've been here for quite some time. I guess they don't care that I'm black if I'm from another country eh?bosmer88 wrote:I can't say for sure you wouldn't get any boost. I do believe though that if you got any type of boost, it wouldn't be as substantial if you were a us citizen/resident/etc.Xixak wrote:Yeah I am talking about American schools. So they would just treat me like any other applicant eh?bosmer88 wrote:OP, assuming you are talking about American law schools, I think you would be considered international, thus you wouldn't get as big of a bump, if any at all.
Btw to the first poster... I'm not flaming just asking an honest question.
Are you or your parents recent immigrants? If so, you could use the background/experiences in a DS.
The URM bump as used by US law schools is supposed to benefit US citizens and residents. I'd get that if you came to the US, you'd likely be indiscernible from any other black person living in the US, but that is the way it works.Xixak wrote:No we've been here for quite some time. I guess they don't care that I'm black if I'm from another country eh?bosmer88 wrote:I can't say for sure you wouldn't get any boost. I do believe though that if you got any type of boost, it wouldn't be as substantial if you were a us citizen/resident/etc.Xixak wrote:Yeah I am talking about American schools. So they would just treat me like any other applicant eh?bosmer88 wrote:OP, assuming you are talking about American law schools, I think you would be considered international, thus you wouldn't get as big of a bump, if any at all.
Btw to the first poster... I'm not flaming just asking an honest question.
Are you or your parents recent immigrants? If so, you could use the background/experiences in a DS.
172-3Xixak wrote:Guess no URM boost. So with my projected 3.65 GPA im screwed out of the T-6 unless i get a 180 LSAT.
But affirmative action was created to right the wrongs of the past to create a more even playing field for those who were wronged in this country. That is why African/Native AMERICANS get the boost and international students don't.jas1503 wrote:Ignore some of these comments.
Truthfully, you don't even have to be black to claim black-URM status.
Being from Canada doesn't make any difference at all.
I'm assuming that "being wronged" in this country means that you're talking about slavery and segregation for African Americans; and for the very, very few Native Americans left, the wrong you're talking about has to do with the wars lost that resulted in much of their land being taken.ManoftheHour wrote:But affirmative action was created to right the wrongs of the past to create a more even playing field for those who were wronged in this country. That is why African/Native AMERICANS get the boost and international students don't.jas1503 wrote:Ignore some of these comments.
Truthfully, you don't even have to be black to claim black-URM status.
Being from Canada doesn't make any difference at all.
Many minorities start off at a disadvantage because the state of their ancestors was not ideal.
This does not apply to international students.
I'm not saying that's my logic. I'm not even saying I believe in or don't believe in AA. This is all irrelevant to OP. Not trying to incite any AA debates around here. I'm saying that that is probably THE logic that the schools are going by. I don't know if Spain is giving this boost instead. They might, they might not. But we're not talking about Spanish schools so I'm not sure what you're trying to get out of that question.jas1503 wrote:I'm assuming that "being wronged" in this country means that you're talking about slavery and segregation for African Americans; and for the very, very few Native Americans left, the wrong you're talking about has to do with the wars lost that resulted in much of their land being taken.ManoftheHour wrote:But affirmative action was created to right the wrongs of the past to create a more even playing field for those who were wronged in this country. That is why African/Native AMERICANS get the boost and international students don't.jas1503 wrote:Ignore some of these comments.
Truthfully, you don't even have to be black to claim black-URM status.
Being from Canada doesn't make any difference at all.
Many minorities start off at a disadvantage because the state of their ancestors was not ideal.
This does not apply to international students.
Can you explain to me what the Mexican, Cuban, PR boost is for? Is it the Encomienda? By your logic, why isn't Spain giving out this boost instead?
Xixak wrote:Really wish I got this boost.
Xixak wrote:Guess no URM boost.
maybe if you wish really hard!Xixak wrote:Really sucks to not get the URM boost.
This thread is what's wrong with the on-topics lately. Everyone thinks they're a hilarious troll and it impedes on giving decent advice to people legitimately asking for it.soj wrote:What's everyone talking about? Black international students do get the AA bump.
bosmer88 wrote:The URM bump as used by US law schools is supposed to benefit US citizens and residents. I'd get that if you came to the US, you'd likely be indiscernible from any other black person living in the US, but that is the way it works.
Call me cynical, but there's nothing law schools care less about than redressing past racial wrongs. They care about statistical or visible diversity. Black Canadians do get the URM bump. I don't know about Canadian First Nations because they so rarely apply to US law schools, but I would guess they get the bump, too.ManoftheHour wrote:But affirmative action was created to right the wrongs of the past to create a more even playing field for those who were wronged in this country. That is why African/Native AMERICANS get the boost and international students don't.
Many minorities start off at a disadvantage because the state of their ancestors was not ideal.
This does not apply to international students.
So how long this and future generation has to pay for the sins of their forefather ?ManoftheHour wrote:But affirmative action was created to right the wrongs of the past to create a more even playing field for those who were wronged in this country. That is why African/Native AMERICANS get the boost and international students don't.jas1503 wrote:Ignore some of these comments.
Truthfully, you don't even have to be black to claim black-URM status.
Being from Canada doesn't make any difference at all.
Many minorities start off at a disadvantage because the state of their ancestors was not ideal.
This does not apply to international students.