It's a crappy school.
Schools like it attract four types of students:
1. Minorities with decent scores that didn't know any better.
2. Minorities with poor scores.
3. "Majorities" with poor scores.
4. "Majorities" with legacies (parents went there, started a firm, and the student wants to join the firm)
Minorities are generally not in the top 15% of a law school class. Sh*t happens. This is important because all HBCUs except for Howard are at least 30% non-minority. When you add the two factors together you see that "majorities" generally make up the top 15% of the other HBCUs. Employers know this and these top placing "majorities" are not treated any differently than had they attended any other T3/T4 school.
Howard is around 90% minority, and thus a large portion of the top 15% of the class is composed of minority students. Employers know this and are attracted to it because they can hire minority law students that graduated Summa Cum Laude from law school (and other latin honors). Therefore,
Howard Law school appears to have far better job prospects than it actually does. If NCCU, FAMU, or Texas Southern were 90% minority, their employment outcomes would be on par with Howard (except for FAMU, for other reasons).
Please don't think employers will not go deeper into the class for minority students from well regarded schools. In fact, in both my personal experience and from what I have heard, employers love minority students that go to high profile schools. Of course this is true for firms, but this is true for government and other sectors as well.
It's mighty morphing examples time:
1. I work in city government. Over the summer, the office will have 3 Tulane interns and 3 Loyola interns. No LSU or Southern.
2. Over the summer, the Orleans Public Defenders will have 1 Southern U intern out of 46 interns.
PM me if you have any questions that you don't want to put up in this thread.