Page 1 of 2
Is is true??
Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 7:15 pm
by raperez129
I've read that research shows that URMs typically score 10 points below their non URM counter-parts on the LSAT, even when compared with similar GPAs. I am sure there isn't a written rule anywhere on this, but is is true that adcoms will "compensate" by bumping the LSAT when considering?
Just wondering because I am *almost* at the 25th percentile for a couple of schools, but with a "bump" I would be well above range..
Re: Is is true??
Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 10:24 pm
by YCrevolution
..
Re: Is is true??
Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 10:29 pm
by merichard87
From what I have seen on LSN and here Law School Predictor is trash when it comes to URM's because of the unpredictable nature of our apps but I think the general assumption is that URM's get up to a 10 pt boost on the LSAT.
Re: Is is true??
Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 10:34 pm
by rundoxierun
Lol... where did this theory of the 10 point boost come from?? Like did someone just randomly say 10 points for being URM and everyone accepted it?? lol, is this was the truth then i would have a 187 and a 174.. with a 181 average lol.
Re: Is is true??
Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 10:36 pm
by Ragged
raperez129 wrote:I've read that research shows that URMs typically score 10 points below their non URM counter-parts on the LSAT, even when compared with similar GPAs. I am sure there isn't a written rule anywhere on this, but is is true that adcoms will "compensate" by bumping the LSAT when considering?
Just wondering because I am *almost* at the 25th percentile for a couple of schools, but with a "bump" I would be well above range..
From what I heard about it, URMs are being considered against other URMs. They don't compete with non-URMs. So yea, effectively they get a ~10 point boost.
Re: Is is true??
Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 10:37 pm
by YCrevolution
..
Re: Is is true??
Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 10:39 pm
by Philo38
So you are saying you are a URM? Man . . . It must be a VERY good moment when you realize the boost you just got in your cycle. I mean, if you didn't realize it before, this is like the LSAC calling you: "um yeah, we messed up the scoring on your test, turns out that 171 we gave you is actually a 177. Have a nice day."
Re: Is is true??
Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 10:41 pm
by Ragged
YCrevolution wrote:merichard87 wrote:From what I have seen on LSN and here Law School Predictor is trash when it comes to URM's because of the unpredictable nature of our apps but I think the general assumption is that URM's get up to a 10 pt boost on the LSAT.
The 10-point boost thing is largely a figment of some over-zealous imaginations.
http://www.lawschoolpredictor.com/?page_id=173
Law School Predictor wrote:Underrepresented Minorities (URMs)
Target admit rates for URMs, based on how LSP renders predictions: (same method as non-URM applicants after URM boost is applied)
When LSP said Admit: >= 87%
When LSP said Strong Consider: ~ 69%
When LSP said Consider: ~ 50%
When LSP said Weak Consider: ~ 31%
When LSP said Deny: <= 13%
Based on the 4,300+ LSN 2008-09 decisions for self-identified URMs and with LSP URM feature enabled:
When LSP said Admit, 963 instances: 87.1%, +0.1%
When LSP said Strong Consider, 418 instances: 70.8%, +1.8%
When LSP said Consider, 1034 instances: 55.3%, +5.3%
When LSP said Weak Consider, 436 instances: 33.2%, +2.3%
When LSP said Deny, 1468 instances: 14.9%, +1.9%
Difference between actual URM admit rate and predicted URM admit rate: (prediction categories weighted evenly)
Average rate: +2.3%
Median rate: +1.9%
Uhh... ok? Is that supposed to refute the 10 point boost thing?
Re: Is is true??
Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 10:42 pm
by Ragged
Philo38 wrote:So you are saying you are a URM? Man . . . It must be a VERY good moment when you realize the boost you just got in your cycle. I mean, if you didn't realize it before, this is like the LSAC calling you: "um yeah, we messed up the scoring on your test, turns out that 171 we gave you is actually a 177. Have a nice day."
Or in her case 155 to a 161.
Re: Is is true??
Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 10:44 pm
by YCrevolution
..
Re: Is is true??
Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 10:45 pm
by Philo38
YCrevolution wrote:merichard87 wrote:From what I have seen on LSN and here Law School Predictor is trash when it comes to URM's because of the unpredictable nature of our apps but I think the general assumption is that URM's get up to a 10 pt boost on the LSAT.
The 10-point boost thing is largely a figment of some over-zealous imaginations.
http://www.lawschoolpredictor.com/?page_id=173
Law School Predictor wrote:Underrepresented Minorities (URMs)
Target admit rates for URMs, based on how LSP renders predictions: (same method as non-URM applicants after URM boost is applied)
When LSP said Admit: >= 87%
When LSP said Strong Consider: ~ 69%
When LSP said Consider: ~ 50%
When LSP said Weak Consider: ~ 31%
When LSP said Deny: <= 13%
Based on the 4,300+ LSN 2008-09 decisions for self-identified URMs and with LSP URM feature enabled:
When LSP said Admit, 963 instances: 87.1%, +0.1%
When LSP said Strong Consider, 418 instances: 70.8%, +1.8%
When LSP said Consider, 1034 instances: 55.3%, +5.3%
When LSP said Weak Consider, 436 instances: 33.2%, +2.3%
When LSP said Deny, 1468 instances: 14.9%, +1.9%
Difference between actual URM admit rate and predicted URM admit rate: (prediction categories weighted evenly)
Average rate: +2.3%
Median rate: +1.9%
Obviously it isn't fair to say add 10 points to your score. It is a far more complex process than that, and these numbers reflect that. It certainly depends on a URM's background, where on the range thier score is, the needs of the school, etc. I think it is fair to say a URM
could get a 10 point boost at a particular institution, in a particular case. But I don't think you can just take an extra 10 points to the bank as a URM.
Re: Is is true??
Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 10:50 pm
by merichard87
As I said it is UP TO a 10 pt boost which is what I consider a good estimate when I see URMs with LSATs UP TO 10pts under the medians gaining admission to law school. Of course you still have to be a viable candidate. So to summarize: Don't apply to Harvard with a 158 but if you have a 165 and are a URM, give it the 'ol college try.
Re: Is is true??
Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 10:57 pm
by Philo38
Ragged wrote:Philo38 wrote:So you are saying you are a URM? Man . . . It must be a VERY good moment when you realize the boost you just got in your cycle. I mean, if you didn't realize it before, this is like the LSAC calling you: "um yeah, we messed up the scoring on your test, turns out that 171 we gave you is actually a 177. Have a nice day."
Or in her case 155 to a 161.
Yeah . . . I'll admit I stopped that post midway through and just started day-dreaming about being a URM.
Re: Is is true??
Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 11:05 pm
by PDaddy
The predictor is somewhat inaccurate. There have been too many URM's with scores just below or just above 160 who have gotten into the bottom half of T14 and even the top half with really strong GPA's and softs.
Re: Is is true??
Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 11:07 pm
by rundoxierun
Am I the only laughing at the thought of a dean instructing the committee to adjust lsat by race?? like +12 for native american, +10 for black or puerto rican, +8 for mexican and -2 for asian.
Re: Is is true??
Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 11:07 pm
by PDaddy
merichard87 wrote:As I said it is UP TO a 10 pt boost which is what I consider a good estimate when I see URMs with LSATs UP TO 10pts under the medians gaining admission to law school. Of course you still have to be a viable candidate. So to summarize: Don't apply to Harvard with a 158 but if you have a 165 and are a URM, give it the 'ol college try.
That depends. A URM with 158 can get into Harvard with a strong GPA and great softs.
tkgrrett wrote:Am I the only laughing at the thought of a dean instructing the committee to adjust lsat by race?? like +12 for native american, +10 for black or puerto rican, +8 for mexican and -2 for asian.
It happens, but it's more "intuitive" than that. Adcoms are looking at the courses taken and the grade trend, LOR's, etc. Based on all of the other factors, including whether there was financial hardship, they are trying to gage where the person might be if given the advantages of a white similarly graded white student. Not all AA's, HA's or NA's are going to get the same boosts, and not all will get boosts. But some will, and, based on the admissions trends, it looks like there's no real formula.
Re: Is is true??
Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 11:08 pm
by Herb Watchfell
I would advice you to avoid that predictor website. I speak from experience when I tell you that it's absolutely atrocious, at least when it comes to predicting URM cycles.
Re: Is is true??
Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 11:22 pm
by YCrevolution
..
Re: Is is true??
Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 11:44 pm
by merichard87
YCrevolution wrote:Herb Watchfell wrote:
I would advice you to avoid that predictor website. I speak from experience when I tell you that it's absolutely atrocious, at least when it comes to predicting URM cycles.
http://www.lawschoolpredictor.com/?page_id=173
Law School Predictor wrote:Underrepresented Minorities (URMs)
Target admit rates for URMs, based on how LSP renders predictions: (same method as non-URM applicants after URM boost is applied)
When LSP said Admit: >= 87%
When LSP said Strong Consider: ~ 69%
When LSP said Consider: ~ 50%
When LSP said Weak Consider: ~ 31%
When LSP said Deny: <= 13%
Based on the 4,300+ LSN 2008-09 decisions for self-identified URMs and with LSP URM feature enabled:
When LSP said Admit, 963 instances: 87.1%, +0.1%
When LSP said Strong Consider, 418 instances: 70.8%, +1.8%
When LSP said Consider, 1034 instances: 55.3%, +5.3%
When LSP said Weak Consider, 436 instances: 33.2%, +2.3%
When LSP said Deny, 1468 instances: 14.9%, +1.9%
Difference between actual URM admit rate and predicted URM admit rate: (prediction categories weighted evenly)
Average rate: +2.3%
Median rate: +1.9%
You posting it over and over will not make it true. Let it go.
Re: Is is true??
Posted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 12:01 am
by Ragged
tkgrrett wrote:Am I the only laughing at the thought of a dean instructing the committee to adjust lsat by race?? like +12 for native american, +10 for black or puerto rican, +8 for mexican and -2 for asian.
Like I said, its not how it works. URMs are competing amongst themselves for the spots allocated to URMs. Because URMs score around 1 (or something like that) standard deviation below non-URMs, such segragation translates into a significant boost to URMs when it comes to the LSAT. If all URMs started to score better, than boost would be decreased by about the same amount.
So yes you, with your 177, is an equivalent of 184. Because amongst URM scoring a 177 is even more rare than 180 amongst non-URMs. Congratulations.
Re: Is is true??
Posted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 5:08 am
by PDaddy
Ragged wrote:tkgrrett wrote:Am I the only laughing at the thought of a dean instructing the committee to adjust lsat by race?? like +12 for native american, +10 for black or puerto rican, +8 for mexican and -2 for asian.
Like I said, its not how it works. URMs are competing amongst themselves for the spots allocated to URMs. Because URMs score around 1 (or something like that) standard deviation below non-URMs, such segragation translates into a significant boost to URMs when it comes to the LSAT. If all URMs started to score better, than boost would be decreased by about the same amount.
So yes you, with your 177, is an equivalent of 184.
Because amongst URM scoring a 177 is even more rare than 180 amongst non-URMs. Congratulations.
Rare doesn't even begin to describe it. At 175+, how many are there, 5 African Americans per year? Maybe fewer.
Re: Is is true??
Posted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 10:16 am
by YCrevolution
..
Re: Is is true??
Posted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 11:23 am
by raperez129
Whoa.....
In OP, I didn't mean to imply they have a hard core 10 point boost. I was trying to point out that RESEARCH INDICATES that URMS score typically 10 points lower than non URMs, even among students with the same GPA. This to me is suggesting a bias. I am not saying it is in the test itself. It could be preparation availabiltiy, social support, anything. I was just wondering how much adcoms accounted for such a discrepency.
And I agree, the predictors aren't that acurate for URMs, purely based on not enough available data to sample.
Re: Is is true??
Posted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 11:26 am
by YCrevolution
..
Re: Is is true??
Posted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 11:31 am
by LegalGENius
It's a tough call. For example, at a school like Miami, the definition of URM changes significantly because the area is so saturated with Hispanics (myself included). I'm sure there are other schools like that, though none come to mind at the moment.
Btw, I once found a website that detailed the minority percentages for each law school and showed what the quotas were that they were trying to reach. If possible, I will try to find again and post a link here. . . brb