Brooklyn Law vs. Emory vs. Fordham vs. GWU vs. WUSTL
Posted: Mon Mar 29, 2010 1:33 am
Yes. I know. There are tons of these on this site but now I understand why so many people have done it. I thought making this decision would have been way easier.
I have posted this elsewhere on the site but I post it here with the hope getting perspectives that I expect will have a unique twist having been "colored" by life and experiences. . . that probably wasn't funny but i'm being serious. Is there anything I should be considering as someone who can check pretty much every single "diversity box"?
I am petrified by the thought of not living in or near a major city for law school. Is this unreasonable? I've never been to St. Louis so I am definitely just going off what are probably very incorrect perceptions and assumptions.
Brooklyn Law
129,000 over 3 years (class rank stipulation, top 40% to get scholarship renewed 100 percent and top 60% to get scholarship renewed by 85%)
Emory
60,000 over 3 years (no stipulations except stay in school)
Fordham
no $$. sticker.
GWU
105,000 over 3 years (30,000 per year and 16,500 for free first year housing in school-owned building; 3.0 gpa stipulation to get scholarship renewed)
WUSTL
149,000 over 3 years (no stipualtions except to "mantain residency at the law school"? idk what that means if anything. basically sounds like, stay in school)
A few points to note:
1) Ultimately I want to live and work in New York (along w/ most people). I do not necessarily want "biglaw", in fact, not really, but if I incurred the debt I would be willing to do so.
2) I am.. for lack of a better phrase, "super liberal" in most, if not all areas of my life.
3) I'm international and black for those interested
Ultimately, I am torn between extreme debt aversion and location (both for the duration of my time in law school and after).
Any thoughts?
(oh, and I suppose people will want to know my "stats". 3.2 (t12 liberal arts college) and 169 lsat. applied in mid to late January to all schools)
I have posted this elsewhere on the site but I post it here with the hope getting perspectives that I expect will have a unique twist having been "colored" by life and experiences. . . that probably wasn't funny but i'm being serious. Is there anything I should be considering as someone who can check pretty much every single "diversity box"?
I am petrified by the thought of not living in or near a major city for law school. Is this unreasonable? I've never been to St. Louis so I am definitely just going off what are probably very incorrect perceptions and assumptions.
Brooklyn Law
129,000 over 3 years (class rank stipulation, top 40% to get scholarship renewed 100 percent and top 60% to get scholarship renewed by 85%)
Emory
60,000 over 3 years (no stipulations except stay in school)
Fordham
no $$. sticker.
GWU
105,000 over 3 years (30,000 per year and 16,500 for free first year housing in school-owned building; 3.0 gpa stipulation to get scholarship renewed)
WUSTL
149,000 over 3 years (no stipualtions except to "mantain residency at the law school"? idk what that means if anything. basically sounds like, stay in school)
A few points to note:
1) Ultimately I want to live and work in New York (along w/ most people). I do not necessarily want "biglaw", in fact, not really, but if I incurred the debt I would be willing to do so.
2) I am.. for lack of a better phrase, "super liberal" in most, if not all areas of my life.
3) I'm international and black for those interested
Ultimately, I am torn between extreme debt aversion and location (both for the duration of my time in law school and after).
Any thoughts?
(oh, and I suppose people will want to know my "stats". 3.2 (t12 liberal arts college) and 169 lsat. applied in mid to late January to all schools)