Sanity Check - Is law school a good idea for me?
Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2018 10:46 pm
I’ve been a landman for the past five years. I spend much of my time reading conveyances, operating agreements, probate/district court proceedings, etc. and preparing ownership reports. Over my short career I’ve managed to impress the right people, resulting in quick pay raises and a good deal of autonomy. I’m currently managing projects at a small land brokerage, and pulling in $425/day, which is above average pay for a 5 year field landman IMO. I also collect a head-rate for every subordinate landman on my projects. Annual gross 1099 comes out around 110-120k typically.
The most a field landman could expect to make is likely around $500-$550/day. With my network I could probably secure an in-house position with an operator at some point making similar take-home, although salary seems to vary quite a bit between companies. Also, earning potential tends to taper off around $180k for senior in-house landmen. An executive role could outstrip that, with added equity sharing in some cases.
All of that to say: is it foolish of me to consider leaving this job to pursue a JD? And further, is it foolish of me to think that my background and network would help me land a good job as an oil and gas attorney?
My thinking is:
Worst Case: Can’t land a good job after law school, go back to the field landman gig. Make around $100k with limited room for advancement.
Best Case: land a job with a reputable firm doing oil and gas work, gain some interesting experience outside of title examination. Make similar money at the outset, but with much greater potential for advancement and high earning.
I suppose I’m kind of viewing the JD as a next step in this career as opposed to an outright career change. Does this seem accurate? Is it conceivable for my earning potential as a practicing attorney to outpace the career path I’m currently on?
I feel like my career experience has given me the start of a decent toolkit for a career as an attorney. It’s also given me some perspective on the day-to-day drudgery that many lawyers warn about: long days spent toiling over boring documents, billing hours to demanding and unappreciative clients, etc. I’ve dealt with similar conditions in my career so far, and have not only tolerated it but really enjoyed it. I don’t know if I’m overstating the relationship between my line of work and the actual practice of law, but it doesn’t feel like too much of a stretch based on my limited experience.
At this point I have my sights set on UH, SMU, and Baylor. With a reach to UT and some T50s that place well in Texas.
Also giving consideration to lower tier Texas schools depending on $$$. Many of the Title Attorneys I work with who have JDs from TAMU, Tech, St. Mary’s appear to have done very well for themselves and all seem very satisfied with their work. Although my goal is to branch out from title and I get the sense that these schools may not provide that opportunity.
I’m 100% debt-free and not considering paying full sticker at any institution.
I’m wondering if my outlook is foolishly optimistic here, would a JD really be an upward career move at this point?
The most a field landman could expect to make is likely around $500-$550/day. With my network I could probably secure an in-house position with an operator at some point making similar take-home, although salary seems to vary quite a bit between companies. Also, earning potential tends to taper off around $180k for senior in-house landmen. An executive role could outstrip that, with added equity sharing in some cases.
All of that to say: is it foolish of me to consider leaving this job to pursue a JD? And further, is it foolish of me to think that my background and network would help me land a good job as an oil and gas attorney?
My thinking is:
Worst Case: Can’t land a good job after law school, go back to the field landman gig. Make around $100k with limited room for advancement.
Best Case: land a job with a reputable firm doing oil and gas work, gain some interesting experience outside of title examination. Make similar money at the outset, but with much greater potential for advancement and high earning.
I suppose I’m kind of viewing the JD as a next step in this career as opposed to an outright career change. Does this seem accurate? Is it conceivable for my earning potential as a practicing attorney to outpace the career path I’m currently on?
I feel like my career experience has given me the start of a decent toolkit for a career as an attorney. It’s also given me some perspective on the day-to-day drudgery that many lawyers warn about: long days spent toiling over boring documents, billing hours to demanding and unappreciative clients, etc. I’ve dealt with similar conditions in my career so far, and have not only tolerated it but really enjoyed it. I don’t know if I’m overstating the relationship between my line of work and the actual practice of law, but it doesn’t feel like too much of a stretch based on my limited experience.
At this point I have my sights set on UH, SMU, and Baylor. With a reach to UT and some T50s that place well in Texas.
Also giving consideration to lower tier Texas schools depending on $$$. Many of the Title Attorneys I work with who have JDs from TAMU, Tech, St. Mary’s appear to have done very well for themselves and all seem very satisfied with their work. Although my goal is to branch out from title and I get the sense that these schools may not provide that opportunity.
I’m 100% debt-free and not considering paying full sticker at any institution.
I’m wondering if my outlook is foolishly optimistic here, would a JD really be an upward career move at this point?