Top Law Schools

Very important consideration. Can one generalize on this matter? Are any top 20 schools outliers in this regard? Do you think there is a negative correlation between ranking and attractiveness of the female population? Thanks.

One of the hottest girls I've ever seen went to BU/BC/GW/ND...even at her undergrad (which was a highly-regarded, yet good-looking class), she was looked upon as extremely attractive. Other than that, I'd say UVA.

junelsat wrote:Very important consideration. Can one generalize on this matter? Are any top 20 schools outliers in this regard? Do you think there is a negative correlation between ranking and attractiveness of the female population? Thanks.

There are precisely as many very good looking girls as the rank of the school. for instance, at berkeley there are 6 very attractive girls and I'm dating one, leaving very slim pickings. I'd advise sticking to the bottom of the T1 schools if you want better luck.

GW

thuggishruggishbone wrote:GW

GW girls are fat and don't understand that fat girls shouldn't wear leggings everyday of the year.

Drake014 wrote:

junelsat wrote:Very important consideration. Can one generalize on this matter? Are any top 20 schools outliers in this regard? Do you think there is a negative correlation between ranking and attractiveness of the female population? Thanks.

There are precisely as many very good looking girls as the rank of the school. for instance, at berkeley there are 6 very attractive girls and I'm dating one, leaving very slim pickings. I'd advise sticking to the bottom of the T1 schools if you want better luck.

LOL. Wow. I would've figured there would be some hot girls at Berkeley being that it is California after all. There's a lot of smoking hot girls out at my school (surprisingly). I kinda feel like a kid in a candy store everyday. It's awesome.

jayzon wrote:My friend went to Stetson -- she was a knockout at my school, and she might have been the least attractive among her friends from the law school. Not a huge sample, but I saw more beautiful women in my one-day visit than I saw the entire week I spent in Boston. (And I'm not knocking Boston.)

Northeastern girls are meh. Especially Boston.

As for hotties, UVA (and it's undergrad population) is TCR.

Ah, interesting topic. This is one factor I have not considered yet. I am going to be at a bottom of the bucket school probably so the hot girl correlation theory may work out for me....I sure hope so. Because I'll need to be at the top of the class for this to even come close to paying off, and if I'm also attempting to impress a hot girl, it may motivate me even more haha

rayiner wrote:
Northeastern girls are meh. Especially Boston.

As for hotties, UVA (and it's undergrad population) is TCR.

I agree with the Boston part, but come on. NYC is pretty high atop the list as far as gorgeous women go.

odonnpj wrote:Ah, interesting topic. This is one factor I have not considered yet. I am going to be at a bottom of the bucket school probably so the hot girl correlation theory may work out for me....I sure hope so. Because I'll need to be at the top of the class for this to even come close to paying off, and if I'm also attempting to impress a hot girl, it may motivate me even more haha

FAIL on so many levels.

In the T14, UVA and Duke, I would think. In general, the further South, the more likely you are to find success. SEC=win.

Go for the South and NYC.

coolkatz321 wrote:

rayiner wrote:
Northeastern girls are meh. Especially Boston.

As for hotties, UVA (and it's undergrad population) is TCR.

I agree with the Boston part, but come on. NYC is pretty high atop the list as far as gorgeous women go.

NYC is an exception, largely due to the very high population of foreigners and other "ethnic" people.

NYU is ok... if I had to guess, I'd say UVA.

Also, Stanford might be up there too (on their promotional materials they say they emphasize physical activity, which means they probably attract fit individuals)

rayiner wrote:

coolkatz321 wrote:

rayiner wrote:
Northeastern girls are meh. Especially Boston.

As for hotties, UVA (and it's undergrad population) is TCR.

I agree with the Boston part, but come on. NYC is pretty high atop the list as far as gorgeous women go.

NYC is an exception, largely due to the very high population of foreigners and other "ethnic" people.

Yeah, I don't think so. NYC is just good-looking in general, regardless of the foreigners and ethnic people.

coolkatz321 wrote:

rayiner wrote:

coolkatz321 wrote:

rayiner wrote:
Northeastern girls are meh. Especially Boston.

As for hotties, UVA (and it's undergrad population) is TCR.

I agree with the Boston part, but come on. NYC is pretty high atop the list as far as gorgeous women go.

NYC is an exception, largely due to the very high population of foreigners and other "ethnic" people.

Yeah, I don't think so. NYC is just good-looking in general, regardless of the foreigners and ethnic people.

NYC draws a huge number of people from all over. So yeah, there are a lot of good looking people among them. However, if you leave aside the people who have only been there for a couple of years, and the various ethnic demographics (jews, italians, etc), what are you left with? Of course it's a picky distinction to make, but I just generally leave NYC and DC out of these discussions because the underlying nature of the populations makes it a somewhat "unfair" comparison.

rayiner wrote: NYC draws a huge number of people from all over. So yeah, there are a lot of good looking people among them. However, if you leave aside the people who have only been there for a couple of years, and the various ethnic demographics (jews, italians, etc), what are you left with? Of course it's a picky distinction to make, but I just generally leave NYC and DC out of these discussions because the underlying nature of the populations makes it a somewhat "unfair" comparison.

Oh, now I've got you. I didn't realize you were counting Jews and Italians (and others) as "ethnic." They make up a pretty significant chunk of the population. Regardless, we can leave NYC out of the conversation.

rayiner wrote:

odonnpj wrote:Ah, interesting topic. This is one factor I have not considered yet. I am going to be at a bottom of the bucket school probably so the hot girl correlation theory may work out for me....I sure hope so. Because I'll need to be at the top of the class for this to even come close to paying off, and if I'm also attempting to impress a hot girl, it may motivate me even more haha

FAIL on so many levels.

JOKE on so many levels.

In the top 20 I would say: Texas, UCLA, UVA...maybe Vandy

There are plenty of polls out there ranking colleges on the number of hot girls who attend, and since the road to profit for law students entails preying upon undergrads, I think that would be the best way to look at this.

coolkatz321 wrote:

rayiner wrote: NYC draws a huge number of people from all over. So yeah, there are a lot of good looking people among them. However, if you leave aside the people who have only been there for a couple of years, and the various ethnic demographics (jews, italians, etc), what are you left with? Of course it's a picky distinction to make, but I just generally leave NYC and DC out of these discussions because the underlying nature of the populations makes it a somewhat "unfair" comparison.

Oh, now I've got you. I didn't realize you were counting Jews and Italians (and others) as "ethnic." They make up a pretty significant chunk of the population. Regardless, we can leave NYC out of the conversation.

No slight on Jews and Italians, obviously. They're good looking people! I was just talking about the Northeast in very general terms, and honestly, there is a reason why NYC looks so much better than, well, say the rest of the state of NY.

this thread fails to deliver without pictures

rayiner wrote:

coolkatz321 wrote:

rayiner wrote: NYC draws a huge number of people from all over. So yeah, there are a lot of good looking people among them. However, if you leave aside the people who have only been there for a couple of years, and the various ethnic demographics (jews, italians, etc), what are you left with? Of course it's a picky distinction to make, but I just generally leave NYC and DC out of these discussions because the underlying nature of the populations makes it a somewhat "unfair" comparison.

Oh, now I've got you. I didn't realize you were counting Jews and Italians (and others) as "ethnic." They make up a pretty significant chunk of the population. Regardless, we can leave NYC out of the conversation.

No slight on Jews and Italians, obviously. They're good looking people! I was just talking about the Northeast in very general terms, and honestly, there is a reason why NYC looks so much better than, well, say the rest of the state of NY.

Let me guess, they are green and have faces of rich, old, dead white guys on 'em?

...

wisconsin's not too bad, i here that bc is where it's at though